Homan: ‘I guarantee’ funds will be cut from states not cooperating on deportation

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Homan is a badass. Hope he lives up to all his plans and then some.

I guess. He doesn't seem to understand that most of the money that he talks about withholding is coming from the states that he likes to yell about withholding it from.

Unlike your "guess," Homan actually understands what he is doing. Next.

Are you him?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:If Dems can threaten (red) states with cutting off highway funding if those states won’t enforce federal laws with regards to guns or Title IX (and what roads have to do with federal gun laws or women’s sports is beyond me…) then it seems like it’s also fair to threaten blue states with various funding cut-offs for not enforcing immigration laws.

Seems fair to me.

Enforcing immigration law is a power delegated to the Feds in the Constitution.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Do we think Homan knows which states have the highest reliance on federal dollars?

Such a petty, small person.

Yet about to take over one of the most important roles in the US government and you are posting on DCUM.

a

Haha. He's probably at Mar a Lago celebrating how rich he will get off you rubes.

[Anonymous]

Deporting people won't help the crime around me at all. The crime here is caused by American kids ages 11-13.

Are they going to deport these pre-teens? If not, their ideas aren't going to help anything.

[Anonymous]

Homan is funny. California supports many of the red states. So, good luck with your approach, Homan.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Seems perfectly reasonable.

It’s not just reasonable, it’s constitutional. States are not required to enforce Federal laws but they are also not required to receive Federal funds.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Deporting people won't help the crime around me at all. The crime here is caused by American kids ages 11-13.

Are they going to deport these pre-teens? If not, their ideas aren't going to help anything.

Crime is only caused by certain kids. Locking the predictable troublemakers up would improve life immensely, especially for the poor. Dems hate that idea.

[Anonymous]

Good. They broke the law to sneak in here and people shouldn't be standing in the way of the law.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:https://thehill.com/homenews/administration/5008059-trump-border-czar-threatens-funding/amp/

President-elect Trump’s pick for “border czar,” Tom Homan, on Sunday threatened funding for states that refuse to cooperate in the federal government’s deportation plans.

Fox News’s Mark Levin, in an interview with Homan aired Sunday, said the border czar will have “a very, very powerful weapon that the Democrats, when they’re in power, use against Republican administrations, state and local, all the time: federal funding.”


“If you have a governor who says, ‘I’m not gonna cooperate. … I’m gonna block you,’ well, then, federal funds should be slashed to that state, and I mean hugely so, so the people of that state understand that the governor is the responsible party, that the mayor’s the responsible party,” Levin added.

Homan agreed with Levin, saying “that’s going to happen, I guarantee you,” adding that the president-elect “will do that.”

Homan said Sunday that Democrats needed to put aside their feelings about Trump and cooperate.

“I’ll say this: President Trump has made it clear, we’re going to prioritize public safety threats and national security threats right out of the gate [because] they pose the most danger to this country. What governor or mayor doesn’t want public safety threats and national security threats out of their neighborhoods, out of their communities?” Homan said Sunday.

“That’s their number one responsibility. So you can hate Trump all you want, but you gotta love your community more than you hate President Trump,” he added.

That’s what I can’t understand. Why don’t these governors want dangerous criminals out of their states/communities? It doesn’t make sense from a public safety standpoint at all.

Trumps entire cabinet speaks as if they need to make up for having the smallest dicks on the planet.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Seems perfectly reasonable.

It’s not just reasonable, it’s constitutional. States are not required to enforce Federal laws but they are also not required to receive Federal funds.

Da, Comrade!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:https://thehill.com/homenews/administration/5008059-trump-border-czar-threatens-funding/amp/

President-elect Trump’s pick for “border czar,” Tom Homan, on Sunday threatened funding for states that refuse to cooperate in the federal government’s deportation plans.

Fox News’s Mark Levin, in an interview with Homan aired Sunday, said the border czar will have “a very, very powerful weapon that the Democrats, when they’re in power, use against Republican administrations, state and local, all the time: federal funding.”


