They need to build something even more hideous next door like this:
|
| If you have restrictive setbacks, lot coverage, and height limits then people will find ways to maximize their SF. |
| Horrible. |
| The old house was adorable, well built & classic. The new things are truly atrocious. I feel for the neighbors |
|
For real. Sometimes this forum would make Hitler blush |
Kimberly has entered the chat. She had a listing on the other side of the park in 20011 zip code and listed a home for an inflated price. I’m so glad it sold for $80k less. She was not approachable and has a stank looking face like she can’t be touched in the RE game. Greedy yes. |
| The older house may have needed too much work for the price. It looks like they did that to build two houses on one lot. Ulgy. |
Ha no love.for real estate agents here, trust me. I am just confused as to how the PP can know what actually happened in the transaction. |
Progress? They are ugly and don’t go with the neighborhood. Also they look cheap. I feel for the neighbors. I live on a double lot and my spouse and I discussed not selling to developers. |
Is it a designated historical zone or have development guidelines, either municipal or HOA? If not, not your problem. |
+1. This is plain old fashioned american ugly. |
|
What is this bulky box in the island? A display cabinet? Or some sort of appliance?
|
|
No one has ever been this worked up about a real estate agent. |