has anyone been to games at Liberty Sports park in Maryland?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Is it privately owned? Its not owned by the county?

Its weird that a posted jumped in ASAP to keep defending a random field. Who cares that much?

How is the complex named in the headline of this thread and also random?

Just think its odd that someone is so angry that anyone is critiquing the field.

One opinion is fine, the opposing is angry lol

btw it's a sports complex of many fields

[Anonymous]

If you play on the end field, your ball will consistently roll down the hill to the parking lot because it's not fenced behind the goal and there's a steep hill right behind. Super annoying.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The only games we’ve played there are state cup. It’s a long drive but we typically make long drives for soccer. We didn’t like the lack of restroom facilities but to be fair, this is a complaint at many fields. I don’t understand how bathrooms are not a consideration when these places are built. I’m tired of having to leave fields mid-game and drive to a business with a bathroom. And what about the players? But I digress. I think the park is no better nor worse than many places. It’s not a place I’d choose but it gave us an excuse to visit Annapolis.

ITA, especially for teenage girls dealing with tampons etc. Ridiculous and gross not to have bathrooms and sinks for hand washing.

Like Muldoon Farms nice bathrooms

Yes, this field is a terrible experience, just like Muldoon. Agree!

Let's start by comparing the parking at both

Then let's compare the quality of fields at both

The use of portojohns which is common at many sporting events makes the whole facility terrible?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Is it privately owned? Its not owned by the county?

Its weird that a posted jumped in ASAP to keep defending a random field. Who cares that much?

How is the complex named in the headline of this thread and also random?

Just think its odd that someone is so angry that anyone is critiquing the field.

One opinion is fine, the opposing is angry lol

btw it's a sports complex of many fields

Sounds like a really crappy complex. Glad we haven't had to go there.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:If you play on the end field, your ball will consistently roll down the hill to the parking lot because it's not fenced behind the goal and there's a steep hill right behind. Super annoying.

Yeah, balls going into bushes and trees at Soccerplex should have that place shut down

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The only games we’ve played there are state cup. It’s a long drive but we typically make long drives for soccer. We didn’t like the lack of restroom facilities but to be fair, this is a complaint at many fields. I don’t understand how bathrooms are not a consideration when these places are built. I’m tired of having to leave fields mid-game and drive to a business with a bathroom. And what about the players? But I digress. I think the park is no better nor worse than many places. It’s not a place I’d choose but it gave us an excuse to visit Annapolis.

ITA, especially for teenage girls dealing with tampons etc. Ridiculous and gross not to have bathrooms and sinks for hand washing.

Like Muldoon Farms nice bathrooms

Yes, this field is a terrible experience, just like Muldoon. Agree!

Let's start by comparing the parking at both

Then let's compare the quality of fields at both

The use of portojohns which is common at many sporting events makes the whole facility terrible?

OK, so I think we've established that this person definitely is involved with the ownership of this crappy field complex! No one else would care that much.

Yes, use of portapotties is a HUGE negative. How is this difficult to grasp?

[Anonymous]

Who owns it?

[Anonymous]

We were tentatively going to play in the Alexandria Harvest Cup and our coach pulled our team out because he hates dealing with this field location so much. I don't understand why a tournament run by Alexandria would be using fields in PG County anyway.

[Anonymous]

We've been there (once was enough). The design did not make any logical sense TBH. I would never have laid out the fields like that, with the "spectator fences" and of course there should be bathrooms and running water for hand washing.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The only games we’ve played there are state cup. It’s a long drive but we typically make long drives for soccer. We didn’t like the lack of restroom facilities but to be fair, this is a complaint at many fields. I don’t understand how bathrooms are not a consideration when these places are built. I’m tired of having to leave fields mid-game and drive to a business with a bathroom. And what about the players? But I digress. I think the park is no better nor worse than many places. It’s not a place I’d choose but it gave us an excuse to visit Annapolis.

ITA, especially for teenage girls dealing with tampons etc. Ridiculous and gross not to have bathrooms and sinks for hand washing.

