Cambridge University student on “elite” educations of members of Congress

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:No Georgetown, no Northeastern, No NYU, No Tulane, No Vandy, No Kenyon, No Denison, No Emory, none of the second tiers that the DMV private school parents have convinced themselves are now “elite”

This is a huge country with hundreds of amazing universities. The search for elite is weak minded.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Adam Schiff & Cory Booker have great educational credentials, & you couldn’t find two bigger imbeciles.

I've worked with Corey Booker and he's brilliant. What are your credentials and what do your co-workers say about you?

5 degrees (including doctorate) & they think I’m brilliant.

Tell your buddy Cory that I still think he’s a moron.

You may not agree with Cory Booker (I often do not) but he is not a moron by any means. If you believe that he is then you are likely the moron.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:No Georgetown, no Northeastern, No NYU, No Tulane, No Vandy, No Kenyon, No Denison, No Emory, none of the second tiers that the DMV private school parents have convinced themselves are now “elite”

This is a huge country with hundreds of amazing universities. The search for elite is weak minded.

Uh huh

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Remove these:
Bowdoin
Carleton
Colgate
Davidson
Haverford
Smith
Washington and Lee
Wesleyan ( may be)

Nah, they are all excellent schools which deserve to be on any list of elite schools.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Georgetown, UVA, and Vanderbilt are still excellent undergraduate schools and arguably would have had their undergraduate schools included if the methodology was slightly altered.

Essentially, the author decided to focus on the frequency of occurrences in USNWR top 20 instead of 25 over some number of years. While Vanderbilt has ranked well into the top 20 for most of the past decade, it was ranked between 20-25 in the 1990s. Georgetown has consistently ranked in the top 20-25, and UVA has hovered around 25.

I don’t think this means much, especially when you consider the LACs included, which if slotted in among national universities in USNWR national university rankings might rank lower than Georgetown, Vanderbilt, and UVA.

When considering undergraduate education the SLACs on this list are the equal of ANY institution on the list. That is not to say that Georgetown and Vandy aren't excellent schools; they are but they have nothing on any of the SLACs on that list for a classical liberal arts education.

UVA is also an excellent school but no Public school belongs in any serious discussion of the best schools for undergraduate education. It isn't their mission and if they were focused on it they would have to drastically reduce the pool of students eligible to attend from within their state borders.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:This is actually pretty striking:

Well now we see why they hate liberal elites!

[Anonymous]

Denison and Kenyon are elite.

Grinnell isn’t elite. Just woke.

[Anonymous]

Great list.

[Anonymous]

Your mom is elite.

[Anonymous]

Vassar is elite but Emory isnt?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Georgetown, UVA, and Vanderbilt are still excellent undergraduate schools and arguably would have had their undergraduate schools included if the methodology was slightly altered.

Essentially, the author decided to focus on the frequency of occurrences in USNWR top 20 instead of 25 over some number of years. While Vanderbilt has ranked well into the top 20 for most of the past decade, it was ranked between 20-25 in the 1990s. Georgetown has consistently ranked in the top 20-25, and UVA has hovered around 25.

I don’t think this means much, especially when you consider the LACs included, which if slotted in among national universities in USNWR national university rankings might rank lower than Georgetown, Vanderbilt, and UVA.

When considering undergraduate education the SLACs on this list are the equal of ANY institution on the list. That is not to say that Georgetown and Vandy aren't excellent schools; they are but they have nothing on any of the SLACs on that list for a classical liberal arts education.

UVA is also an excellent school but no Public school belongs in any serious discussion of the best schools for undergraduate education. It isn't their mission and if they were focused on it they would have to drastically reduce the pool of students eligible to attend from within their state borders.

There liberal arts mission doesn't make them elite in any way. The only LACs that compare to Vandy, Georgetown, Emory are WASP.

[Anonymous]

Very interesting study, OP, thanks for posting.

[Anonymous]

Why did person making list pick obviously crazy lefty schools (Vassar, Grinnell, wesleyean) and leave out far more well regarded schools

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Georgetown, UVA, and Vanderbilt are still excellent undergraduate schools and arguably would have had their undergraduate schools included if the methodology was slightly altered.

Essentially, the author decided to focus on the frequency of occurrences in USNWR top 20 instead of 25 over some number of years. While Vanderbilt has ranked well into the top 20 for most of the past decade, it was ranked between 20-25 in the 1990s. Georgetown has consistently ranked in the top 20-25, and UVA has hovered around 25.

I don’t think this means much, especially when you consider the LACs included, which if slotted in among national universities in USNWR national university rankings might rank lower than Georgetown, Vanderbilt, and UVA.

When considering undergraduate education the SLACs on this list are the equal of ANY institution on the list. That is not to say that Georgetown and Vandy aren't excellent schools; they are but they have nothing on any of the SLACs on that list for a classical liberal arts education.

UVA is also an excellent school but no Public school belongs in any serious discussion of the best schools for undergraduate education. It isn't their mission and if they were focused on it they would have to drastically reduce the pool of students eligible to attend from within their state borders.

There liberal arts mission doesn't make them elite in any way. The only LACs that compare to Vandy, Georgetown, Emory are WASP.

You are delusional if you believe that WASP is somehow better than the other 6 SLACs with basically identical stats. And, you are even more delusional if you think that Vandy, Georgetown, and especially Emory are the equal of any of the top dozen SALCs.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Why did person making list pick obviously crazy lefty schools (Vassar, Grinnell, wesleyean) and leave out far more well regarded schools

They didn't