For those who would really like to know Hillary beyond the caricature

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:They don't want to get to know her, because that might challenge their deep misogyny.

Its just boggles my mind that many do not want to know Clinton, neither they want to truly understand Trump's despicable past, yet will claim Trump will save the world from the satanic Hillary.

I’ve been around long enough and paid attention closely enough to know that she is corrupt as hell, divisive as can be, and lacks the judgment to serve as president.

Well stated. +1

Different poster. But you haven't been long enough to understand that Trump has run a corrupt organization and is so incompetent that he has bankrupted so many of his businesses(Trump Uni, Trump realty, Trump airline, Trump casino etc). Trump has such a great judgement that he tweets like a 17 year old rotten teen. And he SELF FUNDS his campaign from money given by his conned supporters who find it their duty to give their lil money to their billionaire master.

It is very difficult for a party to win the third time and Hillary is not a good candidate. So it was the best time to bring on Kasich or Jeb or Rubio to win the election easily. But the party nominates Trump. Moderate Kasich voters like my extended family will not support a vulgarian like Trump.

np
I like Kasich. Would vote for him without one bit of extra consideration.

But I thought this thread was about Hillary. Why is it her supporters keep bringing Trump into a discussion about Hillary. Knowing her beyond her caricature. As if the opinions are only based on exaggerations.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:They don't want to get to know her, because that might challenge their deep misogyny.

Its just boggles my mind that many do not want to know Clinton, neither they want to truly understand Trump's despicable past, yet will claim Trump will save the world from the satanic Hillary.

I’ve been around long enough and paid attention closely enough to know that she is corrupt as hell, divisive as can be, and lacks the judgment to serve as president.

Well stated. +1

Different poster. But you haven't been long enough to understand that Trump has run a corrupt organization and is so incompetent that he has bankrupted so many of his businesses(Trump Uni, Trump realty, Trump airline, Trump casino etc). Trump has such a great judgement that he tweets like a 17 year old rotten teen. And he SELF FUNDS his campaign from money given by his conned supporters who find it their duty to give their lil money to their billionaire master.

It is very difficult for a party to win the third time and Hillary is not a good candidate. So it was the best time to bring on Kasich or Jeb or Rubio to win the election easily. But the party nominates Trump. Moderate Kasich voters like my extended family will not support a vulgarian like Trump.

Oh, it's the 'master' asshat poster again. Moving on...

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It is fun to watch these posters (likely from Correct the Record) work so hard to try to convince some of us not to “throw away” our vote.
You might want to seek a real job. Your position at CTR will disappear in a couple of months.

Some of you keep saying this. It's really offensive that you think that anyone who likes Hillary must necessarily be paid. It makes me believe that the PP who thinks you're a Trump voter masquerading as a Sanders supporter is correct.

And oh my god, go back in the archives. We have done the "why I am voting for Hillary and you should, too" to death.

And it's offensive to me for someone to assume that anyone who objects to Hillary, and/or criticizes her in any way, is automatically a Trump supporter.

Nobody says you can't criticize Clinton, but the false equivalence is riduculous. Trump lies about everything all the time, he changes his positions faster than the weather, but Clinton is "dishonest" because she changed her position from what she thought 20 years ago. Clinton gets criticized for supporting the war on Iraq, Trump also supported the war, but nobody calls him on that lie.

Your argument fails because you are introducing things that are not in this discourse and you are assuming a hell of a lot as if it applies.

And this false equivalence is a cheap, and usually used by partisan Democrats here, cliche. If you want to base your vote on my candidate isn't as bad as the other, then that's your right.

So, get to the podium and debate and stop this comparison and false equivalence shit. If you can't do that then sit down.

This post doesn't make any sense.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It is fun to watch these posters (likely from Correct the Record) work so hard to try to convince some of us not to “throw away” our vote.
You might want to seek a real job. Your position at CTR will disappear in a couple of months.

Some of you keep saying this. It's really offensive that you think that anyone who likes Hillary must necessarily be paid. It makes me believe that the PP who thinks you're a Trump voter masquerading as a Sanders supporter is correct.

And oh my god, go back in the archives. We have done the "why I am voting for Hillary and you should, too" to death.

And it's offensive to me for someone to assume that anyone who objects to Hillary, and/or criticizes her in any way, is automatically a Trump supporter.

