I agree with this too. I take one step back and question OP's premise of why you feel you want to or have to go to BigLaw. If you have good reasons, so be it. But after 20 yrs. as a senior manager in a federal enforcement agency, I've seen hundreds of BigLaw associates, counsel & partners applying for staff attorney positions because they want out of the BigLaw rat race. I've worked in non-profits, private practice and govt., so have some perspective on each. Don't limit yourself (IMO) to BigLaw and your options multiply. If it happens down the line and that's what you want, fine. My experience is probably not too relevant now because I've been at it a long time but I was Top 35% at a T-20/T-30 law school and was a Moot Court Director. Started with 2 yrs. trial experience as a public defender, then 3 yrs. appellate experience at another well regarded public defender firm. Tried 30 cases and argued 40 appeals (state appellate and supreme court and cert. petitions @ U.S. Supreme Ct.) in my first 5 years of practice, which was leverage to a medium sized private firm (civil litigation and appeals in state & fed courts). From there, a staff attorney position in OGC at a well known fed. agency. In 3 yrs. thanks to case work there got a supervisory position and was a manager for 23 yrs. including sr. management of a 340-person office with nationwide presence. I don't know if in today's legal climate, that's a workable path, but it is part of what the PP who gave such good advice describes as an option. Good luck. |
I don't really think this is sound advice. First, I think it's a common mistake to think it's easier to get into big law outside of NYC and DC. I started my practice in Atlanta and people from NY and DC would often imply it was easier to get a job at a top Atl for than a top DC firm. But basic logic doesn't bear that out. If you want to work at a top 50 firm in NY, something like 46 have an office there. In DC, it is something like 48. If you want to work at a top 50 firm in Atlanta, you have precisely one firm that can give you a job. There are more lawyers in NY than Atlanta, but nowhere near 46 times as many. The top firms can be insanely selective. Second, the federal clerkship thing seems like a pipe dream. Less than 50% of big law associates could obtain a Federal clerkship, so the idea of using a clerkship to get into big law doesn't really make much sense. It's like saying "if you want to be partner at a mid-size firm, you should become a partner at Cravath because then a ton of mid-size firms will hire you." That's true, but it's not really a helpful strategy. |
Well it did work for me. (Sorry for the typos in the earlier post). Memphis to DC. |
really, do not do that unless you want to make sure you are labeled as a nut case who has no clue about the world, and never have the possibility to get a job in a law firm in DC ( and maybe getting a restraining order against you - great for your DC Bar application) . hiring partners at BigLaw are very busy people who also find time to interview people who have already been selected among a lot of students through a specific hiring process. Big law firms hire their first year associate only through the summer associate program (I work for one, we already know who the first year associates are for next year, they have already been hired). in recent years, the number of first year associate has really decreased (we had 18-20 ten years ago with two offices, now with 4 offices we have around 10). in my practice the last first year was hired 4 years ago. firms tend to hire laterally now, first year are expensive and clients more and more do not want them on their matters. unless you have special skills (patent attorney with PHD in some science, adjunct professor at Johns Hopkins and so on) it is going to be hard to get a job at BigLaw if you already do not have an offer. so put the stalking aside, and follow other very good advice you got in this thread, including networking, trying to get a job at your current firm and then work hard and shine. depending on the field you chose, working for the government can also be useful to later go into private practice. it's a very tough and competitive world. |
When I graduated, which was admittedly 7 years ago, I could not get a job at a DA's office to save my life, though I did get offers from top 50 firms, and a federal clerkship after I worked at one of said firms for a year and hated it. It was truly disheartening since I went to law school with the aspiration of becoming a DA, and interned at the DA's office during school. No offices in the multiple cites I applied in were hiring. I'm not sure this is necessarily an easier path than a firm. |
I did this. I graduated around median from a T50 (although I was on law review -- I was just lazy and didn't care much about my grades). I worked for a solo who did management-side labor and employment. I got all kinds of great experience and now work at one of the national L&E firms. I think this is probably the only realistic way OP can eventually wind up at a big firm, because s/he isn't getting an offer with those grades from a T30. |
I did not mean to make it sound like getting a job at a DA was a piece of cake. I do think that in a lot of regions of the country it is less grade sensitive than are firms or federal judges (not because its easier, but because the office cares more about characteristics other than class rank). So it is plausible to me that with the right background, someone who has no shot at a large firm job could be a plausible candidate at a DA's office. |
your advice is excellent; however the OP just doesn't seem to be anything special. |
actually, as the secretary of the hiring partner, she can weigh in very well on OP's plan to get a job by trying to meet that partner. where does your snarky comment come from? |
That's fair - e.g., maybe someone who won the moot court competition but didn't have the very tippy top grades would be considered by the DA but not a large firm. I personally found it a lot tougher than getting a firm job, but maybe they were just looking for something different than firms were. |
I am in charge of hiring at a place where lots of young lawyers want to work. This is less crazy than the stalking idea, but I have to say that, if I met with everyone who asked me for an "informational" interview, I would never get any work done. I love helping young people find jobs, and used to do this with pretty much anyone who asked, but, as the job market has gotten worse, the number of requests is just out of hand. OP needs to understand that even this may be annoying to those he/she will ask. The bottom line is that there are lots of highly qualified lawyers with experience who are looking for work. I really can't tell someone who is fresh out of school how to compete with those people, because they can't. My advice is the same that I give to those who call me -- take any job/internship you can get that is remotely close to the field you want to be in, and do the very best job you can, and hope you impress someone. |
| Not sure why big law is so attractive. It's really grueling and most new associates leave. |
NP here- Is it just me or is the DCUM holiday spirit particularly nasty? What necessitated this statement? You just wanted to put down a complete stranger? |
The statement is necessitated by the fact that his ambitions are sky high while he has no notable accomplishments whatsoever. He needs to forget about Big Law and think whether he can get a job, any job. |
| I don't want to make you feel discouraged, but I am on the Legal Honors hiring committee for a federal agency (and not one of the popular ones like DOJ or State). It has been years since we hired anyone with below median grades. We get such a high quality applicant pool that we are able to hire new attorneys from top schools with top grades, law review/moot court and usually some kind of relevant work experience. I don't think you're going to have the luxury of being picky in this legal market. |