To men who have seen prostitutes...

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Not every prostitute had/has a horrible life. Not every prostitute is forced into the business. You will be amazed by the every day regular guy that pays for sex. Why would he do that you say? Because he needs the discretion because he is married or has a high profile job. He just wants it to be a one time thing with no strings attached. He wants to fulfill any fantasies that he cant fulfill with his wife/girlfriend. The money he waste on wine and dining a female, he can just pay to her directly. He can pay and sleep with a female that he is attracted to. Emotions and a connection arent needed.

Lets just say i know something about the lifestyle.

Do you have an effective method for screening your whores to be sure they are voluntary?

No, because im the whore

Have you considered the ethics of contributing to an industry that promotes human trafficking? You make the profession look good to your johns. But that hurts other girls.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Not every prostitute had/has a horrible life. Not every prostitute is forced into the business. You will be amazed by the every day regular guy that pays for sex. Why would he do that you say? Because he needs the discretion because he is married or has a high profile job. He just wants it to be a one time thing with no strings attached. He wants to fulfill any fantasies that he cant fulfill with his wife/girlfriend. The money he waste on wine and dining a female, he can just pay to her directly. He can pay and sleep with a female that he is attracted to. Emotions and a connection arent needed.

Lets just say i know something about the lifestyle.

Do you have an effective method for screening your whores to be sure they are voluntary?

No, because im the whore

Have you considered the ethics of contributing to an industry that promotes human trafficking? You make the profession look good to your johns. But that hurts other girls.

Have you considered the ethics of buying products made by slaves in China, Bangladesh, Vietnam, etc? Almost all of us contribute to ugliness.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Hey wait, I am a woman who would be in market for male escort if one existed.

Why would you want to pay someone? You can't find someone without paying?

Seriously. Walk into a bar, down three shots and unbutton your blouse. i don't care what you look like, I guarantee you can get laid for free.

x2. And then you wont have to deal with the messy moral implications of... you know... paying someone to have sex with you.

And if that strategy worked for men, then prostitution wouldn't exist.

[Anonymous]

Years ago, I worked for a USAID contractor that worked in HIV/AIDS research and programming. We did a fair amount of published research on sex workers in South Africa. Without fail, every one of them went into the trade voluntarily. These women surveyed the options available to them without special skills, education, capital and undue exhaustion and concluded, quite reasonably, that being a prostitute for $100/day is a much better deal than stitching shoes or cleaning houses for $15/day. Not a single instance of coercion to be found.

I'm sure some women are trafficked into the trade. What you are discounting is that a big chunk, very big chunk of women who sell sex are doing it for the same reason you are a lawyer or a doctor - that's the best and the most profitable they can do with the assets they have. The only difference is that you have education, work ethics and long-term vision, and they don't. They aren't forced into it. They just aren't particularly motivated to do actual work for money, because fucking is easier and brings in more cash. It's not a good long-term strategy but not everyone looks long-term.

[Anonymous]

How is this political?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:As my friend (a frequent visitor to prositutes) always said: you don't pay them for sex, you pay for them not to call you the next day.

Really? If its so easy for you to get laid and have women all over your dick, why just not give out a fake number then? Or block them? Problem solved.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Legalization would solve most problems; Europe figured that long ago. They are more enlightened and far less prudish than the U.S. They laughed at America over the Lewinski "crisis."

Legalize it and it can be taxed and regulated. A win all around you must agree.

Uh huh. Because legalization totally solved the problem of human trafficking and the exploitation and mistreatment of women. Get real.

You know nothing about the actual practice of prostitution in Europe. Where, in fact, women are quite properly crusading to ban it.

x2

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Not every prostitute had/has a horrible life. Not every prostitute is forced into the business. You will be amazed by the every day regular guy that pays for sex. Why would he do that you say? Because he needs the discretion because he is married or has a high profile job. He just wants it to be a one time thing with no strings attached. He wants to fulfill any fantasies that he cant fulfill with his wife/girlfriend. The money he waste on wine and dining a female, he can just pay to her directly. He can pay and sleep with a female that he is attracted to. Emotions and a connection arent needed.

Lets just say i know something about the lifestyle.

Ah, the lie of the happy prostitute. Yes, every prostitute is just like Julia Roberts in Pretty Woman. Or at least most of them. They do it because they love men, not because they have a drug habit, or need to support children, or are trying to scramble out of property, or have an abusive pimp. Yes. You are so right. Which is why they will so happily fuck you when you dont pay them.

Men who delude themselves into thinking this is okay truly disgust me.

[Anonymous]

Matriarchal societies are best for everyone. When men have power and are put in charge of money, they tend to spend it on themselves for things like alcohol, drugs, gambling and prostitutes. Women tend to reinvest in the family which benefits society as a whole.

Just watched Katie Couric as she moderates a panel at the World Economic Forum in Davos. The discussion, "Ending Poverty through Parity," focuses on how to invest in women and girls around the world.

http://news.yahoo.com/video/world-economic-forum-2015-katie-230000556.html

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Matriarchal societies are best for everyone. When men have power and are put in charge of money, they tend to spend it on themselves for things like alcohol, drugs, gambling and prostitutes. Women tend to reinvest in the family which benefits society as a whole.

Just watched Katie Couric as she moderates a panel at the World Economic Forum in Davos. The discussion, "Ending Poverty through Parity," focuses on how to invest in women and girls around the world.

http://news.yahoo.com/video/world-economic-forum-2015-katie-230000556.html

Serious question. If matriarchal societies are best, then why aren't most societies matriarchal? Shouldn't there be an evolutionary / survival of the fittest angle here that fits?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Matriarchal societies are best for everyone. When men have power and are put in charge of money, they tend to spend it on themselves for things like alcohol, drugs, gambling and prostitutes. Women tend to reinvest in the family which benefits society as a whole.

