Where does prestige stop?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Most prestigious:
Harvard, Stanford, MIT, Caltech, Penn, Princeton

Less prestigious:
Yale, Columbia, Hopkins, Chicago, Northwestern

Afterwards:
No prestige

Penn does not belong in that top group. Not even Wharton. Yale has far more prestige.

30 years ago you would have been correct. Now Penn is in the top group.

Penn is on the rise with over 72,000 apps this year. Yale apps went down.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:A lot also depends on the age of the person. Older people aren't impressed by state schools, unless it is UVA, Berkley or Michigan. People in their 50's probably add Texas, UCLA and UNC to the list.

Regionally, a lot of state schools have a lot of prestige.

DP

Show us on the doll where UCLA hurt you.

The top ranked public for basically the last decade, with the most applications in the U.S. and the lowest acceptance rate of all publics, is only considered on Virginia’s or Michigan’s level by those in their 50s? Feel free to also peep the cross admit data and the comprehensive student rankings when you’re ready to return to reality.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:A lot also depends on the age of the person. Older people aren't impressed by state schools, unless it is UVA, Berkley or Michigan. People in their 50's probably add Texas, UCLA and UNC to the list.

Regionally, a lot of state schools have a lot of prestige.

DP

Show us on the doll where UCLA hurt you.

The top ranked public for basically the last decade, with the most applications in the U.S. and the lowest acceptance rate of all publics, is only considered on Virginia’s or Michigan’s level by those in their 50s? Feel free to also peep the cross admit data and the comprehensive student rankings when you’re ready to return to reality.

My kid is going to UCLA and people seem to be pretty impressed.

[Anonymous]

Generally Top 30 - 40
But Rutgers and UGA are NOT prestigious
BC sort of is
BU is not
Tulane is not
UMiami is not
GW is not

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Generally Top 30 - 40
But Rutgers and UGA are NOT prestigious
BC sort of is
BU is not
Tulane is not
UMiami is not
GW is not

LOL all of the 2nd tier UC schools are not for a starter.

[Anonymous]

The moment your precious Larlo graduates and starts working for someone who expects performance.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:A lot also depends on the age of the person. Older people aren't impressed by state schools, unless it is UVA, Berkley or Michigan. People in their 50's probably add Texas, UCLA and UNC to the list.

Regionally, a lot of state schools have a lot of prestige.

Before you comment on a school's prestige, you might want to learn how to spell Berkeley.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:DMV - T20 (or UVA ) or bust

Right outside DMV - T50 or bust

Everywhere else (other than Boston or wealthy Cali areas) - any school your kid got into that is happy at = bumper sticker for that school on the car

Georgetown is also outside T20, but deemed prestigious by many if not most.

Particularly SFS which i the #1 school of its kind in the world.

[Anonymous]

it stops right before Cornell

[Anonymous]

so silly. it stops right after the lowest ranked school my kids attend.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:At Tulane? At American? GWU?

None of those are prestigious

Prestige is ivy+ (ivies plus mit stanford duke chicago)
Or maybe expand to the top20 privates plus WAS lacs. Some would add the top 5 publics but only UCB is truly prestigious.

Somewhat true. But these days top students want to go to UCLA more than Berkeley and Pomona more than WAS.

They want to go USC.

If they can’t get into UCLA

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:A lot also depends on the age of the person. Older people aren't impressed by state schools, unless it is UVA, Berkley or Michigan. People in their 50's probably add Texas, UCLA and UNC to the list.

Regionally, a lot of state schools have a lot of prestige.

DP

Show us on the doll where UCLA hurt you.

The top ranked public for basically the last decade, with the most applications in the U.S. and the lowest acceptance rate of all publics, is only considered on Virginia’s or Michigan’s level by those in their 50s? Feel free to also peep the cross admit data and the comprehensive student rankings when you’re ready to return to reality.

UCLA was pretty easy to get into in the 1980s and 1990s. It was a good school but not prestigious. Berkeley was much better academically.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:it stops right before Cornell

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:At Tulane? At American? GWU?

None of those are prestigious

Prestige is ivy+ (ivies plus mit stanford duke chicago)
Or maybe expand to the top20 privates plus WAS lacs. Some would add the top 5 publics but only UCB is truly prestigious.

Somewhat true. But these days top students want to go to UCLA more than Berkeley and Pomona more than WAS.

They want to go USC.

True

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:At Tulane? At American? GWU?

None of those are prestigious

Prestige is ivy+ (ivies plus mit stanford duke chicago)
Or maybe expand to the top20 privates plus WAS lacs. Some would add the top 5 publics but only UCB is truly prestigious.

Somewhat true. But these days top students want to go to UCLA more than Berkeley and Pomona more than WAS.

They want to go USC.

USC - way more than DCUM would have you believe