How many new Supreme Court Justices will Trump appoint?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:The court needs reform and needs to be expanded to handle the increase workload. Every time they take some trans athlete case there are 100’s of businesses case that are not addressed. If a case is appealed to SCOTUS it should be heard in a reasonable time frame.

The Republicans have thoroughly corrupted the current court and selected only RWNJs a justices. So it is time to time limit appointments, force a strict code of conduct/ethics, enforce conflict of interests, increase the pool of judges to eliminate the gaming of the court and allow the incoming President to appoint a new majority(done within the time limits).

Also the House of Representatives needs to be increase by 100-120 representatives. Has not been increase in over a 100 years. The house was meant to be more representative vs what it is now.

There will be an outpost on the Moon before these things happen.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The court needs reform and needs to be expanded to handle the increase workload. Every time they take some trans athlete case there are 100’s of businesses case that are not addressed. If a case is appealed to SCOTUS it should be heard in a reasonable time frame.

The Republicans have thoroughly corrupted the current court and selected only RWNJs a justices. So it is time to time limit appointments, force a strict code of conduct/ethics, enforce conflict of interests, increase the pool of judges to eliminate the gaming of the court and allow the incoming President to appoint a new majority(done within the time limits).

Also the House of Representatives needs to be increase by 100-120 representatives. Has not been increase in over a 100 years. The house was meant to be more representative vs what it is now.

There will be an outpost on the Moon before these things happen.

Oh I would not be too sure about that. Republicans continue to suppress and oppose the voters you are just kicking the rebellion down the road. Trump needs to deliver in a tangible way not just for the billionaires. There is great unrest with the voters and trump is the establishment now.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:
Oh I would not be too sure about that. Republicans continue to suppress and oppose the voters you are just kicking the rebellion down the road. Trump needs to deliver in a tangible way not just for the billionaires. There is great unrest with the voters and trump is the establishment now.

Okay chicken little. Back to reality.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The court needs reform and needs to be expanded to handle the increase workload. Every time they take some trans athlete case there are 100’s of businesses case that are not addressed. If a case is appealed to SCOTUS it should be heard in a reasonable time frame.

The Republicans have thoroughly corrupted the current court and selected only RWNJs a justices. So it is time to time limit appointments, force a strict code of conduct/ethics, enforce conflict of interests, increase the pool of judges to eliminate the gaming of the court and allow the incoming President to appoint a new majority(done within the time limits).

Also the House of Representatives needs to be increase by 100-120 representatives. Has not been increase in over a 100 years. The house was meant to be more representative vs what it is now.

There will be an outpost on the Moon before these things happen.

Oh I would not be too sure about that. Republicans continue to suppress and oppose the voters you are just kicking the rebellion down the road. Trump needs to deliver in a tangible way not just for the billionaires. There is great unrest with the voters and trump is the establishment now.

Lol.. "deliver" to regular Americans??? No politicians with R and Ds next to their names work for regular Americans. Don't get your hopes up.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
Oh I would not be too sure about that. Republicans continue to suppress and oppose the voters you are just kicking the rebellion down the road. Trump needs to deliver in a tangible way not just for the billionaires. There is great unrest with the voters and trump is the establishment now.

Okay chicken little. Back to reality.

Yes unaccountable and corrupt SCOTUS will just continue supported by the likes of you.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Thomas will be 77. Alito will be 75. Sotomayor will be 71. Roberts will be 70.

The Supreme Court will get younger in the next 4 years. I'm sure the old conservatives will be pressured to retire. Thomas may just be cast out for his indiscretions. Sotomayor has some significant health issues. Perhaps Trump decided to pack the court.

Alito and Thomas are going to retire to cushy of counsel positions or emeritus positions.
Sotomayor is going to try to hold on, but we are going to be white knuckling it a bit.

Thomas loves power more than money and he loves sticking it to Democrats. Roberts isn't going to do anything about Thomas's lack of ethics so he will stay on the court and continue to take from his billionaire pals.

Thomas has never been the swing vote on any decision.
He could make 10 times what he makes now in the private sector.

Of course he was. Starting with Dobbs.

So you think his vote could have gone either way in Dobbs? He was the one on the bubble?
Or do you not understand what swing vote means?

Right now it looks like the swing votes are Barrett, Roberts and to a lesser extent Kavanaugh.

I could predicted how thomas, alito and gorsuch would vote on any case with 100% accuracy.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Thomas will be 77. Alito will be 75. Sotomayor will be 71. Roberts will be 70.

The Supreme Court will get younger in the next 4 years. I'm sure the old conservatives will be pressured to retire. Thomas may just be cast out for his indiscretions. Sotomayor has some significant health issues. Perhaps Trump decided to pack the court.

Alito and Thomas are going to retire to cushy of counsel positions or emeritus positions.
Sotomayor is going to try to hold on, but we are going to be white knuckling it a bit.

Thomas loves power more than money and he loves sticking it to Democrats. Roberts isn't going to do anything about Thomas's lack of ethics so he will stay on the court and continue to take from his billionaire pals.

Thomas has never been the swing vote on any decision.
He could make 10 times what he makes now in the private sector.

Of course he was. Starting with Dobbs.

ETA, there was no swing vote in Dobbs.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Thomas will be 77. Alito will be 75. Sotomayor will be 71. Roberts will be 70.

The Supreme Court will get younger in the next 4 years. I'm sure the old conservatives will be pressured to retire. Thomas may just be cast out for his indiscretions. Sotomayor has some significant health issues. Perhaps Trump decided to pack the court.

All were telling you to step down months ago, Sotamyor, now, hold on to '29.

