Please vote for Newt

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Please vote for Newt so that we will have the best entertainment during the presidential debates. Will love to see him debate with Obama (a level headed, ethical, educated, and energetic candidate). Everyone will stop watching reality TV shows for a month or two!

You are insane because in a general election many people would vote for him as a vote against Obama.

Absolutely. Obama would probably win the popular vote by something like 60/40.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I love that the DCUMers are so self centered to think they their primary will make a difference in the nomination process. At least have a general concept of the process before thinking you can manipulate it.

Really, if with 8 votes Romney was erroneously counted as Iowa winner, then why cannot DCUM voters influence the primary results for MD and DC?

That is why I told you to have a clue about the process before thinking you can manipulate it. Wonder why no one is talking about the Maine primary (this coming weekend) or the Alaska caucuses? Becuase they aren't big state with large amount of delegates. Maryland and DC are just a blip on the radar screen which don't count for much. The early races with small amount of delegates -- Iowa, NH, etc. are big news because they start widdling down the field. MD and DC not only don't bring many delegates they are after 33 others states have already held their primaries and on a day when TX is having theirs. TX has 155 delegates, no one care what MD or DC does.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I love that the DCUMers are so self centered to think they their primary will make a difference in the nomination process. At least have a general concept of the process before thinking you can manipulate it.

Really, if with 8 votes Romney was erroneously counted as Iowa winner, then why cannot DCUM voters influence the primary results for MD and DC?

That is why I told you to have a clue about the process before thinking you can manipulate it. Wonder why no one is talking about the Maine primary (this coming weekend) or the Alaska caucuses? Becuase they aren't big state with large amount of delegates. Maryland and DC are just a blip on the radar screen which don't count for much. The early races with small amount of delegates -- Iowa, NH, etc. are big news because they start widdling down the field. MD and DC not only don't bring many delegates they are after 33 others states have already held their primaries and on a day when TX is having theirs. TX has 155 delegates, no one care what MD or DC does.

Given that the strategy of 2 of the 4 remaining candidates is a brokered convention, I'd say every little bit counts.

And it's whittling. Widdling sounds like something Elmer Fudd would say.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Please vote for Newt so that we will have the best entertainment during the presidential debates. Will love to see him debate with Obama (a level headed, ethical, educated, and energetic candidate). Everyone will stop watching reality TV shows for a month or two!

You are insane because in a general election many people would vote for him as a vote against Obama.

I am so hurt that you call me insane, when "they" are the one who would vote for Newt against Obama?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I love that the DCUMers are so self centered to think they their primary will make a difference in the nomination process. At least have a general concept of the process before thinking you can manipulate it.

Really, if with 8 votes Romney was erroneously counted as Iowa winner, then why cannot DCUM voters influence the primary results for MD and DC?

That is why I told you to have a clue about the process before thinking you can manipulate it. Wonder why no one is talking about the Maine primary (this coming weekend) or the Alaska caucuses? Becuase they aren't big state with large amount of delegates. Maryland and DC are just a blip on the radar screen which don't count for much. The early races with small amount of delegates -- Iowa, NH, etc. are big news because they start widdling down the field. MD and DC not only don't bring many delegates they are after 33 others states have already held their primaries and on a day when TX is having theirs. TX has 155 delegates, no one care what MD or DC does.

Given that the strategy of 2 of the 4 remaining candidates is a brokered convention, I'd say every little bit counts.

And it's whittling. Widdling sounds like something Elmer Fudd would say.

Candidates can have any strategy they want -- doesn't mean their wish will come true. Get off HuffPost and actually know the process.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Careful what you wish for people. The latest Gallup poll has Newt up within the GOP, and both Romney & Gingrich only lose to Obama by 2% in the general. If the economy should tank this summer or fall, the GOP nominee may win, Obama is hanging on a tenuous reed. I'd much rather a President Romney than a President Gingrich.

You really think Americans are dumb enough to vote for Newt as President! You are underestimating the collective intelligence of American people! Gallop polls or not, Obama is the president till 2016.

Same country that voted for GW - twice?