Are Charles and William doing enough about Andrew's pedo revelations?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I am genuinely baffled why a modern country like the UK continues to shovel millions of pounds to these relics and inbred degenerates.

Yes, why can’t they be more like Hunter & Joe?

I'm sorry did Hunter rape a child and then continue to live in a taxpayer funded mansion waited on hand and foot? I must have missed that news story.

[Anonymous]

No. Meanwhile I'm supposed to hate Meghan Markle for...reasons.

And sorry, but I'll never buy that William and Kate hate him and are just biding their time until Will's king and can banish him, if he's still alive. People who hate someone and are just biding their time typically don't give that someone a ride to Christmas dinner.

Bizarre to have a young daughter and cape for your creepy uncle but whatever. Kate and William are modernizing the monarchy, one excuse for Andrew at a time!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:No. Meanwhile I'm supposed to hate Meghan Markle for...reasons.

And sorry, but I'll never buy that William and Kate hate him and are just biding their time until Will's king and can banish him, if he's still alive. People who hate someone and are just biding their time typically don't give that someone a ride to Christmas dinner.

Bizarre to have a young daughter and cape for your creepy uncle but whatever. Kate and William are modernizing the monarchy, one excuse for Andrew at a time!

This x 10000. Anyone who believes Kate and William GAF about Andrew need to have their heads examined.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:No. Meanwhile I'm supposed to hate Meghan Markle for...reasons.

And sorry, but I'll never buy that William and Kate hate him and are just biding their time until Will's king and can banish him, if he's still alive. People who hate someone and are just biding their time typically don't give that someone a ride to Christmas dinner.

Bizarre to have a young daughter and cape for your creepy uncle but whatever. Kate and William are modernizing the monarchy, one excuse for Andrew at a time!

This x 10000. Anyone who believes Kate and William GAF about Andrew need to have their heads examined.

Exactly. There's literally a video of William and Andrew chuckling next to each other at some church service a couple months ago.

I strongly dislike my aunt. She's nowhere near Andrew status but she's a rude jerk, she makes everything political (I'll leave you to guess WHAT her politics are) and she's just generally unpleasant to be around. She once asked me how my bf was knowing damn well he had dumped me in a violent outburst a few weeks before lmfao.

I don't giggle with her when I'm forced to be around her.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I care not one whit about what Charles and William are doing about Andrew. Much more concerning is what we are doing (or not doing) about Trump.

+1
Does it really matter? So he'll go from one paid-for estate with staff, meals, drivers to a smaller estate with staff, meals, drivers? Boo hoo. They should make him live on an estate (a real UK estate which is the projects) and do community service and earn his keep.

It is very concerning that we have a pedophile in the WH that everyone is intent on protecting. To the point that our government is shut down. It defies any rational logic. We have shut down governance of the biggest economy on earth to protect someone who abused CHILDREN. Sexually abused them. They had no agency or recourse. They were children.

+2. We need to clean our own house, Americans.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I know it’s the new trendy word, but pedophiles like pre puberty children, not 17 year olds.

So she was trafficked by Epstein and Maxwell, but that's OK because she wasn't 12?

I feel like Andrew knows a lot about the Epstein/Maxwell operation, including other rich men who visited the island or Epstein's house at the times he was there, including even Trump. Andrew needs to answer questions.

Meanwhile, Trump has moved Maxwell to a cushy women's prison in exchange for, what, exactly?

- OP

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I think they’ve responded well. Practically speaking, he’s been living in exile on Windsor grounds where they can keep an eye on him, control who comes and goes, and essentially mitigate/eliminate future risk. Smart move imho.

They are now relegating him to smaller digs but keeping him under their watchful eye on Windsor grounds.

I doubt you will see him or Fergie anywhere public

I can see how they’d want to ensure that no minors enter the property, etc. The whole business makes me feel ill. I hope we never lay eyes on him again. Not even Charles’s funeral.

Once Charles is gone William will have Andrew and Fergie put out with yesterday’s trash.

