MSM not reporting Pakistan and India on the brink of war.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:President Clinton places the blame squarely on Hindu militants, not
on the so-called Kashmiri Muslims that the Indian government tried to
blame for the massacre. In 2002, the Washington Times reported that the
government finally admitted its responsibility and admitted that the
evidence that it used to pin the blame on Kashmiris was false.
Reporter Barry Bearak of the New York Times also placed the blame
squarely on the Indian government, as did two independent
investigations, one by the International Human Rights Organization,
which is based in Ludhiana, and the other conducted jointly by the
Punjab Human Rights Organization and the Movement Against State
Repression. The evidence is overwhelming, yet Indian sycophants
continue to deny the government's responsibility.
Unfortunately, this massacre would have been swept under the rug if
not for the outstanding efforts of the organizations mentioned above
and of the Council of Khalistan, which has painstakingly documented any
new developments. I am indebted to them for bringing this to my
attention.
The massacre was part of a pattern of repression of minorities that
has brought about the murders of over 250,000 Sikhs, more than 300,000
Christians in Nagaland alone, over 90,000 Muslims in Kashmir alone, and
Christians and Muslims throughout the country, as well as tens of
thousands of Assamese, Bodos, Dalits, Manipuris, Tamils, and other
minorities. This is one reason that it is essential to cut off our aid
and trade to India and to demand a free and fair plebiscite in Punjab,
Khalistan, in Kashmir, in Nagalim, and wherever people are seeking
their freedom. This is the only way to bring freedom, peace, stability,
and dignity to all the people of south Asia.
I would like to introduce the press release from the Council of
Khalistan on Secretary Albright's book into the Record at this time.

That’s from twenty years ago.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:President Clinton places the blame squarely on Hindu militants, not
on the so-called Kashmiri Muslims that the Indian government tried to
blame for the massacre. In 2002, the Washington Times reported that the
government finally admitted its responsibility and admitted that the
evidence that it used to pin the blame on Kashmiris was false.
Reporter Barry Bearak of the New York Times also placed the blame
squarely on the Indian government, as did two independent
investigations, one by the International Human Rights Organization,
which is based in Ludhiana, and the other conducted jointly by the
Punjab Human Rights Organization and the Movement Against State
Repression. The evidence is overwhelming, yet Indian sycophants
continue to deny the government's responsibility.
Unfortunately, this massacre would have been swept under the rug if
not for the outstanding efforts of the organizations mentioned above
and of the Council of Khalistan, which has painstakingly documented any
new developments. I am indebted to them for bringing this to my
attention.
The massacre was part of a pattern of repression of minorities that
has brought about the murders of over 250,000 Sikhs, more than 300,000
Christians in Nagaland alone, over 90,000 Muslims in Kashmir alone, and
Christians and Muslims throughout the country, as well as tens of
thousands of Assamese, Bodos, Dalits, Manipuris, Tamils, and other
minorities. This is one reason that it is essential to cut off our aid
and trade to India and to demand a free and fair plebiscite in Punjab,
Khalistan, in Kashmir, in Nagalim, and wherever people are seeking
their freedom. This is the only way to bring freedom, peace, stability,
and dignity to all the people of south Asia.
I would like to introduce the press release from the Council of
Khalistan on Secretary Albright's book into the Record at this time.

Makes sense why Modhi refused to investigate the attack in Kashmir

[Anonymous]

Pakistan downing Indian jets. War

[Anonymous]

I have no idea what these people are fighting about but let them sort it out on their own. The US has enough to worry about.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I have no idea what these people are fighting about but let them sort it out on their own. The US has enough to worry about.

Well we are on track to be back in the neighborhood. Israel wants us to visit Iran this time.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Nuclear war, that is.

Sure - they’ve been “on the brink” forever, but recent escalations are far more serious.

Why the news blackout? Even BBC is not covering the war.

It's the top story on Google and CNN right now, dingbat.

+1 I got two different notifications about this today, from CNN and the WSJ at about 5 pm eastern.

[Anonymous]

Trump said there would be no wars and that foreign leaders would listen to him. What happened, MAGA? Trump lied

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Am I the only one who thinks this is an appropriate response to the Kashmir attack?

How do you think this is appropriate?

This is crazy. And dangerous.

So was the Kashmir attack.

The question was not whether the Kashmir attack was ok. It was how is this appropriate?

Unless you think crazy and dangerous attacks are appropriate?

It is an officially declared attack within the non disputed borders of Pakistan by the Indian military.

Countries have a right to self-defense. If nothing was done in response, attacks on India would continue.

India has been supporting terrorist attacks in Pakistan in the west of the country, in KP and Balochistan.

[Anonymous]

This never would have happened if Biden was president. These countries all know trump is weak.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Am I the only one who thinks this is an appropriate response to the Kashmir attack?

How do you think this is appropriate?

This is crazy. And dangerous.

So was the Kashmir attack.

The question was not whether the Kashmir attack was ok. It was how is this appropriate?

Unless you think crazy and dangerous attacks are appropriate?

It is an officially declared attack within the non disputed borders of Pakistan by the Indian military.

Countries have a right to self-defense. If nothing was done in response, attacks on India would continue.

India has been supporting terrorist attacks in Pakistan in the west of the country, in KP and Balochistan.

Do tell. Which attacks have happened in KP and Balochistan ahead of the killing of the tourists, and which Indian terrorist groups are responsible for them.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I have no idea what these people are fighting about but let them sort it out on their own. The US has enough to worry about.

Well we are on track to be back in the neighborhood. Israel wants us to visit Iran this time.

And pimping that idea is what got Waltz fired. Not happening.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:This never would have happened if Biden was president. These countries all know trump is weak.

The problems between India and Pakistan pre-date either of these presidents, and will likely continue forever. The problem with having an incompetent administration is that both countries can go nuclear, and ordinarily, there is an effort to make sure that they don't blow the world up, but with this administration in place, who really knows what they'd actually even attempt to do, never mind accomplish?

[Anonymous]

Oh no, that can't be...MAGA insisted wars don't start under the felon. But, I'm sure Hegseth will be able to calm tensions.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Trump said there would be no wars and that foreign leaders would listen to him. What happened, MAGA? Trump lied

Exactly. Campaign promise broken.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Yes, I thought it was strange how little reporting the 4/22 attack on Kashmir received in the US. I really only saw it on twitter.

https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cze10y59j91o.amp

India kicked out all the Pakistanis from the country. That was a huge step, that again, got little coverage.

And I guess the fighting has escalated now? Not good.

Yes, thanks!

I followed what little world news I could find about that attack, but it was obvious (to you and I at least) the massive implications.

This could easily spiral out of control. I dearly hope it does not, but the threat here is very real.