MSM not reporting Pakistan and India on the brink of war.
![[Post New]](/jforum/templates/default/images/icon_minipost_new.gif){kind=icon}
Anonymous
The question was not whether the Kashmir attack was ok. It was how is this appropriate? Unless you think crazy and dangerous attacks are appropriate? It is an officially declared attack within the non disputed borders of Pakistan by the Indian military. |
Anonymous
Killing civilians in a mosque is also not okay. |
Anonymous
A child was killed when one of the Indian missiles struck a mosque. https://www.pbs.org/newshour/world/india-fires-missiles-across-the-frontier-with-pakistan |
Anonymous
Countries have a right to self-defense. If nothing was done in response, attacks on India would continue. |
Anonymous
FAFO |
Anonymous
Exactly. I admire India for not rolling over. |
Anonymous
|
In this thread OP may learn that main stream media is driven by clicks. Until today, there were not enough clicks to be given in response to a story on tensions between these two.
Or OP won’t learn and is still an idiot. |
Anonymous
| We have seen this movie multiple times, the moment things get to normal in Kashmir, something similar happens. Every time it’s Pakistan playing similar games. This time they got what they have been begging for a long time. |
Anonymous
Are people surprised Modi is a nationalist? |
Anonymous
Movie is right. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/2008_Mumbai_attacks |
Anonymous
How can people click on the story when the media hadn't even meaningfully been running the story to begin with? |
Anonymous
Agreed. Pakistan is a haven for terrorists (Bin Laden was found in Pakistan).! |
Anonymous
|
India’s intelligence services planned this. They planned a similar attack during Clinton’s visit. Gives them a pretext for their War machine as America tilts to them for cheap labor/ manufacturing purposes.
Pakistan has been having a lot of financial issues for several years now. They would not engage in these tactics because no moolah. |
Anonymous
|
Here are the receipts for Bill Clinton’s observations:
https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/CRECB-2006-pt8/html/CRECB-2006-pt8-Pg10183.htm |
Anonymous
|
President Clinton places the blame squarely on Hindu militants, not
on the so-called Kashmiri Muslims that the Indian government tried to blame for the massacre. In 2002, the Washington Times reported that the government finally admitted its responsibility and admitted that the evidence that it used to pin the blame on Kashmiris was false. Reporter Barry Bearak of the New York Times also placed the blame squarely on the Indian government, as did two independent investigations, one by the International Human Rights Organization, which is based in Ludhiana, and the other conducted jointly by the Punjab Human Rights Organization and the Movement Against State Repression. The evidence is overwhelming, yet Indian sycophants continue to deny the government's responsibility. Unfortunately, this massacre would have been swept under the rug if not for the outstanding efforts of the organizations mentioned above and of the Council of Khalistan, which has painstakingly documented any new developments. I am indebted to them for bringing this to my attention. The massacre was part of a pattern of repression of minorities that has brought about the murders of over 250,000 Sikhs, more than 300,000 Christians in Nagaland alone, over 90,000 Muslims in Kashmir alone, and Christians and Muslims throughout the country, as well as tens of thousands of Assamese, Bodos, Dalits, Manipuris, Tamils, and other minorities. This is one reason that it is essential to cut off our aid and trade to India and to demand a free and fair plebiscite in Punjab, Khalistan, in Kashmir, in Nagalim, and wherever people are seeking their freedom. This is the only way to bring freedom, peace, stability, and dignity to all the people of south Asia. I would like to introduce the press release from the Council of Khalistan on Secretary Albright's book into the Record at this time. |