How is federal employee's Severance Pay calculated (not RIFed yet, just a question)?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:A buyout is probably $25k. Severance is like 6-12 months salary.

Severance is no more than 12 months salary, but the specific amount depends on your age and years of service.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:What happen if RIFed (get severance pay) then accepted another fed position later (a few months later or 1-2 years later)?

The severance is not paid in a lump sum, you basically keep getting a paycheck until the amount runs out. If you take another federal job before the money runs out, you stop getting it.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Are you a DEI employee? Those are the only ones getting RIFed. I don’t believe the remote workers who don’t want to move will get severance.

Who knows if this administration will follow the law, but employees should receive severance if they decline reassignment outside their geographic region.

That is not what happened for ERS when they moved it to Kansas City.

That's not true. Severance was a part of the package. Along with ab ictap ctap letter.

Are you one of them? I am. If severance was offered it was so small to be not memorable. And I had been there for 10 years.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Are you a DEI employee? Those are the only ones getting RIFed. I don’t believe the remote workers who don’t want to move will get severance.

Who knows if this administration will follow the law, but employees should receive severance if they decline reassignment outside their geographic region.

No this isn’t what I saw happen a decade ago. I don’t think that’s standard.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Are you a DEI employee? Those are the only ones getting RIFed. I don’t believe the remote workers who don’t want to move will get severance.

Who knows if this administration will follow the law, but employees should receive severance if they decline reassignment outside their geographic region.

That is not what happened for ERS when they moved it to Kansas City.

That's not true. Severance was a part of the package. Along with ab ictap ctap letter.

Are you one of them? I am. If severance was offered it was so small to be not memorable. And I had been there for 10 years.

10 years of service, under 40 years old, would mean 10 weeks pay.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Are you a DEI employee? Those are the only ones getting RIFed. I don’t believe the remote workers who don’t want to move will get severance.

Who knows if this administration will follow the law, but employees should receive severance if they decline reassignment outside their geographic region.

That is not what happened for ERS when they moved it to Kansas City.

That's not true. Severance was a part of the package. Along with ab ictap ctap letter.

Are you one of them? I am. If severance was offered it was so small to be not memorable. And I had been there for 10 years.

10 years of service, under 40 years old, would mean 10 weeks pay.

It was nowhere near that.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Are you a DEI employee? Those are the only ones getting RIFed. I don’t believe the remote workers who don’t want to move will get severance.

Who knows if this administration will follow the law, but employees should receive severance if they decline reassignment outside their geographic region.

That is not what happened for ERS when they moved it to Kansas City.

That's not true. Severance was a part of the package. Along with ab ictap ctap letter.

Are you one of them? I am. If severance was offered it was so small to be not memorable. And I had been there for 10 years.

10 years of service, under 40 years old, would mean 10 weeks pay.

It was nowhere near that.

I think you got tricked into accepting voluntary separation (VSIP) rather than waiting for them to involuntarily separate you (severance).

[Anonymous]

None of this matters, guys, if you're on the new Schedule F. You will not get severance. I'm not sure why people aren't more focused on Schedule F.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:None of this matters, guys, if you're on the new Schedule F. You will not get severance. I'm not sure why people aren't more focused on Schedule F.

There isn't schedule F yet and many of us aren't going to be moved to it.

[Anonymous]

Isn't Schedule F only for SES and high level policy-focused people?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Isn't Schedule F only for SES and high level policy-focused people?

Yes, and it will be awhile before it actually gets instituted.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:None of this matters, guys, if you're on the new Schedule F. You will not get severance. I'm not sure why people aren't more focused on Schedule F.

What’s your goal other than to process your anxiety out loud? Are you a fed?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Isn't Schedule F only for SES and high level policy-focused people?

When they were implementing it at OMB last time, it covered down to people like IT and admin assistants.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Isn't Schedule F only for SES and high level policy-focused people?

When they were implementing it at OMB last time, it covered down to people like IT and admin assistants.

Do you recall if there was some particular focus they all had, e.g., policy, or just whole cloth categorization?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Isn't Schedule F only for SES and high level policy-focused people?

When they were implementing it at OMB last time, it covered down to people like IT and admin assistants.

Do you recall if there was some particular focus they all had, e.g., policy, or just whole cloth categorization?

Yes it was policy.