69 Million Married Women who changed their names may lose the right to vote under the SAVE act

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:[b]

Anonymous wrote:There is a huge amount of misinformation in this thread. Real ID drivers license is not sufficient. States don’t have to accept BC + MC and can impose additional vague limits. This will end mail in voting and registration and will require a passport to vote. Only half of Americans have a passport.

Repeal of the 19th amendment is part of P2025. This is a step in that direction. Please read the below links for more details. If you think women have the right to vote, you should oppose this strenuously.


https://www.newsweek.com/married-women-stopped-voting-save-act-2029325

https://www.americanprogress.org/article/the-save-act-would-disenfranchise-millions-of-citizens/

I encourage you to read the bill itself.

I have.

The two articles above quote the bill directly and break down the effects. The regime frequently uses poorly written bills and EOs to help camouflage what they are doing. Providing clear, understandable analysis helps people understand these destructive bills.

I read the articles and the bill. Not concerned. The analysis was not persuasive. So the bill didn’t contemplate every permutation. That’s basically every bill written. That’s what regulations are for. Women will not be disenfranchised. That’s a ridiculous assertion on its face.

And roe will never be overturned.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Sounds like OP is overreacting.

I've seen this in other venues with similar concerns.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:[b]

Anonymous wrote:There is a huge amount of misinformation in this thread. Real ID drivers license is not sufficient. States don’t have to accept BC + MC and can impose additional vague limits. This will end mail in voting and registration and will require a passport to vote. Only half of Americans have a passport.

Repeal of the 19th amendment is part of P2025. This is a step in that direction. Please read the below links for more details. If you think women have the right to vote, you should oppose this strenuously.


https://www.newsweek.com/married-women-stopped-voting-save-act-2029325

https://www.americanprogress.org/article/the-save-act-would-disenfranchise-millions-of-citizens/

I encourage you to read the bill itself.

I have.

The two articles above quote the bill directly and break down the effects. The regime frequently uses poorly written bills and EOs to help camouflage what they are doing. Providing clear, understandable analysis helps people understand these destructive bills.

I read the articles and the bill. Not concerned. The analysis was not persuasive. So the bill didn’t contemplate every permutation. That’s basically every bill written. That’s what regulations are for. Women will not be disenfranchised. That’s a ridiculous assertion on its face.

And roe will never be overturned.

Exactly. Why the naivety?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:There is a huge amount of misinformation in this thread. Real ID drivers license is not sufficient. States don’t have to accept BC + MC and can impose additional vague limits. This will end mail in voting and registration and will require a passport to vote. Only half of Americans have a passport.

Repeal of the 19th amendment is part of P2025. This is a step in that direction. Please read the below links for more details. If you think women have the right to vote, you should oppose this strenuously.


https://www.newsweek.com/married-women-stopped-voting-save-act-2029325

https://www.americanprogress.org/article/the-save-act-would-disenfranchise-millions-of-citizens/

I encourage you to read the bill itself.

I have.

The two articles above quote the bill directly and break down the effects. The regime frequently uses poorly written bills and EOs to help camouflage what they are doing. Providing clear, understandable analysis helps people understand these destructive bills.

I read the articles and the bill. Not concerned. The analysis was not persuasive. So the bill didn’t contemplate every permutation. That’s basically every bill written. That’s what regulations are for. Women will not be disenfranchised. That’s a ridiculous assertion on its face.

[b]
And roe will never be overturned.

I don't care. 4 reasons - 1) As an South Asian immigrant, premarital sex (or unprotected sex) is never on the table. Most of our teen and twenties go in studying hard and we don't have time to fux around. 2) We can fly back to South Asia to get a medical abortion for less than $50. 3) This impacts the White Christian women who voted for Trump and I think they deserve unhappiness and 4) Poor URMs are ok with having the babies.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Gee, I wonder how in the hell I got my Real ID when my birth name didn't match my current name.

That was before Project 25. It's targeting women's voting rights.

[Anonymous]

Please STOP, there is enough legitimate stuff to pay attention to.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Gee, I wonder how in the hell I got my Real ID when my birth name didn't match my current name.

