Me too. But with DC1 almost 4 now. |
Agree totally on above post. The newborn days were NOT fun for us. I know some people get lucky and love them but we did not. Nor did I love being pregnant. Now that my DS is 2, I love parenting and he is a total joy to be around. But wow, thinking about starting over with another baby - and adding in the high risk pregnancy (I would be due to some medical issues and age and previous premature birth with DS), and the newborn days...and it exhausts and terrifies me! |
Same but DS is almost 4. At this point, even if I got pregnant this month, there would be about a 5 year age gap between the 2. DS has had some relatively minor health/development issues and it has actually taken a lot out of us both emotionally and financially. My current train of thought is that we're better off sticking with the known rather than the unknown. I know this isn't a popular view, but it's the best choice for us. |
I'm in a similar boat at OP except leaning toward no. DD is fun and I am excited to be able to do more things with her as she gets older, but that would be hard with a newborn. And I had an easy pregnancy and baby, yet it was still exhausting. Can't imagine what a difficult pregnancy/baby while caring for a toddler would be like. DH and I make good money but are limited by large student loans, and I'd like to be able to pay for DD's college, which seems feasible with one but not two. |
I agree so much with the bolded. I have one (2.5) and am thinking about not having any more (original, vague plan, was to probably have 2). It bugs me to see so many people saying "just don't think too hard about it!" I get it-- I do. There's never a "perfect" time to have a kid, and you'll never be 100% sure you're making the right decision. But a lot of people just dive into it, and we so rarely truly regret having a child, once the child is here, so it's easy to feel like we must have made the "correct" decision, though there's no way of knowing that. Parents of 2 or more are almost always going to say they're happy they had more than one-- parents of one are going to say the same thing. But what bothers me are all the people saying "don't think too hard, because I didn't think too hard, and it all 'turned out fine.'" It's called avoidance of cognitive dissonance and it's strong when it's about a life you brought into the world (and love dearly). And yes, that avoidance of cognitive dissonance comes into play whether it really was the best decision you could have made-- or if it, just maybe, was not. |
This discussion came just when I was about to post something similar asking for insight. Husband and I have a one year old and want a second, but we're trying to figure out timing b/c I'm in my late 30s and will need to start Clomid again, if not attempt additional fertility options. If we started now, they would be two years apart but for me, that seems so soon. I'm really enjoying this time and don't want to have two potentially in diapers at the same time. Ideally, I'd like them to be three years apart but I know the timing doesn't always align. Plus, being older carries health risks and I don't want to be so old I can't enjoy future grandkids. Since we'll need to use fertility drugs, it could take a while so I'm trying to determine whether we just try and see what happens or wait a bit longer. Has anyone been in a similar situation? |
You have to decide this, it's a very personal choice. I can tell you that if I was in your shoes I'd start trying right away if there were fertility issues. If you are positive you want two, is it better to start early and have the other earlier than ideal or run the risk of waiting and...who knows how it might go? Anyway, that's me - but I also have my children spaced 2 years apart so obviously I'm in a different camp than some others on this thread. If you're sure you want two and would be heartbroken without, I'd start asap. |