Just in time for Pride Month…

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:It was a really weird choice to name a ship after him. He is notable as a San Francisco politician and LGBT figure, not as as a military figure despite his service.

And the right called the left snowflakes.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I feel as if marshal fships ought to be named after heroes, meaning men or women who have proven themselves worthy through heroic acts.

Harvey Milk was a victim; not a hero.

He was a hero to fight for his rights. That is what the USA is all about, no?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It was a really weird choice to name a ship after him. He is notable as a San Francisco politician and LGBT figure, not as as a military figure despite his service.

And the right called the left snowflakes.

The PP’s point is true. Why the push to name military ships after civil rights leaders rather than military heroes? Glad Trump is making this change.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I’ll be glad when the next administration changes the name back. This bullshit is only temporary.

It had a different name for 100 years prior to being named Milk. I think the Milk name will be temporary.

And who cares? Not every single thing needs to be made into an LGBT celebration. It's okay for the military to commemorate notable military people. It's better, in fact, so that new service members can find good role models and learn their history.

What? No. No one changes the name of a ship once it has been Christined. There is no naval salior in any navy in the world who would go into combat on a renamed ship. tell me you know NOTHING about the US Navy without using the words.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:And the point is, why change the name?

To pwn the libs. It’s their primary goal.

Hundred bucks says they rename the USS John S. McCain as well.

Well kegbreth is in talks of renaming the Harriet Tubman as well. And yes she was a decorated war hero.

Tubman at least makes sense as a notable military figure.

Ships are named to honor prominent Americans whether or not they were in the military. Connie Morella was not a librarian but they still named a library after her.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I’ll be glad when the next administration changes the name back. This bullshit is only temporary.

It had a different name for 100 years prior to being named Milk. I think the Milk name will be temporary.

And who cares? Not every single thing needs to be made into an LGBT celebration. It's okay for the military to commemorate notable military people. It's better, in fact, so that new service members can find good role models and learn their history.

What? No. No one changes the name of a ship once it has been Christined. There is no naval salior in any navy in the world who would go into combat on a renamed ship. tell me you know NOTHING about the US Navy without using the words.

Um, Trump is changing the name now.

[Anonymous]

Is there a naval ship named Trump?!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:And the point is, why change the name?

It shouldn’t have even named after Milk in the first place, that’s why. He was in a relationship with a 16 year old boy! Nope.

But Trump's relationships with 14 year old girls is perfectly acceptable. Got it.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I’ll be glad when the next administration changes the name back. This bullshit is only temporary.

It had a different name for 100 years prior to being named Milk. I think the Milk name will be temporary.

Wrong.

“Congress began funding the construction of those ships in late 2015, and the first of them was launched in 2021.”

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:And the point is, why change the name?

It shouldn’t have even named after Milk in the first place, that’s why. He was in a relationship with a 16 year old boy! Nope.

But Trump's relationships with 14 year old girls is perfectly acceptable. Got it.

No one believes that. Sorry. Milk’s relationship is confirmed.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It was a really weird choice to name a ship after him. He is notable as a San Francisco politician and LGBT figure, not as as a military figure despite his service.

And the right called the left snowflakes.

The PP’s point is true. Why the push to name military ships after civil rights leaders rather than military heroes? Glad Trump is making this change.

Do you understand the bad juju naval personnel have with renaming ships? You may as well sell it to some other country to use.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It was a really weird choice to name a ship after him. He is notable as a San Francisco politician and LGBT figure, not as as a military figure despite his service.

And the right called the left snowflakes.

+1 Hegseth’s “warfighters” need a safe space where they don’t have to acknowledge the existence of Black, Latino, or gay people.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It was a really weird choice to name a ship after him. He is notable as a San Francisco politician and LGBT figure, not as as a military figure despite his service.

And the right called the left snowflakes.

+1 Hegseth’s “warfighters” need a safe space where they don’t have to acknowledge the existence of Black, Latino, or gay people.

A military warship isn’t the space. It should be for acknowledging the military, a leader, valor, special bravery.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It was a really weird choice to name a ship after him. He is notable as a San Francisco politician and LGBT figure, not as as a military figure despite his service.

And the right called the left snowflakes.

The PP’s point is true. Why the push to name military ships after civil rights leaders rather than military heroes? Glad Trump is making this change.

Do you understand the bad juju naval personnel have with renaming ships? You may as well sell it to some other country to use.

A PP just said it hasn’t been done before.

Superstition is silly medieval nonsense.

[Anonymous]

Never would have been a problem with Boaty McBoatface.