| I don't think the whole baby-boomer generation is selfish, but one thing's for sure, there are sure some giant sanctimonous assholes on DCUM. |
The bolded above is true, but OP's mom CAN help by staying home and looking after the kids, which is what OP wanted. Think again, PP. |
I have never heard a boomer say anything this insightful. I have heard complaints that the next generation isn't raising kids correctly or disciplining their kids, but always with a tone that they are just willful, never with an introspective tone of "wonder what I could have done differently/could do now to change things." |
I've been following this thread with thoughtful reflection until I saw this. This was uncalled for and way out of bounds. Your boomer relatives may be awful, but it looks like you are already there with awful, so it's clearly not a generational thing in your family. It's just your family personality- which is awful. |
|
I am younger baby boomer- more than willing to help out with my kid's needs at any time...and do. Most of my friends do as well. My friends who can't do it all are still in demanding jobs- the same ones we had when we were first raising all of you. Yes- we were expected to rise in our field, break glass ceiling barriers, bring home decent money and raise the kids all at the same time. So...you are all wrong about our level of commitment.
One thing I cannot stand is when someone takes an example that is pertinent to them and generalizes it to everything. It's not very intellectual. |
Not if it compromises their own health, no. In case of a "freaking emergency," OP should have a trusted babysitter (or 3) that she can call. And she should plan for that. |
Why would she expose herself to whatever gross germs the kids already have? Kids are walking bags of germs. Think again. |
| Honestly, as hateful as mothers of this generation are toward their parents, I can see why so many stay away from their kids an grandkids. Why would anyone chose to put up with the abuse? |
Because it's an emergency and sometimes, people put themselves out for those they profess to love. In this case, it isn't as if OP wants to go to the mall and expects her mother to subject herself to Ebola. I don't understand why this is such a difficult concept. If OP's mother REALLY wanted to help, she'd find a way to do it. Maybe OP's child could stay at grandma's house while OP tends to her DH? |
Does OP's mother have some kind of immunodeficiency that precludes her from interacting with people and going out in public? She has no problem being with her other grandchild, so how is she compromising her health by baby sitting OP's child? She wouldn't have to go to the hospital. Does it occur to you that it might be more of a comfort for the OP's child to be with the grandmother during this stressful time than with a "trusted" babysitter? Good Lord, don't break your legs jumping off your high horse.
|
+1000 It is indeed a phenomenon. |
It's this attitude that is the problem, not generation. I am an immigrant and American families are weird to me. Overly indulgent to small children, obsessed with pointless activities to the point of missing meetings to sit on some irrelevant game or such, but then all of a sudden, you are 18 and "nobody owes you anything". People hoard millions of dollars do that they can spend 15k month living In a village for old people only etc. I don't get it and I don't want to. |
|
My parents have dropped everything and drove 12 hours when we needed them.
It isn't the entire generation. |
+1 I agree, it is really sad. |
Sure, but the grandmother probably doesn't want to be with a disgusting germ source, so OP needs to find another plan. |