Forum Index
»
Political Discussion
Has Jamie Diamond caused anyone here to do a little self reflecting besides myself ?
![[Post New]](/jforum/templates/default/images/icon_minipost_new.gif){kind=icon}
Anonymous
Plz cite a few of those studies. |
Anonymous
LMAO  Poor OP! Hope your son is not as incompetent as you.
|
Anonymous
People are bored. They want excitement. |
Anonymous
DP. Why are people so incurious? So unwilling to check claims themselves? This took me 20 seconds to find. You might google now because there are now AI summaries. Here you go, from McKinsey: “The business case for gender diversity on executive teams1 has more than doubled over the past decade. Each of our reports—2015, 2018, 2020, and now 2023—has found a steady upward trend, tracking ever greater representation of women on executive teams. At each time point we have assessed the data, the likelihood of financial outperformance gap has grown: Our 2015 report found top-quartile companies had a 15 percent greater likelihood of financial outperformance versus their bottom-quartile peers; this year, that figure hits 39 percent (Exhibit 1).” “A strong business case for ethnic diversity is also consistent over time, with a 39 percent increased likelihood of outperformance for those in the top quartile of ethnic representation versus the bottom quartile. This has persisted even with eight new economies added in our analysis of 2022 financial data.2” “The penalties3 for low diversity on executive teams are also intensifying. Companies with representation of women exceeding 30 percent (and thus in the top quartile) are significantly more likely to financially outperform those with 30 percent or fewer. Similarly, companies in our top quartile for ethnic diversity show an average 27 percent financial advantage over others (Exhibit 2).” https://www.mckinsey.com/featured-insights/diversity-and-inclusion/diversity-matters-even-more-the-case-for-holistic-impact |
Anonymous
| I think OP is a troll. But that’s just my opinion. |
Anonymous
Hi op. The problem is today’s Democratic Party is no longer the Democratic Party of 10 or 20 years ago. Today’s Democrats are The Left. There are few to no reasonable people left in the Democratic Party. |
Anonymous
Why do you believe I was incurious? I figured the McKinsey study would be the one cited. The a McKinsey study has been called into doubt by multiple serious researchers. Why are you so incurious as to have simply accepted the first flawed “study” that confirmed your biases? https://www.wsj.com/finance/investing/diversity-was-supposed-to-make-us-rich-not-so-much-39da6a23 |
Anonymous
|
OP. I can't take you seriously if you misspell Dimon's name like this. Reading the rest of your drivel... You sound so extraordinarily dumb. You have no reasoning capabilities whatsoever. I don't care what political beliefs you ascribe to, you cannot think your way out of a paper bag. Dimon, on the other hand, is no fool. But you're so stupid you can't even understand what he means; and you missed that he's operating under Rich Person Rules, which are not the rules of anyone else. |
Anonymous
Okay, so you don’t like women or POC in the workforce, gotcha. This took 2 min. 😘 “The latest pushback has centered on the Human Rights Campaign (HRC) and its index that many Fortune 500 companies participate in. In response to recent departures from the HRC index, they find that 72% of LGBTQ+ adults say they would feel less accepted at companies that roll back DEI. Given that 7.6% of U.S. adults identify as LGBTQ+, and the community also has $1.4 trillion in buying power, this is worrisome for companies that have divested in DEI. It is estimated that the cost of exclusion is over $1 trillion on the economy.” https://www.forbes.com/sites/juliekratz/2024/11/06/why-abandoning-diversity-efforts-will-hurt-your-bottom-line/ “Another study published in American Sociological Review found many correlations between workplace diversity and better business results. Companies with greater racial diversity had better sales revenue, more customers, bigger market shares and higher profits than less diverse organizations. Higher levels of gender diversity were also tied to outperforming in revenue, customer and profit categories.2 ” https://www.employerscouncil.org/resources/diversity-benefits-your-businesss/ “Incorporating DEI policies into the hiring process can significantly improve retention. According to the American Marketing Association (AMA), DEI retention challenges can arise from day one if onboarding policies do not address potential microaggressions and other harmful behaviors targeted at employees based on their race, ethnicity, gender, age, etc.” https://peoplethriver.com/how-does-dei-benefit-the-workplace/ |
Anonymous
You’re not alone. It seems pretty obvious. |
Anonymous
| Nobody can possibly take OP seriously if she thinks his last name is Diamond. lol |
Anonymous
|
Why would I self reflect based on Jamie Dimon? I mean, self-reflection is great… but I am not motivated by it because of that dude.
https://fortune.com/2025/07/11/jamie-dimon-democratic-party-idiots-dei-social-issues/ I’ve usually registered Dem my whole life. I’m certainly not Republican. For many years when I lived in CA I was just independent. I’m a millennial minority woman. That being said, I’ve lived in a few different cities and states (urban, suburban, rural), in super blue areas as well as reddish areas. The elite Dems are out of touch. They have had a stronghold on power for a long time at the expense of new blood, fresh voices, new ideas. I currently live in an area where the people are getting displaced by rich tech folks and no one can afford to buy a house. I work in a blue collar industry with pro-environment goals and there is a huge divide between the rich and poor’s perspectives. I’ve had more of a varied and colorful life than many of my friends from the DC suburbs, and so have a different perspective. A lot of liberals live in their bubbles. (So do conservatives, of course, but they’re winning at the moment.) When it comes down to it, people want to be able to have a basic job and afford the basics - home, car, food. They do not care about pronouns. They may even be gay or have gay family, yet do not care about that sort of thing in terms of voting for a president. They may care about the environment but still just want to be able to afford gas to get to where they’re going, it’s not a status item or virtue signal because their friends don’t have them either. The people protesting Israel on the side of the road are often people who don’t even know their neighbors here in the U.S. or would look twice at someone in a scruffy work boots. If you speak out about how you don’t have anything against gays/EVs/Gaza but you still want to just have the basics and you say it without the right phrasing, you get called ignorant or a fascist. Most people are pretty neutral about Big Ideas. They don’t trust either party. They just want the basics. |
Anonymous
Yeah, the "democrat" moniker is a dead giveaway |
Anonymous
https://mbs.edu/news/why-diverse-teams-are-more-profitable https://www.mckinsey.com/featured-insights/diversity-and-inclusion/diversity-matters-even-more-the-case-for-holistic-impact https://online.uncp.edu/degrees/business/mba/general/diversity-and-inclusion-good-for-business/ |
Anonymous
You are not the manager of the department and have no idea what other qualities or experience the other employee has. But...if your son is anything like you, I can understand why he was passed over. |