I f*cking hate pandas

Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:I hate cats.


A good house cat can be a valuable thing to have around. We are mouse and cave cricket free year round.
Anonymous
This post reminds me of FU Penguin. Ah, good times.

http://www.fupenguin.com
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:I hate how the white fur around their butts is always brown.


hahahaha thats hilarious
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:I hate cats.


A good house cat can be a valuable thing to have around. We are mouse and cave cricket free year round.


My dogs take care of those stupid cave crickets too.
Anonymous
This thread reminded me of Sexual Harassment Panda, from 'South Park'. This episode must be ten years old, or so..
Anonymous
OP , please ignor the trolls. I love your post, regardless if I agree with you or not.
Anonymous
It is true that they get a lot of attention. Actually that most animals get so much attention.
Anonymous
I wish pandas ate birds. I fucking hate birds. So creepy, so loud, so dirty, and so creepy.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:I wish they would go extinct. Which is apparently what they want, too, since they are so spectacularly bad at reproducing.

They are too incompetent and lazy to have sex, so tell me why we should be wasting scientific funding on getting a big fat loser raccoon species to bump uglies? And when it inevitably doesn't happen, why are we spending more research money to artificially knock these craptacular dopes up? It's not like we can ever release them back into the wild, because they'll just promptly go extinct due to their middle-school-nerd level prowess with the opposite sex. So it's not like we're doing anything other than preserving an expensive, shitty, perpetually-owned-by-China zoo freeloader. I'd rather spend that money and resources on one of the hundreds of animal species that go extinct every day that would actually attempt NOT to go extinct, if given the chance.

P.S. I'm a bleeding-heart liberal and I love animals. I just F*CKING HATE PANDAS.


+1


+2. OP makes some really good points, here, people. Haven't you ever had to shove through 100 people in 100 degree weather only to end up seeing a blob of stupid sleeping panda in a cushy air conditioned room in the National Zoo?
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:This post reminds me of FU Penguin. Ah, good times.

http://www.fupenguin.com


You beat me to it . Love FU penguin.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:I wish they would go extinct. Which is apparently what they want, too, since they are so spectacularly bad at reproducing.

They are too incompetent and lazy to have sex, so tell me why we should be wasting scientific funding on getting a big fat loser raccoon species to bump uglies? And when it inevitably doesn't happen, why are we spending more research money to artificially knock these craptacular dopes up? It's not like we can ever release them back into the wild, because they'll just promptly go extinct due to their middle-school-nerd level prowess with the opposite sex. So it's not like we're doing anything other than preserving an expensive, shitty, perpetually-owned-by-China zoo freeloader. I'd rather spend that money and resources on one of the hundreds of animal species that go extinct every day that would actually attempt NOT to go extinct, if given the chance.

P.S. I'm a bleeding-heart liberal and I love animals. I just F*CKING HATE PANDAS.


I agree, they're nothing but welfare bears. They aren't that cute, too lazy to hunt (unless you consider bamboo prey) and I heard they smell like a combination of menthol cigarettes and potato salad.


Yes. This. All this. A thousand times this.
Anonymous
Immature people
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:I hate cats.


A good house cat can be a valuable thing to have around. We are mouse and cave cricket free year round.


A good outdoor cat is also quite valuable. They'll take down more creepy, loud, dirty birds that way.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:I wish they would go extinct. Which is apparently what they want, too, since they are so spectacularly bad at reproducing.

They are too incompetent and lazy to have sex, so tell me why we should be wasting scientific funding on getting a big fat loser raccoon species to bump uglies? And when it inevitably doesn't happen, why are we spending more research money to artificially knock these craptacular dopes up? It's not like we can ever release them back into the wild, because they'll just promptly go extinct due to their middle-school-nerd level prowess with the opposite sex. So it's not like we're doing anything other than preserving an expensive, shitty, perpetually-owned-by-China zoo freeloader. I'd rather spend that money and resources on one of the hundreds of animal species that go extinct every day that would actually attempt NOT to go extinct, if given the chance.

P.S. I'm a bleeding-heart liberal and I love animals. I just F*CKING HATE PANDAS.


I agree, they're nothing but welfare bears. They aren't that cute, too lazy to hunt (unless you consider bamboo prey) and I heard they smell like a combination of menthol cigarettes and potato salad.


Yes. This. All this. A thousand times this.


That's what happens when you're raised in a communist country.

post reply Forum Index » Off-Topic
Message Quick Reply
Go to: