Canary Mission - they provided Trump with hit list of people to deport or imprison

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:There are people on this list who did nothing more than add their names to a petition.

The woman abducted in Boston did not organize protests. The only thing she did was co-author an op-ed for Tufts student newspaper and that got her added to Canary Mission's hit list.

Here is the article she wrote. I see nothing "pro Hamas" in it:

https://www.tuftsdaily.com/article/2024/03/4ftk27sm6jkj

Of course, I am willing to hear if the federal government has more information that is non-public. But they need to do that in a court of law, instead of sending her to some gulag in Louisiana.

This is the most terrifying part. They don’t need to show proof to anyone. They can say a random soccer player is a gang banger or someone is a terrorist threat and people have no recourse to prove they are innocent. And MAGAs are too dense to realize that it’s not going to stop with “those” people. And those of us who dare question any of this are told we are pro gang members, etc. There is a lawful way to deport people. But this isn’t about deporting people, it’s about sending a message to the public that you best keep your head down.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I’d never heard of this website before but looking at it, I notice they are very comfortable publishing the names and faces of all sorts of individuals…

…except those who fund, run, or update this website. That’s a total black box.

Yes, I hope people begin doxxing the canary mission gestapo police.

Should we do the same to the online sleuths who doxxed Jan 6 protesters?

The hypocrisy is stunning.

Wake me up when the individuals protesting events in the ME are also storming federal properties, attacking the apparatus of our government, threatening to harm the leaders of the country, and initiating the violent assault and battery of law enforcement, you mouthbreathing troglodyte.

Your defense of these events occurring in real time by trying to compare them to what occurred following 1/6 is beyond reprehensible. Skyscraper yourself.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:There are people on this list who did nothing more than add their names to a petition.

The woman abducted in Boston did not organize protests. The only thing she did was co-author an op-ed for Tufts student newspaper and that got her added to Canary Mission's hit list.

Here is the article she wrote. I see nothing "pro Hamas" in it:

https://www.tuftsdaily.com/article/2024/03/4ftk27sm6jkj

Of course, I am willing to hear if the federal government has more information that is non-public. But they need to do that in a court of law, instead of sending her to some gulag in Louisiana.

This is the most terrifying part. They don’t need to show proof to anyone. They can say a random soccer player is a gang banger or someone is a terrorist threat and people have no recourse to prove they are innocent. And MAGAs are too dense to realize that it’s not going to stop with “those” people. And those of us who dare question any of this are told we are pro gang members, etc. There is a lawful way to deport people. But this isn’t about deporting people, it’s about sending a message to the public that you best keep your head down.

This! It's about implementing "obedience in advance." The MAGA administration only has to target a few individuals/institutions in each category it is targeting ("gang members", law firms, foreign students, universities, etc.) in order to achieve widespread obedience in those areas--and to send the general message to everyone in this country that it is best not to question the authority of the president or the federal government.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I’d never heard of this website before but looking at it, I notice they are very comfortable publishing the names and faces of all sorts of individuals…

…except those who fund, run, or update this website. That’s a total black box.

Yes, I hope people begin doxxing the canary mission gestapo police.

Should we do the same to the online sleuths who doxxed Jan 6 protesters?

The hypocrisy is stunning.

Wake me up when the individuals protesting events in the ME are also storming federal properties, attacking the apparatus of our government, threatening to harm the leaders of the country, and initiating the violent assault and battery of law enforcement, you mouthbreathing troglodyte.

Your defense of these events occurring in real time by trying to compare them to what occurred following 1/6 is beyond reprehensible. Skyscraper yourself.

Touched a nerve?

FTR, I loathe both the Jan 6ers and the lawbreaking pro-Hamas vandals out there calling for “Death to America” and celebrating the murder of Americans.

Have no problem with either group being doxxed.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I’d never heard of this website before but looking at it, I notice they are very comfortable publishing the names and faces of all sorts of individuals…

…except those who fund, run, or update this website. That’s a total black box.

