Soledad O'Brien destroys a Republican idiot

Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:I just don't understand the name-calling in threads like this, from both sides. Is this really the example you're setting for your kids?
"Panty snifffer" is not name-calling in the classic sense, but rather identifying the writer as a prolific poster on DCUM, who delights in inanely provocative comments that, sad to say, draw many of us into silly arguments. Whether he (or she) is serious or playing games, is an adult or a kid, or someone who just won't take those meds, nobody knows.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:I just don't understand the name-calling in threads like this, from both sides. Is this really the example you're setting for your kids?
"Panty snifffer" is not name-calling in the classic sense, but rather identifying the writer as a prolific poster on DCUM, who delights in inanely provocative comments that, sad to say, draw many of us into silly arguments. Whether he (or she) is serious or playing games, is an adult or a kid, or someone who just won't take those meds, nobody knows.



Sure, but that content diminishes the quality of our adult conversations. Whether you agree with me or not, I want to hear what you think and how you've come to your conclusions. When the dialogs become too ridiculous many people who I want to hear from stop participating and that's unfortunate.
Anonymous
Good for her! So the answer is, we oppose the appointment because we are mad at the white house.
post reply Forum Index » Political Discussion
Message Quick Reply
Go to: