Jack Smith Requests J6 Charges Be Dropped

[Anonymous]

A GW Law professor called this election the biggest jury verdict ever. He’s being legally correct while being relatable.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:As someone working for Congress that day, I am infinitely sad. The Republicans in charge should have impeached him. They are spineless self-serving fools. I am also disgusted by the Americans who voted for him.

We were 10 Senate votes shy of conviction and then he couldn't have run again. Cowards, every one of the 43 Senators who voted not guilty but especially the ones who had spoken openly of what Trump did wrong on J6 -- McConnell, Graham, etc. I hope they are forever remembered for that one vote.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:As someone working for Congress that day, I am infinitely sad. The Republicans in charge should have impeached him. They are spineless self-serving fools. I am also disgusted by the Americans who voted for him.

If it helps I expect that there are at least a few Republican Senators who regret not convicting him and barring him from office when they had the chance.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:This is Biden and Garland’s fault. A special counsel should have been appointed with in days of Biden assuming office.

They were investigating January 6 as soon as the top DOJ appointees were confirmed. They just started at the bottom like all investigations and ran out of time because Trump stalled and appealed everything.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Time to release the IG J6 report, completed in September.

I think Jack Smith will release a report before the inauguration.

[Anonymous]

Not a prosecutor, but am positive Jack Smith has tied this up as well as can be done.

While MAGA cheers Trump’s disdain for the rule of law and the civilized norms, it is a tragedy for our country that Trump was not held accountable for his treason.

Still. Karma’s a relaxing thought.

[Anonymous]

Jack smith should prepare to be bankrupted defending himself

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Jack smith should prepare to be bankrupted defending himself

Nah. He can just run for president and then it would be political interference and lawfare to prosecute him.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/other/jack-smith-files-to-drop-jan-6-charges-against-donald-trump/ar-AA1uJuxx?ocid=BingNewsSerp

So much for muh J6. Womp womp.

What point are you trying to make? Did you struggle to spell 'my'?

NP... The point is obvious. If the case was really that important and backed by solid and provable evidence than it should not have been dropped. You know that rule of law thing...

It's a very serious and consequential case, but Trumps attorneys were able to deploy legal tactics to delay and delay and delay and run the clock out and now Trump has control of DOJ which he will make sure drops and buries the case. That's what happened, not your goofy town J6 denials.

Nothing serious or consequential about it, that's the point and why it was dropped. No little fantasy that you can dream up can change that. You people are miserable.

J6 is Trump's legacy. That's how he'll be remembered.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The special counsel filed a motion to dismiss Donald Trump’s election-obstruction case without prejudice, which means the case could be revived in the future.

Trump cannot stop time. 2029 will be here soon.

If his plaque ridden arteries, enlarged heart, and dementia don't get him first

Yep, his lawyers can't abuse the court system to hold that particular judgment off.

[Anonymous]

Damnit! There’s no justice!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/other/jack-smith-files-to-drop-jan-6-charges-against-donald-trump/ar-AA1uJuxx?ocid=BingNewsSerp

So much for muh J6. Womp womp.

What point are you trying to make? Did you struggle to spell 'my'?

NP... The point is obvious. If the case was really that important and backed by solid and provable evidence than it should not have been dropped. You know that rule of law thing...

It's a very serious and consequential case, but Trumps attorneys were able to deploy legal tactics to delay and delay and delay and run the clock out and now Trump has control of DOJ which he will make sure drops and buries the case. That's what happened, not your goofy town J6 denials.

Nothing serious or consequential about it, that's the point and why it was dropped. No little fantasy that you can dream up can change that. You people are miserable.

J6 is Trump's legacy. That's how he'll be remembered.

+1

He did some good things in his first term, in and amongst the zaniness. But J6 obliterates all of that And obliterates every thing he will do in his second term, good, zany, or bad.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/other/jack-smith-files-to-drop-jan-6-charges-against-donald-trump/ar-AA1uJuxx?ocid=BingNewsSerp

So much for muh J6. Womp womp.

What point are you trying to make? Did you struggle to spell 'my'?

NP... The point is obvious. If the case was really that important and backed by solid and provable evidence than it should not have been dropped. You know that rule of law thing...

It's a very serious and consequential case, but Trumps attorneys were able to deploy legal tactics to delay and delay and delay and run the clock out and now Trump has control of DOJ which he will make sure drops and buries the case. That's what happened, not your goofy town J6 denials.

Nothing serious or consequential about it, that's the point and why it was dropped. No little fantasy that you can dream up can change that. You people are miserable.

OP ironically made the opposite point. The day was so consequential, it received its forever label "J6" or "January 6th".

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:The special counsel filed a motion to dismiss Donald Trump’s election-obstruction case without prejudice, which means the case could be revived in the future.

Trump cannot stop time. 2029 will be here soon.

+1 exactly. This is a strategic move.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:A GW Law professor called this election the biggest jury verdict ever. He’s being legally correct while being relatable.

Not really. Prospective jurors can be dismissed for any number of reasons, like being too low IQ to understand a case, by either side.

There is nothing preventing low IQ people from voting.