MSM not reporting Pakistan and India on the brink of war.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Pakistan would probably win despite being smaller. Islamic armies tend to have more uniformity. The Hindu caste system probably wouldn’t make for as strong of an army, and then there are Indian Muslims who will be suspected of loyalty to Pakistan so it’ll be a mess for India given how large and diverse it is across the board

Then why did India come out on top in all of the previous India-Pakistan conflicts?

Pakistan is, unfortunately, a failed/failing state. Their national unity is based largely on anti-India sentiment which doesn't really work long term to build a functioning nation. India, for all of its internal wrangling and faults, is at least trying to stand on its own two feet.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Pakistan would probably win despite being smaller. Islamic armies tend to have more uniformity. The Hindu caste system probably wouldn’t make for as strong of an army, and then there are Indian Muslims who will be suspected of loyalty to Pakistan so it’ll be a mess for India given how large and diverse it is across the board

Then why did India come out on top in all of the previous India-Pakistan conflicts?

Pakistan is, unfortunately, a failed/failing state. Their national unity is based largely on anti-India sentiment which doesn't really work long term to build a functioning nation. India, for all of its internal wrangling and faults, is at least trying to stand on its own two feet.

+1 so many people who know so little are obsessed with caste as if other countries don't have class, race, etc issues.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:President Trump-the Peace Maker

https://time.com/7284654/india-pakistan-ceasefire-trump-us-mediation-kashmir-conflict-strikes/

No Nobel, though. Nah.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:President Trump-the Peace Maker

https://time.com/7284654/india-pakistan-ceasefire-trump-us-mediation-kashmir-conflict-strikes/

If Trump can solve this matter, he can secure a Nobel Peace Prize.

i think this is already in discussion.

Nobel will NEVER do this. Ever. EVER.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Pakistan would probably win despite being smaller. Islamic armies tend to have more uniformity. The Hindu caste system probably wouldn’t make for as strong of an army, and then there are Indian Muslims who will be suspected of loyalty to Pakistan so it’ll be a mess for India given how large and diverse it is across the board

Then why did India come out on top in all of the previous India-Pakistan conflicts?

Pakistan is, unfortunately, a failed/failing state. Their national unity is based largely on anti-India sentiment which doesn't really work long term to build a functioning nation. India, for all of its internal wrangling and faults, is at least trying to stand on its own two feet.

Funny stuff! Lol

The current president- Modi was not even allowed to step foot in the United States when Obama was president because he was known as the “butcher of Gujurat,” for inciting violence against minorities. This has continued and gotten worse under his his leadership. His BJP party are fascists and all the recent immigrants from India are insular and completely racists. Why do you think they are having issues with HR in Silicon Valley? They won’t even hire certain castes —IN AMERICA.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Pakistan would probably win despite being smaller. Islamic armies tend to have more uniformity. The Hindu caste system probably wouldn’t make for as strong of an army, and then there are Indian Muslims who will be suspected of loyalty to Pakistan so it’ll be a mess for India given how large and diverse it is across the board

Then why did India come out on top in all of the previous India-Pakistan conflicts?

Pakistan is, unfortunately, a failed/failing state. Their national unity is based largely on anti-India sentiment which doesn't really work long term to build a functioning nation. India, for all of its internal wrangling and faults, is at least trying to stand on its own two feet.

Funny stuff! Lol

The current president- Modi was not even allowed to step foot in the United States when Obama was president because he was known as the “butcher of Gujurat,” for inciting violence against minorities. This has continued and gotten worse under his his leadership. His BJP party are fascists and all the recent immigrants from India are insular and completely racists. Why do you think they are having issues with HR in Silicon Valley? They won’t even hire certain castes —IN AMERICA.

Arguing against a point that wasn't made - lol indeed.

"all the recent immigrants from India are insular and completely racists" is kind of ... racist?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Pakistan would probably win despite being smaller. Islamic armies tend to have more uniformity. The Hindu caste system probably wouldn’t make for as strong of an army, and then there are Indian Muslims who will be suspected of loyalty to Pakistan so it’ll be a mess for India given how large and diverse it is across the board

Then why did India come out on top in all of the previous India-Pakistan conflicts?

Pakistan is, unfortunately, a failed/failing state. Their national unity is based largely on anti-India sentiment which doesn't really work long term to build a functioning nation. India, for all of its internal wrangling and faults, is at least trying to stand on its own two feet.

India has not gotten past internal wrangling and faults. They need to be concerned about no civil war among Indian Muslims vs Hindus. They don’t have the bandwidth to fight Pakistan which is supported by China and Russia and will get supported by the ME. It’s rumored the Saudis helped fund Pakistans nuclear program. So yes, India won’t have much support as the US is also invested with Saudi and in Pakistan. India doesn’t have money or unity/social cohesion in their corner

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Pakistan would probably win despite being smaller. Islamic armies tend to have more uniformity. The Hindu caste system probably wouldn’t make for as strong of an army, and then there are Indian Muslims who will be suspected of loyalty to Pakistan so it’ll be a mess for India given how large and diverse it is across the board

Then why did India come out on top in all of the previous India-Pakistan conflicts?

Pakistan is, unfortunately, a failed/failing state. Their national unity is based largely on anti-India sentiment which doesn't really work long term to build a functioning nation. India, for all of its internal wrangling and faults, is at least trying to stand on its own two feet.

India has not gotten past internal wrangling and faults. They need to be concerned about no civil war among Indian Muslims vs Hindus. They don’t have the bandwidth to fight Pakistan which is supported by China and Russia and will get supported by the ME. It’s rumored the Saudis helped fund Pakistans nuclear program. So yes, India won’t have much support as the US is also invested with Saudi and in Pakistan. India doesn’t have money or unity/social cohesion in their corner

No claim that India has gotten past internal issues. The make-up of India is a complicated Venn diagram of religions, cultures, and ethnicities - not simple M v H.

Why would the larger international community support Pakistan? Pakistan is loaded with debt with not much to offer other than its strategic location in South Asia. Russia has historically been an ally to India. China wants to protect their investment and would more likely tell Pakistan to cool it with supporting terrorism. Why would the US, and especially this administration, care beyond destabilizing markets? Why would the ME actively get involved?