“If you have a governor who says, ‘I’m not gonna cooperate. … I’m gonna block you,’ well, then, federal funds should be slashed to that state, and I mean hugely so, so the people of that state understand that the governor is the responsible party, that the mayor’s the responsible party,” Levin added.

Homan agreed with Levin, saying “that’s going to happen, I guarantee you,” adding that the president-elect “will do that.”

Homan said Sunday that Democrats needed to put aside their feelings about Trump and cooperate.

“I’ll say this: President Trump has made it clear, we’re going to prioritize public safety threats and national security threats right out of the gate [because] they pose the most danger to this country. What governor or mayor doesn’t want public safety threats and national security threats out of their neighborhoods, out of their communities?” Homan said Sunday.

“That’s their number one responsibility. So you can hate Trump all you want, but you gotta love your community more than you hate President Trump,” he added.

That’s what I can’t understand. Why don’t these governors want dangerous criminals out of their states/communities? It doesn’t make sense from a public safety standpoint at all.

Trumps entire cabinet speaks as if they need to make up for having the smallest dicks on the planet.

LOL. Truth.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Seems perfectly reasonable.

It’s not just reasonable, it’s constitutional. States are not required to enforce Federal laws but they are also not required to receive Federal funds.

Given the states in question generally subsidize "low tax red states" I think the residents will be just fine with the trade off.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:https://thehill.com/homenews/administration/5008059-trump-border-czar-threatens-funding/amp/

President-elect Trump’s pick for “border czar,” Tom Homan, on Sunday threatened funding for states that refuse to cooperate in the federal government’s deportation plans.

Fox News’s Mark Levin, in an interview with Homan aired Sunday, said the border czar will have “a very, very powerful weapon that the Democrats, when they’re in power, use against Republican administrations, state and local, all the time: federal funding.”


“If you have a governor who says, ‘I’m not gonna cooperate. … I’m gonna block you,’ well, then, federal funds should be slashed to that state, and I mean hugely so, so the people of that state understand that the governor is the responsible party, that the mayor’s the responsible party,” Levin added.

Homan agreed with Levin, saying “that’s going to happen, I guarantee you,” adding that the president-elect “will do that.”

Homan said Sunday that Democrats needed to put aside their feelings about Trump and cooperate.

“I’ll say this: President Trump has made it clear, we’re going to prioritize public safety threats and national security threats right out of the gate [because] they pose the most danger to this country. What governor or mayor doesn’t want public safety threats and national security threats out of their neighborhoods, out of their communities?” Homan said Sunday.

“That’s their number one responsibility. So you can hate Trump all you want, but you gotta love your community more than you hate President Trump,” he added.

That’s what I can’t understand. Why don’t these governors want dangerous criminals out of their states/communities? It doesn’t make sense from a public safety standpoint at all.

Trumps entire cabinet speaks as if they need to make up for having the smallest dicks on the planet.

You make a valid observation.
They are all certainty compensating for something.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:None of Trump’s nominees understands how little authority a cabinet Secretary has. DHS funds are not his money. It’s all appropriated for specific purposes with specific formulas and rules for distribution and use.

I hope Republicans become just as creative at getting what they want as Democrats. Crush sanctuary cities. You'll follow federal law or get all your funds yanked. This is a tenth amendment issue and immigration is a federal issue. So the Biden administration told usfor years.

I'm a great fan of negative reinforcement, especially for Democrats since they play dirty all the time. Trump is just the guy to do it.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:None of Trump’s nominees understands how little authority a cabinet Secretary has. DHS funds are not his money. It’s all appropriated for specific purposes with specific formulas and rules for distribution and use.

I hope Republicans become just as creative at getting what they want as Democrats. Crush sanctuary cities. You'll follow federal law or get all your funds yanked. This is a tenth amendment issue and immigration is a federal issue. So the Biden administration told usfor years.

I'm a great fan of negative reinforcement, especially for Democrats since they play dirty all the time. Trump is just the guy to do it.

Democrats are the ones who stole elections and staged coups? Do tell!