That was before Project 25. It's targeting women's voting rights.

Under what section in Project 25? I’m willing to be persuaded.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:They can just bring their marriage license or court-ordered name change along with the birth certificate. A passport would also work if one has one.

oh sure... totally makes sense for WOMEN to bring MORE documentation as extra proof to vote. Make it harder is the plan but sure continue to downplay it by saying "just bring..."

Just bring your Real ID. That’s it. Same as everyone else.

It says a REAL ID that indicates citizenship. My MD lD doesn’t indicate citizenship it just indicates that I have legal status, which I do as a citizen. So, it wouldn’t work in this situation.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:There is a huge amount of misinformation in this thread. Real ID drivers license is not sufficient. States don’t have to accept BC + MC and can impose additional vague limits. This will end mail in voting and registration and will require a passport to vote. Only half of Americans have a passport.

Repeal of the 19th amendment is part of P2025. This is a step in that direction. Please read the below links for more details. If you think women have the right to vote, you should oppose this strenuously.


https://www.newsweek.com/married-women-stopped-voting-save-act-2029325

https://www.americanprogress.org/article/the-save-act-would-disenfranchise-millions-of-citizens/

I encourage you to read the bill itself.

I have.

The two articles above quote the bill directly and break down the effects. The regime frequently uses poorly written bills and EOs to help camouflage what they are doing. Providing clear, understandable analysis helps people understand these destructive bills.

I read the articles and the bill. Not concerned. The analysis was not persuasive. So the bill didn’t contemplate every permutation. That’s basically every bill written. That’s what regulations are for. Women will not be disenfranchised. That’s a ridiculous assertion on its face.

[b]
And roe will never be overturned.

I don't care. 4 reasons - 1) As a South Asian immigrant, premarital sex (or unprotected sex) is never on the table. Most of our teen and twenties go in studying hard and we don't have time to fux around. 2) We can fly back to South Asia to get a medical abortion for less than $50. 3) This impacts the White Christian women who voted for Trump and I think they deserve unhappiness and 4) Poor URMs are ok with having the babies.

Where can you get airline tickets to South Asia for less than $50?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:There is a huge amount of misinformation in this thread. Real ID drivers license is not sufficient. States don’t have to accept BC + MC and can impose additional vague limits. This will end mail in voting and registration and will require a passport to vote. Only half of Americans have a passport.

Repeal of the 19th amendment is part of P2025. This is a step in that direction. Please read the below links for more details. If you think women have the right to vote, you should oppose this strenuously.


https://www.newsweek.com/married-women-stopped-voting-save-act-2029325

https://www.americanprogress.org/article/the-save-act-would-disenfranchise-millions-of-citizens/

I encourage you to read the bill itself.

I have.

The two articles above quote the bill directly and break down the effects. The regime frequently uses poorly written bills and EOs to help camouflage what they are doing. Providing clear, understandable analysis helps people understand these destructive bills.

I read the articles and the bill. Not concerned. The analysis was not persuasive. So the bill didn’t contemplate every permutation. That’s basically every bill written. That’s what regulations are for. Women will not be disenfranchised. That’s a ridiculous assertion on its face.

[b]
And roe will never be overturned.

I don't care. 4 reasons - 1) As a South Asian immigrant, premarital sex (or unprotected sex) is never on the table. Most of our teen and twenties go in studying hard and we don't have time to fux around. 2) We can fly back to South Asia to get a medical abortion for less than $50. 3) This impacts the White Christian women who voted for Trump and I think they deserve unhappiness and 4) Poor URMs are ok with having the babies.

Where can you get airline tickets to South Asia for less than $50?

You think South Asian immigrant women never have premarital sex? Hahahahahahahahahaha.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Or, we should stop changing our names when we get married and not worry about it.

'''

I bet they would punish that group of women even more than those who changed names if they could

[Anonymous]

https://www.newsweek.com/married-women-stopped-voting-save-act-2029325

"He pointed to a clause in the SAVE Act that leaves it up to each state to establish a process for applicants to "provide additional documentation to the appropriate election official of the State as may be necessary to establish that the applicant is a citizen of the United States in the event of a discrepancy with respect to the applicant's documentary proof of United States citizenship."

