Imagine if Kamala Harris had 5 kids by 3 partners like Trump...

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I’m a female and a corporate executive and a mom. I don’t like Vance’s reference to childless cat ladies because it’s insensitive to people who have wanted to have kids and cannot.

But I think that what Vance is trying to say is that Kamala doesn’t reflect the American population because she’s not family oriented and is a career politician living off the government’s paychecks. And think he’s saying that someone who doesn’t reflect our values as an American people.

That's some projection there. Vance was in the military and received paychecks paid for by taxpayers. Same for when he was in the Senate. Now, he wants to be VP and get paid even more from the taxpayers.

Harris was a DA and AG. Should we not have those?

Don’t try and apply logic to troll PP’s argument…it’s nonsense. Trying to paint an AG and VP as a welfare queen is the best that MAGAs can come up with without using a hard R.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I’m a female and a corporate executive and a mom. I don’t like Vance’s reference to childless cat ladies because it’s insensitive to people who have wanted to have kids and cannot.

But I think that what Vance is trying to say is that Kamala doesn’t reflect the American population because she’s not family oriented and is a career politician living off the government’s paychecks. And think he’s saying that someone who doesn’t reflect our values as an American people.

That's some projection there. Vance was in the military and received paychecks paid for by taxpayers. Same for when he was in the Senate. Now, he wants to be VP and get paid even more from the taxpayers.

Harris was a DA and AG. Should we not have those?

Don’t try and apply logic to troll PP’s argument…it’s nonsense. Trying to paint an AG and VP as a welfare queen is the best that MAGAs can come up with without using a hard R.

Definitely resurrecting the welfare queen label.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I’m a female and a corporate executive and a mom. I don’t like Vance’s reference to childless cat ladies because it’s insensitive to people who have wanted to have kids and cannot.

But I think that what Vance is trying to say is that Kamala doesn’t reflect the American population because she’s not family oriented and is a career politician living off the government’s paychecks. And think he’s saying that someone who doesn’t reflect our values as an American people.

That's some projection there. Vance was in the military and received paychecks paid for by taxpayers. Same for when he was in the Senate. Now, he wants to be VP and get paid even more from the taxpayers.

Harris was a DA and AG. Should we not have those?

Don’t try and apply logic to troll PP’s argument…it’s nonsense. Trying to paint an AG and VP as a welfare queen is the best that MAGAs can come up with without using a hard R.

Definitely resurrecting the welfare queen label.

That's a tired trope. First, "DEI hire", then "release the birth certificate", etc. Just trying whatever sticks, MAGAs. So tired and so obvious and weird.

[Anonymous]

It wouldn’t matter.

Sarah Palin had a lot of children and when she was running with John McCain, no mainstream news outlets criticized her for her family choices. I recall passing criticism for having ‘so many kids’ in an overpopulated world, but that wasn’t a big deal.

The outrage over Vance’s comments from three years ago are reflective of his point. People without children are so emotionally fragile. Grow a set and grow up. Parents listen to criticism far worse than Vance’s continually.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:It wouldn’t matter.

Sarah Palin had a lot of children and when she was running with John McCain, no mainstream news outlets criticized her for her family choices. I recall passing criticism for having ‘so many kids’ in an overpopulated world, but that wasn’t a big deal.

The outrage over Vance’s comments from three years ago are reflective of his point. People without children are so emotionally fragile. Grow a set and grow up. Parents listen to criticism far worse than Vance’s continually.

It’s offensive even to those of us who are parents.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I’m a female and a corporate executive and a mom. I don’t like Vance’s reference to childless cat ladies because it’s insensitive to people who have wanted to have kids and cannot.

But I think that what Vance is trying to say is that Kamala doesn’t reflect the American population because she’s not family oriented and is a career politician living off the government’s paychecks. And think he’s saying that someone who doesn’t reflect our values as an American people.

First of all, I think your post is FOS. But how do you know that Kamala never wanted her own biological children, not that it should matter one way or the other. And your post along with JD Vance is a big F-U to stepparents all over America. Hello, policewomen, firefighter women, teachers, government scientist did you know that you are welfare queens living off government checks and thus not reflective of the values of American people. Condoleeza Rice, Oprah Winfrey, Janet Reno, Gloria Steinem, Betty White and more do not reflect the values of America because they didn't squirt out a mini-me. Got It

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:It wouldn’t matter.

Sarah Palin had a lot of children and when she was running with John McCain, no mainstream news outlets criticized her for her family choices. I recall passing criticism for having ‘so many kids’ in an overpopulated world, but that wasn’t a big deal.

The outrage over Vance’s comments from three years ago are reflective of his point. People without children are so emotionally fragile. Grow a set and grow up. Parents listen to criticism far worse than Vance’s continually.

It's disgusting and offensive.

signed, Mom/Mother/Mommy

[Anonymous]

You know if a black woman had 5 kids by 3 husbands it would definitely be a GOP talking point.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It wouldn’t matter.

Sarah Palin had a lot of children and when she was running with John McCain, no mainstream news outlets criticized her for her family choices. I recall passing criticism for having ‘so many kids’ in an overpopulated world, but that wasn’t a big deal.

The outrage over Vance’s comments from three years ago are reflective of his point. People without children are so emotionally fragile. Grow a set and grow up. Parents listen to criticism far worse than Vance’s continually.

It's disgusting and offensive.

signed, Mom/Mother/Mommy

+1 mom of two

women who respect themselves in general find that statement offensive. The fact that Vance said this is something out of The Handmaid's Tale in Gilead. That's what Project 2025 sounds like, and that's what MAGA seem to support. Every woman should be concerned about Vance's views.