Just watched Katie Couric as she moderates a panel at the World Economic Forum in Davos. The discussion, "Ending Poverty through Parity," focuses on how to invest in women and girls around the world.

http://news.yahoo.com/video/world-economic-forum-2015-katie-230000556.html

Serious question. If matriarchal societies are best, then why aren't most societies matriarchal? Shouldn't there be an evolutionary / survival of the fittest angle here that fits?

Oh gosh, more bullshit evolutionary theory. please.

Also, things are different now. Obviously, men generally fare better in hand to hand combat. But we have seen a rapid change in gender roles since warfare technology became more advanced.

Now, with most work becoming digital and not labor based, I think we will see a complete reversal of the gender power balance. Women are now being rated as smarter than men, they graduate college in much higher percentages, and the wage gap is predicted to be reversed soon.

SOURCE

While matriarchy is already a reality in some societies, I think before long it will be the norm for the west.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Matriarchal societies are best for everyone. When men have power and are put in charge of money, they tend to spend it on themselves for things like alcohol, drugs, gambling and prostitutes. Women tend to reinvest in the family which benefits society as a whole.

Just watched Katie Couric as she moderates a panel at the World Economic Forum in Davos. The discussion, "Ending Poverty through Parity," focuses on how to invest in women and girls around the world.

http://news.yahoo.com/video/world-economic-forum-2015-katie-230000556.html

Yes. Very true.

If you have not read this article yet: http://www.theatlantic.com/business/archive/2015/01/the-secret-to-smart-groups-isnt-smart-people/384625/ Please do. It is heartening.

Also this awesome article on matriarchy: http://jezebel.com/here-is-what-its-like-when-women-have-slightly-more-pow-1638239831

I will definitely watch the Yahoo video. Exciting changes are happening.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Matriarchal societies are best for everyone. When men have power and are put in charge of money, they tend to spend it on themselves for things like alcohol, drugs, gambling and prostitutes. Women tend to reinvest in the family which benefits society as a whole.

Just watched Katie Couric as she moderates a panel at the World Economic Forum in Davos. The discussion, "Ending Poverty through Parity," focuses on how to invest in women and girls around the world.

http://news.yahoo.com/video/world-economic-forum-2015-katie-230000556.html

Serious question. If matriarchal societies are best, then why aren't most societies matriarchal? Shouldn't there be an evolutionary / survival of the fittest angle here that fits?

Oh gosh, more bullshit evolutionary theory. please.

Also, things are different now. Obviously, men generally fare better in hand to hand combat. But we have seen a rapid change in gender roles since warfare technology became more advanced.

Now, with most work becoming digital and not labor based, I think we will see a complete reversal of the gender power balance. Women are now being rated as smarter than men, they graduate college in much higher percentages, and the wage gap is predicted to be reversed soon.

SOURCE

While matriarchy is already a reality in some societies, I think before long it will be the norm for the west.

so because you think it, it must be, got it. And look, I made my point by not insulting you.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Matriarchal societies are best for everyone. When men have power and are put in charge of money, they tend to spend it on themselves for things like alcohol, drugs, gambling and prostitutes. Women tend to reinvest in the family which benefits society as a whole.

Just watched Katie Couric as she moderates a panel at the World Economic Forum in Davos. The discussion, "Ending Poverty through Parity," focuses on how to invest in women and girls around the world.

http://news.yahoo.com/video/world-economic-forum-2015-katie-230000556.html

Serious question. If matriarchal societies are best, then why aren't most societies matriarchal? Shouldn't there be an evolutionary / survival of the fittest angle here that fits?

Oh gosh, more bullshit evolutionary theory. please.

Also, things are different now. Obviously, men generally fare better in hand to hand combat. But we have seen a rapid change in gender roles since warfare technology became more advanced.

Now, with most work becoming digital and not labor based, I think we will see a complete reversal of the gender power balance. Women are now being rated as smarter than men, they graduate college in much higher percentages, and the wage gap is predicted to be reversed soon.

SOURCE

While matriarchy is already a reality in some societies, I think before long it will be the norm for the west.

so because you think it, it must be, got it. And look, I made my point by not insulting you.

Did you even read the article?

let me guess- no. Because you dont want to read any facts that would contradict the narrative youve constructed in your head. Pathetic.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Matriarchal societies are best for everyone. When men have power and are put in charge of money, they tend to spend it on themselves for things like alcohol, drugs, gambling and prostitutes. Women tend to reinvest in the family which benefits society as a whole.

Just watched Katie Couric as she moderates a panel at the World Economic Forum in Davos. The discussion, "Ending Poverty through Parity," focuses on how to invest in women and girls around the world.

http://news.yahoo.com/video/world-economic-forum-2015-katie-230000556.html

Serious question. If matriarchal societies are best, then why aren't most societies matriarchal? Shouldn't there be an evolutionary / survival of the fittest angle here that fits?

Oh gosh, more bullshit evolutionary theory. please.

Also, things are different now. Obviously, men generally fare better in hand to hand combat. But we have seen a rapid change in gender roles since warfare technology became more advanced.

Now, with most work becoming digital and not labor based, I think we will see a complete reversal of the gender power balance. Women are now being rated as smarter than men, they graduate college in much higher percentages, and the wage gap is predicted to be reversed soon.

SOURCE

While matriarchy is already a reality in some societies, I think before long it will be the norm for the west.

so because you think it, it must be, got it. And look, I made my point by not insulting you.

Did you even read the article?

let me guess- no. Because you dont want to read any facts that would contradict the narrative youve constructed in your head. Pathetic.

settle down, sally. you've made a lot of assumptions based on nothing. sounds like a winning formula to me.