William is reported to have a lot of skeletons in his own closet. There's no way he's going to treat Andrew so roughly that Andrew needs to earn income by writing his own tell-all. That's why William is blowing smoke up the tabloids' butts by playing a tough guy who got Andrew to stop using his titles (not stripping the titles), which is pretty meaningless.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:No. Meanwhile I'm supposed to hate Meghan Markle for...reasons.

And sorry, but I'll never buy that William and Kate hate him and are just biding their time until Will's king and can banish him, if he's still alive. People who hate someone and are just biding their time typically don't give that someone a ride to Christmas dinner.

Bizarre to have a young daughter and cape for your creepy uncle but whatever. Kate and William are modernizing the monarchy, one excuse for Andrew at a time!

This x 10000. Anyone who believes Kate and William GAF about Andrew need to have their heads examined.

+2, or +20000, whichever.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I care not one whit about what Charles and William are doing about Andrew. Much more concerning is what we are doing (or not doing) about Trump.

+1
Does it really matter? So he'll go from one paid-for estate with staff, meals, drivers to a smaller estate with staff, meals, drivers? Boo hoo. They should make him live on an estate (a real UK estate which is the projects) and do community service and earn his keep.

It is very concerning that we have a pedophile in the WH that everyone is intent on protecting. To the point that our government is shut down. It defies any rational logic. We have shut down governance of the biggest economy on earth to protect someone who abused CHILDREN. Sexually abused them. They had no agency or recourse. They were children.

+2. We need to clean our own house, Americans.

But we can't because the pedo-in-chief owns the FBI and Congress. But a Met Police or parliamentary investigation could shed light on how Epstein and Maxwell were conducting their trafficking operation in the UK. Oh wait, the British monarchy owns the tabloids and many MPs, so that isn't going to happen either.

[Anonymous]

I suspect (and hope) a day of reckoning will come for the BRF soon. I can’t imagine the taxpayers will continue to think they’re getting their money out of these doing buffoons who operate under a different set of rules.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I suspect (and hope) a day of reckoning will come for the BRF soon. I can’t imagine the taxpayers will continue to think they’re getting their money out of these doing buffoons who operate under a different set of rules.

Imagine being a struggling single mom or pensioner and watching William and Kate move into their fifth home, all paid for by your tax dollars. No offense to the British but it makes them look absolutely deranged.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I suspect (and hope) a day of reckoning will come for the BRF soon. I can’t imagine the taxpayers will continue to think they’re getting their money out of these doing buffoons who operate under a different set of rules.

I'd rather be in London now than Washington, dealing with a constitutional monarchy with laws.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I suspect (and hope) a day of reckoning will come for the BRF soon. I can’t imagine the taxpayers will continue to think they’re getting their money out of these doing buffoons who operate under a different set of rules.

I'd rather be in London now than Washington, dealing with a constitutional monarchy with laws.

What does a law matter when someone like Prince Andrew can get away with breaking them just because of who he was born to?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I suspect (and hope) a day of reckoning will come for the BRF soon. I can’t imagine the taxpayers will continue to think they’re getting their money out of these doing buffoons who operate under a different set of rules.

I'd rather be in London now than Washington, dealing with a constitutional monarchy with laws.

What does a law matter when someone like Prince Andrew can get away with breaking them just because of who he was born to?

At least the Brits don’t have to worry about being abducted by masked police and their own military.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I suspect (and hope) a day of reckoning will come for the BRF soon. I can’t imagine the taxpayers will continue to think they’re getting their money out of these doing buffoons who operate under a different set of rules.

Imagine being a struggling single mom or pensioner and watching William and Kate move into their fifth home, all paid for by your tax dollars. No offense to the British but it makes them look absolutely deranged.

Imagine being a struggling single mom or pensioner and watching the White House be redecorated with gold and tax cuts for the wealthy and no taxes paid by billionaire companies and SNAP benefits cut. It looks absolutely deranged.