Yes, I hope people begin doxxing the canary mission gestapo police.

Should we do the same to the online sleuths who doxxed Jan 6 protesters?

The hypocrisy is stunning.

Wake me up when the individuals protesting events in the ME are also storming federal properties, attacking the apparatus of our government, threatening to harm the leaders of the country, and initiating the violent assault and battery of law enforcement, you mouthbreathing troglodyte.

Your defense of these events occurring in real time by trying to compare them to what occurred following 1/6 is beyond reprehensible. Skyscraper yourself.

Touched a nerve?

FTR, I loathe both the Jan 6ers and the lawbreaking pro-Hamas vandals out there calling for “Death to America” and celebrating the murder of Americans.

Have no problem with either group being doxxed.

She did none of this with her op-ed. It wasn't pro-Hamas, and she has not vandalized anything or called for "Death to America." How ignorant you are.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I’d never heard of this website before but looking at it, I notice they are very comfortable publishing the names and faces of all sorts of individuals…

…except those who fund, run, or update this website. That’s a total black box.

Yes, I hope people begin doxxing the canary mission gestapo police.

Should we do the same to the online sleuths who doxxed Jan 6 protesters?

The hypocrisy is stunning.

Wake me up when the individuals protesting events in the ME are also storming federal properties, attacking the apparatus of our government, threatening to harm the leaders of the country, and initiating the violent assault and battery of law enforcement, you mouthbreathing troglodyte.

Your defense of these events occurring in real time by trying to compare them to what occurred following 1/6 is beyond reprehensible. Skyscraper yourself.

Touched a nerve?

FTR, I loathe both the Jan 6ers and the lawbreaking pro-Hamas vandals out there calling for “Death to America” and celebrating the murder of Americans.

Have no problem with either group being doxxed.

Sure. Please do shard with everyone where any one of the individuals being blacksited have called for that or celebrated that …

And no, you didn’t touch a nerve. Individuals like me are de-sensitized to individuals like you, thankfully. We don’t twist in the wind allowing for the possibility of your redemption. Denny Green said it best …

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I’d never heard of this website before but looking at it, I notice they are very comfortable publishing the names and faces of all sorts of individuals…

…except those who fund, run, or update this website. That’s a total black box.

Yes, I hope people begin doxxing the canary mission gestapo police.

Should we do the same to the online sleuths who doxxed Jan 6 protesters?

The hypocrisy is stunning.

Wake me up when the individuals protesting events in the ME are also storming federal properties, attacking the apparatus of our government, threatening to harm the leaders of the country, and initiating the violent assault and battery of law enforcement, you mouthbreathing troglodyte.

Your defense of these events occurring in real time by trying to compare them to what occurred following 1/6 is beyond reprehensible. Skyscraper yourself.

Touched a nerve?

FTR, I loathe both the Jan 6ers and the lawbreaking pro-Hamas vandals out there calling for “Death to America” and celebrating the murder of Americans.

Have no problem with either group being doxxed.

Are you likewise “no problemo” with the doxxing of supporters of any organization or entity that threatens the freedoms enshrined in our constitution, like the cloaked entity at the heart of this discussion? You’re cool with that, right?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I’d never heard of this website before but looking at it, I notice they are very comfortable publishing the names and faces of all sorts of individuals…

…except those who fund, run, or update this website. That’s a total black box.

Yes, I hope people begin doxxing the canary mission gestapo police.

Should we do the same to the online sleuths who doxxed Jan 6 protesters?

The hypocrisy is stunning.

Wake me up when the individuals protesting events in the ME are also storming federal properties, attacking the apparatus of our government, threatening to harm the leaders of the country, and initiating the violent assault and battery of law enforcement, you mouthbreathing troglodyte.

Your defense of these events occurring in real time by trying to compare them to what occurred following 1/6 is beyond reprehensible. Skyscraper yourself.

Touched a nerve?

FTR, I loathe both the Jan 6ers and the lawbreaking pro-Hamas vandals out there calling for “Death to America” and celebrating the murder of Americans.

