Sorry, forgot to add that we could not possibly afford private school tuition for the number of kids we have. And as a non-white family with one wage earner who works for the feds while the educations we obtained for ourselves were elite, we did not do it on our own dimes. |
I don't think success should be measured by how many kids get kicked out. taking public funds and then cherrypicking is not a marker of a succesful program |
I am also a non-white family with a very high achieving DC. I hope you are public with your views at Basis so we can avoid you and your family like the plague. I don't want these views rubbing off on my DC. We are not part of the "I got mine; you get yours" mindset. We are part of the "a rising tide lifts all boats" mindset. |
I'm personally fine with a challenging program, I just think there needs to be another path for students who aren't prepared for it. If 25% of the class can handle the advanced curriculum then it's terrific that it is available for them. However, there needs to be an alternative set of choices for the 75% who are dropping out. Some kids may be several years ahead in math, but fairly average in reading. Let them focus their energy where they excel. I like this about the IB Program. What I don't like seeing on the taxpayer dime is 75% of students being counseled out - there should be less intense options which keep them in the school. I wouldn't be surprised if this a path which the PCSB is going to coerce or force Basis down, one way or another. |
|
With regard to YY, I'm not a hater, but we will decline a spot if offered (and DH did stand in line at the crack of dawn). I find it very off-putting that at the various events (charter expo, open house) there have never been any parents or educators there to answer questions. And when I've asked existing parents, some (admittedly, not all) have said, "If you have questions, then go somewhere else. There are enough people who want the slot that we don't have to explain ourselves to you." We all take our children's education seriously, and committing to mandarin is a big deal (as YY families always warn on here), so I think it is entirely appropriate that I may have questions for the principal/teachers/parents. I did not appreciate the fact that when I have availed myself of opportunities to learn about the school, those questions have gone unanswered, sometimes with a very obnoxious reply.
|
Where are you getting your numbers, PP? Where did you head that 75% are dropping out? |
It's nowhere even remotely near that. Please stop making stuff up. |
DCPS is not providing for the needs of advanced learners, so DCPS fails there, and they likewise fail if the only option for getting something meeting those needs is via private school, which many of us cannot afford. Charters fill the gaps that DCPS has not filled, they accommodate those whose needs DCPS has not met. |
That's fine as long as the Charters are inclusive and not exclusive. Any school that basis (no pun intended) its formula for success on attrition is by definition not being inclusive. |
Since you are going to decline anyway, how about calling the school and taking yourself off the waitlist. |
I'm really puzzled by this statement, Jeff, because I don't think you actually mean this. Do you have a problem with St. Coletta's, the charter that serves an exclusively special-needs population? Do you have a problem with Options, one of the oldest charters in the city, which serves a high-risk student body population that has not been able to succeed in traditional schools? What about Roots? From the very beginning of the charter school movement, charters have been developed, approved and operated to serve specific sub-sets of the city school age population. And yet you really seem only to object when the specific sub-set is better educated or more advanced than the average. |
Well, honestly I don't know much about those other schools but I would object if they are routinely letting people fall out of their programs as a way of improving them. Charters already get a deserved-in-many-cases reputation for dumping their problem students as soon as the cut-off date passes and letting the neighborhood schools deal with them. This is something that I believe should be corrected. Obviously, I'm going to object when that actually becomes a selling point for a school. |
Good question, I have not done that yet because I have been holding out hope that if we actually got in someone might give a crap about answering my questions, and perhaps I would be suitably impressed despite my initial misgivings. So I haven't wanted to close off the option since many folks do speak so highly of it. |
We will be joining the school this year and have not had this experience (not that I am doubting you, PP). I even found some of the DCUM threads about supporting kids in Mandarin when you don't speak it at home to be helpful for getting a range of opinions and experiences. I am fortunate to be friendly enough with two sets of parents (one Mandarin-speaking, one not) to get honest feedback and I have never felt like my questions were dismissed. I hear a lot about the zone of secrecy at YY and have yet to see it. |
Agree. Of course a school shouldn't actively be trying to get rid of students, but I don't see what's inherently wrong with a charter school that tries to provide an extremely (for DC) challenging curriculum. DCPS parents complain continually that DCPS is trying to teach to the bottom third of the class while providing little for the top third. Must all charters do the same? Maybe as Basis gets a little more established, parents will self-select a little better, like they do with the immersion options. My child, for example, would not do well at Basis, so we won't bother applying. |