Are Charles and William doing enough about Andrew's pedo revelations?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I think they’ve responded well. Practically speaking, he’s been living in exile on Windsor grounds where they can keep an eye on him, control who comes and goes, and essentially mitigate/eliminate future risk. Smart move imho.

They are now relegating him to smaller digs but keeping him under their watchful eye on Windsor grounds.

I doubt you will see him or Fergie anywhere public

Good point.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I think they’ve responded well. Practically speaking, he’s been living in exile on Windsor grounds where they can keep an eye on him, control who comes and goes, and essentially mitigate/eliminate future risk. Smart move imho.

They are now relegating him to smaller digs but keeping him under their watchful eye on Windsor grounds.

I doubt you will see him or Fergie anywhere public

I can see how they’d want to ensure that no minors enter the property, etc. The whole business makes me feel ill. I hope we never lay eyes on him again. Not even Charles’s funeral.

[Anonymous]

How tone deaf to ask if they’re doing enough when our president…

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I think they’ve responded well. Practically speaking, he’s been living in exile on Windsor grounds where they can keep an eye on him, control who comes and goes, and essentially mitigate/eliminate future risk. Smart move imho.

They are now relegating him to smaller digs but keeping him under their watchful eye on Windsor grounds.

I doubt you will see him or Fergie anywhere public

I can see how they’d want to ensure that no minors enter the property, etc. The whole business makes me feel ill. I hope we never lay eyes on him again. Not even Charles’s funeral.

Once Charles is gone William will have Andrew and Fergie put out with yesterday’s trash.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I care not one whit about what Charles and William are doing about Andrew. Much more concerning is what we are doing (or not doing) about Trump.

OP here. You can care about both. The FBI wanted to interview Andrew about his ties to Ghislaine and Epstein, and Andrew may be able to name other names of people he saw on the island.

Why doesn’t the FBI start by interviewing Trump?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I care not one whit about what Charles and William are doing about Andrew. Much more concerning is what we are doing (or not doing) about Trump.

OP here. You can care about both. The FBI wanted to interview Andrew about his ties to Ghislaine and Epstein, and Andrew may be able to name other names of people he saw on the island.

Why doesn’t the FBI start by interviewing Trump?

Because the FBI is now a political entity.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I think Andrew has so much dirt on all of them, that William and Charles have no choice but to tread lightly. But to answer your question, no. The guy is a pedo and lives a life of luxury with zero judicial consequence.

This. Andrew could get eight figures for a tell all. They cannot let that happen.

[Anonymous]

Used to put inconvenient relatives in the Tower.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I care not one whit about what Charles and William are doing about Andrew. Much more concerning is what we are doing (or not doing) about Trump.

OP here. You can care about both. The FBI wanted to interview Andrew about his ties to Ghislaine and Epstein, and Andrew may be able to name other names of people he saw on the island.

OK, these people have no real power anyway so who cares? Everyone hates Andrew. Whatever.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I am genuinely baffled why a modern country like the UK continues to shovel millions of pounds to these relics and inbred degenerates.

100%

[Anonymous]

I know it’s the new trendy word, but pedophiles like pre puberty children, not 17 year olds.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I know it’s the new trendy word, but pedophiles like pre puberty children, not 17 year olds.

Fine. They're ephebophiles.

It's not a trendy word.

[Anonymous]

Dirty secret is the British monarchy wants to stay powerful. They do that by kissing the rings of the wealthy, not the public. Abusing children isn’t wrong in their eyes. Humanity is just something to be abused in pursuit of power and status. You will never convince them that a grown woman with a brain is better than a child to abuse.

[Anonymous]

Grown woman or man* gender is often pretty meaningless in the dynamics.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I am genuinely baffled why a modern country like the UK continues to shovel millions of pounds to these relics and inbred degenerates.

Yes, why can’t they be more like Hunter & Joe?