Have no problem with either group being doxxed.

Regarding the bolded, that statement is true of everyone except those defending 1/6 (who are legion, and who currently lead our government) and the minuscule number who are “lawbreaking pro-Hamas vandals out there calling for “Death to America” and celebrating the murder of Americans“. The rest of us loathe both groups, as well.

Here’s the problem, though. There are several thousand people, if not more, who defend 1/6 for every one person doing that lawbreaking, pro-Hamas bullshit. None in either category should be allowed to escape accountability.

THE ISSUE is that the former are dismantling our constitution and utilizing fascist policies to ensnare others who have not committed any crimes and who have not violated any non-ambiguous immigration policies, thereby roping them into the latter category.

To silence dissent. To snuff out freedom.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:There are people on this list who did nothing more than add their names to a petition.

The woman abducted in Boston did not organize protests. The only thing she did was co-author an op-ed for Tufts student newspaper and that got her added to Canary Mission's hit list.

Here is the article she wrote. I see nothing "pro Hamas" in it:

https://www.tuftsdaily.com/article/2024/03/4ftk27sm6jkj

Of course, I am willing to hear if the federal government has more information that is non-public. But they need to do that in a court of law, instead of sending her to some gulag in Louisiana.

This is the most terrifying part. They don’t need to show proof to anyone. They can say a random soccer player is a gang banger or someone is a terrorist threat and people have no recourse to prove they are innocent. And MAGAs are too dense to realize that it’s not going to stop with “those” people. And those of us who dare question any of this are told we are pro gang members, etc. There is a lawful way to deport people. But this isn’t about deporting people, it’s about sending a message to the public that you best keep your head down.

This! It's about implementing "obedience in advance." The MAGA administration only has to target a few individuals/institutions in each category it is targeting ("gang members", law firms, foreign students, universities, etc.) in order to achieve widespread obedience in those areas--and to send the general message to everyone in this country that it is best not to question the authority of the president or the federal government.

You know they've been doing this for about a decade now? You probably didn't care though because they were targeting Americans before Oct 7.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:There are people on this list who did nothing more than add their names to a petition.

The woman abducted in Boston did not organize protests. The only thing she did was co-author an op-ed for Tufts student newspaper and that got her added to Canary Mission's hit list.

Here is the article she wrote. I see nothing "pro Hamas" in it:

https://www.tuftsdaily.com/article/2024/03/4ftk27sm6jkj

Of course, I am willing to hear if the federal government has more information that is non-public. But they need to do that in a court of law, instead of sending her to some gulag in Louisiana.

This is the most terrifying part. They don’t need to show proof to anyone. They can say a random soccer player is a gang banger or someone is a terrorist threat and people have no recourse to prove they are innocent. And MAGAs are too dense to realize that it’s not going to stop with “those” people. And those of us who dare question any of this are told we are pro gang members, etc. There is a lawful way to deport people. But this isn’t about deporting people, it’s about sending a message to the public that you best keep your head down.

This! It's about implementing "obedience in advance." The MAGA administration only has to target a few individuals/institutions in each category it is targeting ("gang members", law firms, foreign students, universities, etc.) in order to achieve widespread obedience in those areas--and to send the general message to everyone in this country that it is best not to question the authority of the president or the federal government.

You know they've been doing this for about a decade now? You probably didn't care though because they were targeting Americans before Oct 7.

Can you clarify your point because the snark isn’t getting the job done?

Are you actually trying to undermine criticism of this unAmerican doxxing entity by circling back to some hocus pocus anti-semitism horseshit?

[Anonymous]

Oh my God, barf. Just barf.

https://canarymission.org/ex-canary

This some Inquisition-level crap here. Congrats, Israel. You have just about ensured no educated person in America will ever support you again. I hope you’re prepared to stand on your own and reckon with the situation you’ve created for yourself. It’s time this petulant little child learns how to walk by herself.

