Am I the only one who thinks that the Tea Party guidlines for DC are actually accurate?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The red part of the map is the part the writer of the "guide" deemed safe. Glad they didn't come to my part of DC-- Glover Park-- because if they did I'd bust a cap in their ass!

MLK believed in non violence. You aren't one to follow his lead, are you?

You aren't one to understand sarcasm, are you?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If you were new to DC and not from an area with a lot of mass transit, and one that was pretty homogeneous I think that the guidelines would really help. It's just that it's easy to make fun of the Tea Party folks but it all really makes sense.

No.

Really? You'd feel completely comfortable wondering around Capitol Heights metro station after hours? There were three fatalities near the station just last month.

This is just crap rhetoric, PP has probably never strayed from her wonder-bread neighborhood.

Sorry, I live in SE and actually follow the news and crime stats. Rhetoric? No, FACT. Why don't you take a look at this and get back to me?

http://dcist.com/2010/07/amid_all_hands_on_deck_another_fata.php

[Anonymous]

The tea party guidelines were needlessly, ridiculously broad.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The red part of the map is the part the writer of the "guide" deemed safe. Glad they didn't come to my part of DC-- Glover Park-- because if they did I'd bust a cap in their ass!

MLK believed in non violence. You aren't one to follow his lead, are you?

You aren't one to understand sarcasm, are you?

I didn't know that threatening violent behavior against another human being was considered sarcasm.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The red part of the map is the part the writer of the "guide" deemed safe. Glad they didn't come to my part of DC-- Glover Park-- because if they did I'd bust a cap in their ass!

MLK believed in non violence. You aren't one to follow his lead, are you?

You aren't one to understand sarcasm, are you?

I didn't know that threatening violent behavior against another human being was considered sarcasm.

Oh, please. Give it a rest. If you knew anything about Glover Park you would have recognized this as sarcasm in the first place.

Signed, Someone who'd like to give your dumb ass a swift kick (kidding, kidding...)

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The red part of the map is the part the writer of the "guide" deemed safe. Glad they didn't come to my part of DC-- Glover Park-- because if they did I'd bust a cap in their ass!

MLK believed in non violence. You aren't one to follow his lead, are you?

You aren't one to understand sarcasm, are you?

I didn't know that threatening violent behavior against another human being was considered sarcasm.

Oh, please. Give it a rest. If you knew anything about Glover Park you would have recognized this as sarcasm in the first place.

Signed, Someone who'd like to give your dumb ass a swift kick (kidding, kidding...)

You are pathetic.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The red part of the map is the part the writer of the "guide" deemed safe. Glad they didn't come to my part of DC-- Glover Park-- because if they did I'd bust a cap in their ass!

MLK believed in non violence. You aren't one to follow his lead, are you?

You aren't one to understand sarcasm, are you?

I didn't know that threatening violent behavior against another human being was considered sarcasm.

Oh, please. Give it a rest. If you knew anything about Glover Park you would have recognized this as sarcasm in the first place.

Signed, Someone who'd like to give your dumb ass a swift kick (kidding, kidding...)

You are pathetic.

And you are ridiculous. Why would you even take this exchange seriously? Get a clue.