Also from the same article (and spot on):
"This is absurd armchair speculation being spun up by media outlets who care more about clicks than reality...This bill isn't being attacked because it'll exclude citizens from voting — it won't. It's being attacked because the policy is wildly popular with the American people, its opponents want and need illegals to vote, and they'll use anything they can to attack it."

The attempts at drumming up hysteria are just amusing at this point.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:They can just bring their marriage license or court-ordered name change along with the birth certificate. A passport would also work if one has one.

oh sure... totally makes sense for WOMEN to bring MORE documentation as extra proof to vote. Make it harder is the plan but sure continue to downplay it by saying "just bring..."

Just bring your Real ID. That’s it. Same as everyone else.

It says a REAL ID that indicates citizenship. My MD lD doesn’t indicate citizenship it just indicates that I have legal status, which I do as a citizen. So, it wouldn’t work in this situation.

That makes it more likely that it isn’t going to pass. Or, if it does, that States will drag their feet. How long have they been working on the Real ID? It’ll take forever to implement something new.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:There is a huge amount of misinformation in this thread. Real ID drivers license is not sufficient. States don’t have to accept BC + MC and can impose additional vague limits. This will end mail in voting and registration and will require a passport to vote. Only half of Americans have a passport.

Repeal of the 19th amendment is part of P2025. This is a step in that direction. Please read the below links for more details. If you think women have the right to vote, you should oppose this strenuously.


https://www.newsweek.com/married-women-stopped-voting-save-act-2029325

https://www.americanprogress.org/article/the-save-act-would-disenfranchise-millions-of-citizens/

I encourage you to read the bill itself.

I have.

The two articles above quote the bill directly and break down the effects. The regime frequently uses poorly written bills and EOs to help camouflage what they are doing. Providing clear, understandable analysis helps people understand these destructive bills.

I read the articles and the bill. Not concerned. The analysis was not persuasive. So the bill didn’t contemplate every permutation. That’s basically every bill written. That’s what regulations are for. Women will not be disenfranchised. That’s a ridiculous assertion on its face.

[b]
And roe will never be overturned.

I don't care. 4 reasons - 1) As a South Asian immigrant, premarital sex (or unprotected sex) is never on the table. Most of our teen and twenties go in studying hard and we don't have time to fux around. 2) We can fly back to South Asia to get a medical abortion for less than $50. 3) This impacts the White Christian women who voted for Trump and I think they deserve unhappiness and 4) Poor URMs are ok with having the babies.

Where can you get airline tickets to South Asia for less than $50?

Medical Abortion for less than $50. Airline tickets between 1K-5K. (Depending on if you go Business class). Also, since we are not poor...we can afford airline tickets if abortion is needed. Medical tourism is doing very well in that part of the world,

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:They can just bring their marriage license or court-ordered name change along with the birth certificate. A passport would also work if one has one.

oh sure... totally makes sense for WOMEN to bring MORE documentation as extra proof to vote. Make it harder is the plan but sure continue to downplay it by saying "just bring..."

Just bring your Real ID. That’s it. Same as everyone else.

It says a REAL ID that indicates citizenship. My MD lD doesn’t indicate citizenship it just indicates that I have legal status, which I do as a citizen. So, it wouldn’t work in this situation.

That makes it more likely that it isn’t going to pass. Or, if it does, that States will drag their feet. How long have they been working on the Real ID? It’ll take forever to implement something new.

I will bring my US passport along. And my citizenship paper. And my driver's license. And my social security card. My kids will bring their birth certificate and their marriage certificate also. Thankfully, we did not have kids until we had our legal green cards in hand. Why should law abiding legal tax-paying immigrants be penalized?

I am sorry but I see no reason that people are allowed to vote without proper identification. What kind of bloody backward country is this? This nonsense does not happen in any other country.

If poor people do not have proper identification, the government needs to make sure that they have their documents with them based on biometrics.