[Anonymous]

Do they tattoo the ex-canaries on a conspicuous part of their bodies? Require them to wear a scarlet letter? Or do we need smart glasses to recognize them on the street so we can properly shame them for their disgusting sins of sympathy and such?

[Anonymous]

The crazy thing to me is not that this doxing website exists--the US offers limited protection against doxing--but that ICE is using it to identify people to arrest without apparently doing their own research first! They are sloppy and unAmerican in everything they do. They want the spectacle--and example they set--of these removals without due process or producing evidence.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:There are people on this list who did nothing more than add their names to a petition.

The woman abducted in Boston did not organize protests. The only thing she did was co-author an op-ed for Tufts student newspaper and that got her added to Canary Mission's hit list.

Here is the article she wrote. I see nothing "pro Hamas" in it:

https://www.tuftsdaily.com/article/2024/03/4ftk27sm6jkj

Of course, I am willing to hear if the federal government has more information that is non-public. But they need to do that in a court of law, instead of sending her to some gulag in Louisiana.

This is the most terrifying part. They don’t need to show proof to anyone. They can say a random soccer player is a gang banger or someone is a terrorist threat and people have no recourse to prove they are innocent. And MAGAs are too dense to realize that it’s not going to stop with “those” people. And those of us who dare question any of this are told we are pro gang members, etc. There is a lawful way to deport people. But this isn’t about deporting people, it’s about sending a message to the public that you best keep your head down.

This! It's about implementing "obedience in advance." The MAGA administration only has to target a few individuals/institutions in each category it is targeting ("gang members", law firms, foreign students, universities, etc.) in order to achieve widespread obedience in those areas--and to send the general message to everyone in this country that it is best not to question the authority of the president or the federal government.

You know they've been doing this for about a decade now? You probably didn't care though because they were targeting Americans before Oct 7.

Can you clarify your point because the snark isn’t getting the job done?

Are you actually trying to undermine criticism of this unAmerican doxxing entity by circling back to some hocus pocus anti-semitism horseshit?

The point being is that you can draw a straight line from what was done to Charlottesville protestors in 2017 to what's going on today. Most people here cheered that on by the way.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:There are people on this list who did nothing more than add their names to a petition.

The woman abducted in Boston did not organize protests. The only thing she did was co-author an op-ed for Tufts student newspaper and that got her added to Canary Mission's hit list.

Here is the article she wrote. I see nothing "pro Hamas" in it:

https://www.tuftsdaily.com/article/2024/03/4ftk27sm6jkj

Of course, I am willing to hear if the federal government has more information that is non-public. But they need to do that in a court of law, instead of sending her to some gulag in Louisiana.

This is the most terrifying part. They don’t need to show proof to anyone. They can say a random soccer player is a gang banger or someone is a terrorist threat and people have no recourse to prove they are innocent. And MAGAs are too dense to realize that it’s not going to stop with “those” people. And those of us who dare question any of this are told we are pro gang members, etc. There is a lawful way to deport people. But this isn’t about deporting people, it’s about sending a message to the public that you best keep your head down.

This! It's about implementing "obedience in advance." The MAGA administration only has to target a few individuals/institutions in each category it is targeting ("gang members", law firms, foreign students, universities, etc.) in order to achieve widespread obedience in those areas--and to send the general message to everyone in this country that it is best not to question the authority of the president or the federal government.

You know they've been doing this for about a decade now? You probably didn't care though because they were targeting Americans before Oct 7.

Can you clarify your point because the snark isn’t getting the job done?

Are you actually trying to undermine criticism of this unAmerican doxxing entity by circling back to some hocus pocus anti-semitism horseshit?

The point being is that you can draw a straight line from what was done to Charlottesville protestors in 2017 to what's going on today. Most people here cheered that on by the way.

We rounded up and deported Charlottesville protestors? Or we identified them for the racist POS that they are and there were social consequences as a result?

The Constitution never protected anyone from private action. What we have here is government action. Government punishment of anti-Israel speech.