Nobody says you can't criticize Clinton, but the false equivalence is riduculous. Trump lies about everything all the time, he changes his positions faster than the weather, but Clinton is "dishonest" because she changed her position from what she thought 20 years ago. Clinton gets criticized for supporting the war on Iraq, Trump also supported the war, but nobody calls him on that lie.

Your argument fails because you are introducing things that are not in this discourse and you are assuming a hell of a lot as if it applies.

And this false equivalence is a cheap, and usually used by partisan Democrats here, cliche. If you want to base your vote on my candidate isn't as bad as the other, then that's your right.

So, get to the podium and debate and stop this comparison and false equivalence shit. If you can't do that then sit down.

This post doesn't make any sense.

Then sit down.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It is fun to watch these posters (likely from Correct the Record) work so hard to try to convince some of us not to “throw away” our vote.
You might want to seek a real job. Your position at CTR will disappear in a couple of months.

Some of you keep saying this. It's really offensive that you think that anyone who likes Hillary must necessarily be paid. It makes me believe that the PP who thinks you're a Trump voter masquerading as a Sanders supporter is correct.

And oh my god, go back in the archives. We have done the "why I am voting for Hillary and you should, too" to death.

And it's offensive to me for someone to assume that anyone who objects to Hillary, and/or criticizes her in any way, is automatically a Trump supporter.

Nobody says you can't criticize Clinton, but the false equivalence is riduculous. Trump lies about everything all the time, he changes his positions faster than the weather, but Clinton is "dishonest" because she changed her position from what she thought 20 years ago. Clinton gets criticized for supporting the war on Iraq, Trump also supported the war, but nobody calls him on that lie.

Your argument fails because you are introducing things that are not in this discourse and you are assuming a hell of a lot as if it applies.

And this false equivalence is a cheap, and usually used by partisan Democrats here, cliche. If you want to base your vote on my candidate isn't as bad as the other, then that's your right.

So, get to the podium and debate and stop this comparison and false equivalence shit. If you can't do that then sit down.

This post doesn't make any sense.

Then sit down.

Yes Sir! Right away Sir! Why don't you just stop with the BS yourself? This is about Hillary beyond the caricature. Someone posted something positive about Hillary and all the Trumpkins and Steiniacs can do is shoot the messenger. If you just want to eat the crap the Republicans and the MSM feed you, enjoy it. If you want to see a real human being behind the 25 years of attacks, then do a little research.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:They don't want to get to know her, because that might challenge their deep misogyny.

Its just boggles my mind that many do not want to know Clinton, neither they want to truly understand Trump's despicable past, yet will claim Trump will save the world from the satanic Hillary.

I’ve been around long enough and paid attention closely enough to know that she is corrupt as hell, divisive as can be, and lacks the judgment to serve as president.

Well stated. +1

Different poster. But you haven't been long enough to understand that Trump has run a corrupt organization and is so incompetent that he has bankrupted so many of his businesses(Trump Uni, Trump realty, Trump airline, Trump casino etc). Trump has such a great judgement that he tweets like a 17 year old rotten teen. And he SELF FUNDS his campaign from money given by his conned supporters who find it their duty to give their lil money to their billionaire master.

It is very difficult for a party to win the third time and Hillary is not a good candidate. So it was the best time to bring on Kasich or Jeb or Rubio to win the election easily. But the party nominates Trump. Moderate Kasich voters like my extended family will not support a vulgarian like Trump.

Oh, it's the 'master' asshat poster again. Moving on...

Oh its the typical trumpster they can't refute or talk policies. its the Wall as a cure all. Moving on...

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:They don't want to get to know her, because that might challenge their deep misogyny.

In your view everyone is a misogynist. It is your new word, and you love using it.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It is fun to watch these posters (likely from Correct the Record) work so hard to try to convince some of us not to “throw away” our vote.
You might want to seek a real job. Your position at CTR will disappear in a couple of months.

Some of you keep saying this. It's really offensive that you think that anyone who likes Hillary must necessarily be paid. It makes me believe that the PP who thinks you're a Trump voter masquerading as a Sanders supporter is correct.

And oh my god, go back in the archives. We have done the "why I am voting for Hillary and you should, too" to death.

And it's offensive to me for someone to assume that anyone who objects to Hillary, and/or criticizes her in any way, is automatically a Trump supporter.

Nobody says you can't criticize Clinton, but the false equivalence is riduculous. Trump lies about everything all the time, he changes his positions faster than the weather, but Clinton is "dishonest" because she changed her position from what she thought 20 years ago. Clinton gets criticized for supporting the war on Iraq, Trump also supported the war, but nobody calls him on that lie.

