Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:As a guy, I never understood the hairless vaj trend and always hated it.
On the other hand, hair anywhere else— especially face, armpits or nipples—is a huge turnoff. Even the vaj, really, should be waxed down below with the bush only on top.
Now that I say it out loud, I guess I really don’t like hair on women except for a triangle above the hooha. Oh well.
Honestly, attitudes like this are one reason I stopped waxing. Because yes, some men prefer women who are mostly hairless except for some very specifically groomed hair for aesthetics. But like this PP, they'll start out claiming they don't mind hair, and actually hat the "hairless trend." I think this is because they rightfully know that some people speculate that a preference for hairlessness is a sign of pedophilia.
But then they'll go on to detail a level of hairless that, for most women, will cost thousands of dollars a year and require a ton of effort and logistics. Simply keeping the pubic area waxed (PLUS maintaining a perfect "triangle" of hair above, as though most women's hair grows in a perfect triangle) would mean, for me, monthly waxing appointments, weekly trimming and treatment of the skin to prevent ingrown. And my reward for this is that I get to have sex with a man who is merely satisfied with this level of effort, who views it as simply appropriate and bare minimum. Excuse me but: f*** no.
I trim and shave as I see fit, do not wax at all because it's too expensive and time consuming, and any man who doesn't like it can move right along. You want a doll who dedicates her entire life to making sure her body looks exactly the way some man wants it to, hire a prostitute. I'm a person and I am too busy and interesting for this BS.