Like Muldoon Farms nice bathrooms

Yes, this field is a terrible experience, just like Muldoon. Agree!

Let's start by comparing the parking at both

Then let's compare the quality of fields at both

The use of portojohns which is common at many sporting events makes the whole facility terrible?

OK, so I think we've established that this person definitely is involved with the ownership of this crappy field complex! No one else would care that much.

Yes, use of portapotties is a HUGE negative. How is this difficult to grasp?

It's a negative, even with some portables being much better than others.

So are solid bathrooms negative at tournaments and games not maintained and are a disaster by noon on Day 1

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The only games we’ve played there are state cup. It’s a long drive but we typically make long drives for soccer. We didn’t like the lack of restroom facilities but to be fair, this is a complaint at many fields. I don’t understand how bathrooms are not a consideration when these places are built. I’m tired of having to leave fields mid-game and drive to a business with a bathroom. And what about the players? But I digress. I think the park is no better nor worse than many places. It’s not a place I’d choose but it gave us an excuse to visit Annapolis.

ITA, especially for teenage girls dealing with tampons etc. Ridiculous and gross not to have bathrooms and sinks for hand washing.

Like Muldoon Farms nice bathrooms

Yes, this field is a terrible experience, just like Muldoon. Agree!

Let's start by comparing the parking at both

Then let's compare the quality of fields at both

The use of portojohns which is common at many sporting events makes the whole facility terrible?

OK, so I think we've established that this person definitely is involved with the ownership of this crappy field complex! No one else would care that much.

Yes, use of portapotties is a HUGE negative. How is this difficult to grasp?

It's a negative, even with some portables being much better than others.

So are solid bathrooms negative at tournaments and games not maintained and are a disaster by noon on Day 1

\
Oh goodness, with the $$$. pouring in from the tournament fees, a custodian could be on site to keep things tidy.

[Anonymous]

I think what happened was, they were trying to cram as many fields as they could into X size piece of land, and "extra" space for things like somewhere for parents to sit, or bathrooms, or enough parking space all would decrease revenue if it caused there to be less field space.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The only games we’ve played there are state cup. It’s a long drive but we typically make long drives for soccer. We didn’t like the lack of restroom facilities but to be fair, this is a complaint at many fields. I don’t understand how bathrooms are not a consideration when these places are built. I’m tired of having to leave fields mid-game and drive to a business with a bathroom. And what about the players? But I digress. I think the park is no better nor worse than many places. It’s not a place I’d choose but it gave us an excuse to visit Annapolis.

ITA, especially for teenage girls dealing with tampons etc. Ridiculous and gross not to have bathrooms and sinks for hand washing.

Like Muldoon Farms nice bathrooms

Yes, this field is a terrible experience, just like Muldoon. Agree!

Let's start by comparing the parking at both

Then let's compare the quality of fields at both

The use of portojohns which is common at many sporting events makes the whole facility terrible?

OK, so I think we've established that this person definitely is involved with the ownership of this crappy field complex! No one else would care that much.

Yes, use of portapotties is a HUGE negative. How is this difficult to grasp?

It's a negative, even with some portables being much better than others.

So are solid bathrooms negative at tournaments and games not maintained and are a disaster by noon on Day 1

\
Oh goodness, with the $$$. pouring in from the tournament fees, a custodian could be on site to keep things tidy.

Have you seen some of those fancy porta potties at weddings? There are good options, but of course everyone cheaps out. Agree with how much $$$$ is spent the level of service should match

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If you play on the end field, your ball will consistently roll down the hill to the parking lot because it's not fenced behind the goal and there's a steep hill right behind. Super annoying.

Yeah, balls going into bushes and trees at Soccerplex should have that place shut down

It's insane!

[Anonymous]

I don't understand how these places with multiple fields are given permission to build so few parking spaces. No one is taking public transportation to a soccer field in the middle of nowhere. Cllearly, multiple fields in use mean a certain number of cars. The parking there is awful!