Is Baltimore Armour applying to ECNL this year?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:DCSC should've stuck with good old NCSL.

Youngest DCSC boys and girls doing pretty good for 1st year in a new league.

The 2012 girls are in 8th out of 12. No other age group has won a single game.

And 2012 boys in 5th out of 13. So youngest doing fine.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Notice how if a club has GA and they're looking for a league to play in on the boys side that ECNL only let's the boys play in ECRL. Also ECNL doesn't let the girls into ECNL. Most likely ECNL wants the club to go ECRL on the girls side and drop GA and go ECRL as well. The club is probably trying to get into MLS Next for boys and will be fine with GA.

It's ridiculous that clubs have to play these type of games just to get into leagues.

Baltimore Celtic has boys playing ECNL and girls playing GA. I think they handle the genders independently. The ECNL has certain standards they expect clubs to meet to join the NL. If they don't meet them all then they move into RL only initially.

RL only clubs is a joke and a money grab. The club vs. club format doesn't make much sense once you're down to the B league. USYS format makes a lot more sense.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Notice how if a club has GA and they're looking for a league to play in on the boys side that ECNL only let's the boys play in ECRL. Also ECNL doesn't let the girls into ECNL. Most likely ECNL wants the club to go ECRL on the girls side and drop GA and go ECRL as well. The club is probably trying to get into MLS Next for boys and will be fine with GA.

It's ridiculous that clubs have to play these type of games just to get into leagues.

Baltimore Celtic has boys playing ECNL and girls playing GA. I think they handle the genders independently. The ECNL has certain standards they expect clubs to meet to join the NL. If they don't meet them all then they move into RL only initially.

RL only clubs is a joke and a money grab. The club vs. club format doesn't make much sense once you're down to the B league. USYS format makes a lot more sense.

Did the get GA then boys ECNL?

Or did they have boys ECNL and then get GA?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Notice how if a club has GA and they're looking for a league to play in on the boys side that ECNL only let's the boys play in ECRL. Also ECNL doesn't let the girls into ECNL. Most likely ECNL wants the club to go ECRL on the girls side and drop GA and go ECRL as well. The club is probably trying to get into MLS Next for boys and will be fine with GA.

It's ridiculous that clubs have to play these type of games just to get into leagues.

Baltimore Celtic has boys playing ECNL and girls playing GA. I think they handle the genders independently. The ECNL has certain standards they expect clubs to meet to join the NL. If they don't meet them all then they move into RL only initially.

RL only clubs is a joke and a money grab. The club vs. club format doesn't make much sense once you're down to the B league. USYS format makes a lot more sense.[/quote]

Agree with this totally.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Notice how if a club has GA and they're looking for a league to play in on the boys side that ECNL only let's the boys play in ECRL. Also ECNL doesn't let the girls into ECNL. Most likely ECNL wants the club to go ECRL on the girls side and drop GA and go ECRL as well. The club is probably trying to get into MLS Next for boys and will be fine with GA.

It's ridiculous that clubs have to play these type of games just to get into leagues.

Baltimore Celtic has boys playing ECNL and girls playing GA. I think they handle the genders independently. The ECNL has certain standards they expect clubs to meet to join the NL. If they don't meet them all then they move into RL only initially.

RL only clubs is a joke and a money grab. The club vs. club format doesn't make much sense once you're down to the B league. USYS format makes a lot more sense.

Agree with this totally, especially for clubs who have a few super strong teams and the rest more mediocre.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Notice how if a club has GA and they're looking for a league to play in on the boys side that ECNL only let's the boys play in ECRL. Also ECNL doesn't let the girls into ECNL. Most likely ECNL wants the club to go ECRL on the girls side and drop GA and go ECRL as well. The club is probably trying to get into MLS Next for boys and will be fine with GA.

It's ridiculous that clubs have to play these type of games just to get into leagues.

Baltimore Celtic has boys playing ECNL and girls playing GA. I think they handle the genders independently. The ECNL has certain standards they expect clubs to meet to join the NL. If they don't meet them all then they move into RL only initially.

RL only clubs is a joke and a money grab. The club vs. club format doesn't make much sense once you're down to the B league. USYS format makes a lot more sense.

Agree with this totally, especially for clubs who have a few super strong teams and the rest more mediocre.
Did the get GA then boys ECNL?

Or did they have boys ECNL and then get GA?