Why bring up these two schools? Not like they’re peers. |
What is large to you? |
UVA will take the lead, as usual. The Ivies have already done it. |
They can't go test optional without sacrificing their medians |
| list of schools which have already dropped TO. https://horizoneducation.com/blog/colleges-dropping-reinstating-act-sat-requirements |
| test required^ |
Columbia, Princeton, UPenn, Duke, Rice, Chicago, Vanderbilt are all schools that are much better than UVA that haven't gone TR. |
Also... UVA hasn't gone test required (!!!) |
Not true with the elite public and privates. Not at all. UVA receives almost 60,000 apps a year. It's SCHEV median is a 4.4, 34 ACT and a 1470.That's not going to change because the demand for an elite public education at $160k a year compared to private at $400k (USC just passed $96k a year) is only going to increase the interest in top publics. It's a simple analysis of supply and demand. All of the elite publics are seeing this, especially during covid when many families lost income and had to rethink the cost of higher ed. The next step would be for UVA/the Commknwealth to respond to taxpayers and reduce OOS and international from 26% to less than 8% as Cal, Texas, and N Carolina have done, but so far bills to do exactly that have never made it out of committee |
Grammatical errors abound, UVA's medians would drop, no reduction of OOs will come with the cliff |
I’m not sure about the rest of the list, but Princeton hasn’t announced if they will be test required for current juniors either. |
Because it's economically infeasible. UVA has been one-third OOS since I went there as an OOS student the early 90s (and UNC was less than 20% OOS back then, too). It was a financial play then, and state funding has only gotten worse in the interim. And none of the "elite publics" has gone test-required. |
+1 |
+1 Never going to happen |
Not that high. Ivies take way more not TO. UVa's test % is exactly the same as William and Mary's. |