Forum Index
»
Entertainment and Pop Culture
Are Charles and William doing enough about Andrew's pedo revelations?
![[Post New]](/jforum/templates/default/images/icon_minipost_new.gif){kind=icon}
Anonymous
|
Andrew's pedo past has really come back to haunt him this week. Virginia Giuffre, one of the trafficked, underage women he allegedly (guess I have to say that to protect Jeff) raped, and who committed suicide last spring, wrote a book that just came out. A long-time reporter, Lownie, has another really unflattering book about Andrew just out. There's the brand new revelation that Andrew texted Epstein right after the picture of himself and Virginia was published, saying, "I guess we're in this together, but we'll play again soon." Fergie, too, is in the muck because her email to Epstein saying, "I'm sorry I had to renounce you publicly, but we're still BFFs [because you paid off my debts]" was just released.
Is Charles doing enough by getting Andrew to agree not to use his titles? Note that Charles didn't actually strip Andrew's titles, because only parliament can do that. Now Charles is reportedly in negotiations to kick Andrew out of Royal Lodge, the former Queen Mother's home at Windsor that Andrew took over, and give him a smaller Crown Estate place. Or maybe a place on Charles' private property in Sandringham. And how about William? Initially William was claiming credit for pushing Charles to "strip" Andrew's titles, but now that's apparently fallen flat with the public as being too little, too late. So William is on another two-week vacation (his kids' school break), but his comms team is furiously briefing about how William is incandescent, he'll completely strip Andrew's titles when he's King, and how Andrew shouldn't get a good deal from this move from Royal Lodge. If Charles or William actually cared, wouldn't they call for a Met Police or Parliamentary investigation into Andrew and Andrew's finances? Or are they hiding something, too? Instead, several tabloids have articles about how the palaces think a parliamentary investigation is unecessary and would "distract" parliament from other things. Note also that William & Kate have been angling for Andrew's current home, Royal Lodge, since they first moved from Kensington Palace. Incoming: DCUM's royal bootlicker(s?) will say this topic is obsessive and who cares. Suck it up, buttercup, and go get your pictures of Kate's latest blond wig on the many royal sites. The thread is for the rest of you, who actually have consciences. |
Anonymous
| There are 2000 years of Britain's monarchs and their families doing sordid things. This is a new thing. |
Anonymous
|
I'm more concerned with our own future monarchy and the files.
Stay focused bootlicker. |
Anonymous
| What more do you want them to do? Elizabeth created a monster by coddling her favorite son. |
Anonymous
| I think Andrew has so much dirt on all of them, that William and Charles have no choice but to tread lightly. But to answer your question, no. The guy is a pedo and lives a life of luxury with zero judicial consequence. |
Anonymous
| I am genuinely baffled why a modern country like the UK continues to shovel millions of pounds to these relics and inbred degenerates. |
Anonymous
+1 |
Anonymous
| I care not one whit about what Charles and William are doing about Andrew. Much more concerning is what we are doing (or not doing) about Trump. |
Anonymous
| They own vast lands. Feudal system ya know? Even without a taxpayer dime they would have fortunes. |
Anonymous
OP here. I'd say I'm the opposite of a bootlicker. Charles and William may be the downfall of the monarchy. I suppose that if they're the best the monarchy is producing these days, then so be it. But I do care about pedos being coddled, and you should, too. Agree 100% that the orange dumpster fire needs to release the Epstein files. |
Anonymous
OP here. You can care about both. The FBI wanted to interview Andrew about his ties to Ghislaine and Epstein, and Andrew may be able to name other names of people he saw on the island. |
Anonymous
OP here. What??? MAGA and Trump love the British royal family. I agree Trump is a pedo and a criminal, and I want to see ALL the Epstein files released. It's just that some of us can keep more than one thought in our head at the same time. |
Anonymous
+1 Does it really matter? So he'll go from one paid-for estate with staff, meals, drivers to a smaller estate with staff, meals, drivers? Boo hoo. They should make him live on an estate (a real UK estate which is the projects) and do community service and earn his keep. It is very concerning that we have a pedophile in the WH that everyone is intent on protecting. To the point that our government is shut down. It defies any rational logic. We have shut down governance of the biggest economy on earth to protect someone who abused CHILDREN. Sexually abused them. They had no agency or recourse. They were children. |
Anonymous
This. Andrew could write his own Spare, and that's got both Charles and William quaking in their slippers. |
Anonymous
|
I think they’ve responded well. Practically speaking, he’s been living in exile on Windsor grounds where they can keep an eye on him, control who comes and goes, and essentially mitigate/eliminate future risk. Smart move imho.
They are now relegating him to smaller digs but keeping him under their watchful eye on Windsor grounds. I doubt you will see him or Fergie anywhere public |