If it were that easy, HRT wouldn't be this popular. |
No, she told me to pick my dosage and tossed in a magnum of champagne. That’s how it generally goes, right? |
Given that people claim basically everything is a menopause symptom, it’s not possible to list everything unless you tell me the specific one. |
Lol. Right. |
Try an 8 ounce glass of soy milk once a day, adding a meal with tofu on the days where you are really feeling it. |
--joint pain/stiffness --skin problems - dryness, itching, rashes - have tried all types of lotions of course --dry eyes --terrible fatigue even after 8 hours of sleep --poor concentration/memory affecting work --osteopenia - calcium supplements make me constipated, ugh! --cholesterol - had plaque on a calcium scan I already take: an SSRI, Magnesium supplement, Crestor, and cyclosporine (for dry eye). |
| 0.4% lol WTF kind of garbage conclusion is that and estrogen apparently lowers your risk LOL - scientist |
| The original women's study was very, very flawed. Unlike most science, it was not replicated and was stopped before the total pre-planed data capture was complete. You can read all about it and the criticism of that study goes back about 30 years. |
Stay on it. That flawed study being stopped early and the resulting publications was meant to scare you and cause pain and discomfort to women. |
Stop lying. The study is actually ongoing. |
Exercise, eyedrops and warm compresses, CBT and acceptance. Maybe a statin. The problem is also that other than osteopenia, the evidence for HRT helping any of those listed conditions is extremely thin. I’m sure there is a placebo effect though. But at the end of the day, the fatigue of chemo and radiation would be a hell of a lot worse. |
|
Somebody asked for a citation. For those of you skeptical of this administration, please let me assure you that women's health advocates have been trying to reverse this for decades.
Here's the money shot: Women have used HRT products for decades to relieve menopausal symptoms. However, their use plummeted in the early 2000s when the FDA applied boxed warnings following a Women’s Health Initiative study that found a statistically non-significant increase in the risk of breast cancer diagnosis. Here's think HHS link: https://www.fda.gov/news-events/press-announcements/hhs-advances-womens-health-removes-misleading-fda-warnings-hormone-replacement-therapy Here's a users guide from a well regarded women's health nonprofit. https://swhr.org/resources/menopause-preparedness-toolkit-a-womans-empowerment-guide/ |
Obtuse. That part of the study stopped in the early 2000s and you either know it and don't care or don't know which makes every thing you say suspect. |
Np - my menopause symptoms would need to be very severe and impacting my quality of life to take that risk. I’ve just completed my 5th round of chemo with radiation on the horizon. What’s the point of a few weeks of HRT? |
They’re still analyzing the data and coming up with new conclusions. And there are plenty of other studies on HRT. Of all the dumb parts of this discussion, claiming that there is some kind of conspiracy theory to hurt women is the dumbest. |