Troll elsewhere |
Not the person you're quoting, but I'm guessing the full ride at George Mason was unexpected. Perhaps the decision would have been different if the choice was between full pay at Ivy vs. full pay at GM. This makes sense to me. |
See? This is how ignorant and narrow-minded you are. |
OP here. A safety a school where the student has an 80%+ chance. A match is 50-50. Does anyone have an 80%+ of being admitted to computer science at Maryland? |
NP-It's not inconceivable |
Pp. Yes, exactly. |
The acceptances are believable. The issue is the PPs mis-defining what is a safety. Those schools are not safeties for anyone, let alone for CS. |
The main thing I'd want to know is the number and type of schools applied to.
If you applied to one safety and 19 lottery schools and ended up at the safety, that's not unexpected. Your strategy was flawed. If you applied to three safeties, six targets, and four reaches, and ended up at a safety... that's more interesting because your strategy wasn't obviously bad (though perhaps you misjudged the targets). |
I think people aren't understanding true safeties. It sounds like OP was looking for kids who applied to all T25 and then attending more like a 80-100. |
I can see as a match/likely if stats are 75%+ percentile, but NOT a safety. |
DP: They may not be trolling. UVA in state, Mich, GTech are all likelies (prep school defines that as 75-95% chance) for the top few stem kids in each class our of 170 students. Almost all end up choosing ivy/+ for Engineering/CS (The last 3 super stars went to Stanford, Penn Viper, MIT) but these very top kids almost always get in all 3 of the likely ones. We get detailed scoir reports and it is easy to figure out who is who since you can select by years. |
UVA and UMich aren't safeties for even normal smart kids. |
Yes.
Several male CS, engineering or business kids from our private. Class of 2024. Should have had a better list of schools tbh. |
And that are attending schools like Fordham; SMU; UC-Boulder and Wisconsin. Full pay. 4.0uw; 35 ACT; national recognition; musical talent; ranked athletes. |
Again, it is not the fact that they were accepted. It is the misunderstanding of what is meant by "safety." |