[Anonymous]

Sotomayor won't make it.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Literally Martha Alito is on tape talking about hoping Trump is elected so Alito can retire.
He will retire
Thomas will retire
And their billionaire buddies will make sure it’s the right time for it.

I agree. And their billionaire buddies will ensure that both receive substantial post-retirement financial windfalls.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Thomas will be 77. Alito will be 75. Sotomayor will be 71. Roberts will be 70.

The Supreme Court will get younger in the next 4 years. I'm sure the old conservatives will be pressured to retire. Thomas may just be cast out for his indiscretions. Sotomayor has some significant health issues. Perhaps Trump decided to pack the court.

Alito and Thomas are going to retire to cushy of counsel positions or emeritus positions.
Sotomayor is going to try to hold on, but we are going to be white knuckling it a bit.

Thomas loves power more than money and he loves sticking it to Democrats. Roberts isn't going to do anything about Thomas's lack of ethics so he will stay on the court and continue to take from his billionaire pals.

Thomas has never been the swing vote on any decision.
He could make 10 times what he makes now in the private sector.

Thomas would make an official private sector lawyer.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:At least 4 to get to the Democrat Party goal of, minimum, 13. If he can get rid of Roberts and Sotomayor along with the retirements of Thomas and Alito which are coming? 8 seems like a good number to start.

The Democrats no longer believe this is in the best interests of the country.
They thought it was very important in 2022 and 2023.
I'm not sure what happened but they stopped believing this recently.

Biden killed that as soon as he came in to office. Biden was only concerned about not upsetting the Republicans and keeping the status quo.

The court needs reform and needs to be expanded to handle the increase workload. Every time they take some trans athlete case there are 100’s of businesses case that are not addressed. If a case is appealed to SCOTUS it should be heard in a reasonable time frame.

The Republicans have thoroughly corrupted the current court and selected only RWNJs a justices. So it is time to time limit appointments, force a strict code of conduct/ethics, enforce conflict of interests, increase the pool of judges to eliminate the gaming of the court and allow the incoming President to appoint a new majority(done within the time limits).

Also the House of Representatives needs to be increase by 100-120 representatives. Has not been increase in over a 100 years. The house was meant to be more representative vs what it is now.

Trumps nominees are generally pretty good. He just nominates whoever the heritage foundation tells him to nominate. Theya re definitely conservative but theya re well qualified and they are generally not nutjobs.

Biden's nominees have been pretty bad by comparison.

How would MORE SCOTUS justices allow the supreme court to hear more cases?

But If you really think we need more justices, I bet trump would agree.
But if you think we need more SCOTUS justices,

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Thomas will be 77. Alito will be 75. Sotomayor will be 71. Roberts will be 70.

The Supreme Court will get younger in the next 4 years. I'm sure the old conservatives will be pressured to retire. Thomas may just be cast out for his indiscretions. Sotomayor has some significant health issues. Perhaps Trump decided to pack the court.

Alito and Thomas are going to retire to cushy of counsel positions or emeritus positions.
Sotomayor is going to try to hold on, but we are going to be white knuckling it a bit.

Thomas loves power more than money and he loves sticking it to Democrats. Roberts isn't going to do anything about Thomas's lack of ethics so he will stay on the court and continue to take from his billionaire pals.

Thomas loves money as well. He lives the life of a 0.1% not merely 2%. Between his SC salary, and a normal salary for Gini, the Thomas would have HHI of $400-500K. But they are okay with having billionaires wine and dine them.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Thomas will be 77. Alito will be 75. Sotomayor will be 71. Roberts will be 70.

The Supreme Court will get younger in the next 4 years. I'm sure the old conservatives will be pressured to retire. Thomas may just be cast out for his indiscretions. Sotomayor has some significant health issues. Perhaps Trump decided to pack the court.

Alito and Thomas are going to retire to cushy of counsel positions or emeritus positions.
Sotomayor is going to try to hold on, but we are going to be white knuckling it a bit.

Thomas loves power more than money and he loves sticking it to Democrats. Roberts isn't going to do anything about Thomas's lack of ethics so he will stay on the court and continue to take from his billionaire pals.

Thomas has never been the swing vote on any decision.
He could make 10 times what he makes now in the private sector.

Of course he was. Starting with Dobbs.

ETA, there was no swing vote in Dobbs.

Read Robert's opinion carefully. That was a 5-4 vote.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Thomas will be 77. Alito will be 75. Sotomayor will be 71. Roberts will be 70.

The Supreme Court will get younger in the next 4 years. I'm sure the old conservatives will be pressured to retire. Thomas may just be cast out for his indiscretions. Sotomayor has some significant health issues. Perhaps Trump decided to pack the court.

Alito and Thomas are going to retire to cushy of counsel positions or emeritus positions.
Sotomayor is going to try to hold on, but we are going to be white knuckling it a bit.

Thomas loves power more than money and he loves sticking it to Democrats. Roberts isn't going to do anything about Thomas's lack of ethics so he will stay on the court and continue to take from his billionaire pals.

Thomas has never been the swing vote on any decision.
He could make 10 times what he makes now in the private sector.

Of course he was. Starting with Dobbs.

So you think his vote could have gone either way in Dobbs? He was the one on the bubble?
Or do you not understand what swing vote means?

Right now it looks like the swing votes are Barrett, Roberts and to a lesser extent Kavanaugh.

I could predicted how thomas, alito and gorsuch would vote on any case with 100% accuracy.

They have all been swing votes. My point on Dobbs was it was 5-4 so Thomas vs a different new justice would have switched that result.
There are other cases where those three voted differently than expected.