Your argument fails because you are introducing things that are not in this discourse and you are assuming a hell of a lot as if it applies.

And this false equivalence is a cheap, and usually used by partisan Democrats here, cliche. If you want to base your vote on my candidate isn't as bad as the other, then that's your right.

So, get to the podium and debate and stop this comparison and false equivalence shit. If you can't do that then sit down.

This post doesn't make any sense.

Then sit down.

Yes Sir! Right away Sir! Why don't you just stop with the BS yourself? This is about Hillary beyond the caricature. Someone posted something positive about Hillary and all the Trumpkins and Steiniacs can do is shoot the messenger. If you just want to eat the crap the Republicans and the MSM feed you, enjoy it. If you want to see a real human being behind the 25 years of attacks, then do a little research.

Considering I was chastising for bringing Trump et al in this what are you talking about?
http://www.k12reader.com/subject/reading-skills/reading-comprehension/

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It is fun to watch these posters (likely from Correct the Record) work so hard to try to convince some of us not to “throw away” our vote.
You might want to seek a real job. Your position at CTR will disappear in a couple of months.

Some of you keep saying this. It's really offensive that you think that anyone who likes Hillary must necessarily be paid. It makes me believe that the PP who thinks you're a Trump voter masquerading as a Sanders supporter is correct.

And oh my god, go back in the archives. We have done the "why I am voting for Hillary and you should, too" to death.

And it's offensive to me for someone to assume that anyone who objects to Hillary, and/or criticizes her in any way, is automatically a Trump supporter.

Nobody says you can't criticize Clinton, but the false equivalence is riduculous. Trump lies about everything all the time, he changes his positions faster than the weather, but Clinton is "dishonest" because she changed her position from what she thought 20 years ago. Clinton gets criticized for supporting the war on Iraq, Trump also supported the war, but nobody calls him on that lie.

Your argument fails because you are introducing things that are not in this discourse and you are assuming a hell of a lot as if it applies.

And this false equivalence is a cheap, and usually used by partisan Democrats here, cliche. If you want to base your vote on my candidate isn't as bad as the other, then that's your right.

So, get to the podium and debate and stop this comparison and false equivalence shit. If you can't do that then sit down.

This post doesn't make any sense.

Then sit down.

Yes Sir! Right away Sir! Why don't you just stop with the BS yourself? This is about Hillary beyond the caricature. Someone posted something positive about Hillary and all the Trumpkins and Steiniacs can do is shoot the messenger. If you just want to eat the crap the Republicans and the MSM feed you, enjoy it. If you want to see a real human being behind the 25 years of attacks, then do a little research.

Considering I was chastising for bringing Trump et al in this what are you talking about?
http://www.k12reader.com/subject/reading-skills/reading-comprehension/

Do you even realize there are multiple posters on this thread and we are called "anonymous" so there is no way for me to tell whether you are the one who was chastised, and there is no way for you tell if I am the one who chastized you? I actually posted some positive reasons to vote for Hillary and it had the best impact I could hope for, that is, none whatsoever.

[Anonymous]

I am the OP. I specifically mentioned that "those who would like to know...". Why did it hurt Trumpkins? If you do not want to know its great, you can explore the thousand other threads. If you would like to start what good things Trump has done you certainly are welcome to start your own thread. Why are you obsessed with a thread which requires opening up the brain to understand that there are many who feel good about working with Hillary and respect her.

[Anonymous]

It was awesome when she voted for the Iraq war, was it not, OP?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:It was awesome when she voted for the Iraq war, was it not, OP?

It was not - but this is the wrong address you reached.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:It was awesome when she voted for the Iraq war, was it not, OP?

It was even more awesome when Trump came out against the war before it started.
http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/statements/2016/jun/22/donald-trump/trump-still-wrong-his-claim-opposed-iraq-war-ahead/

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It was awesome when she voted for the Iraq war, was it not, OP?

It was not - but this is the wrong address you reached.

The biggest foreign policy disaster in my lifetime and she was on the wrong side. Unforgivable.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It was awesome when she voted for the Iraq war, was it not, OP?

It was not - but this is the wrong address you reached.

The biggest foreign policy disaster in my lifetime and she was on the wrong side. Unforgivable.

So was Trump. Or you can vote for someone who never heard of Aleppo.