Oh FFS. |
Do ATS kids perform better in MS and HS? Are they the ones being accepted to top colleges while their peers who went to neighborhood elementaries are getting into lesser universities?
I’m not sure why all of this matters, or that any of these schools are very good at all. Sure, they may be at the top of the list for public schools in VA, but that’s not that prestigious of an award. The best slice of government cheese is still… government cheese. |
It's also Velveeta; same recipe. "American Cheese" is a USDA thing. |
Or, just educate students in all schools the way they educate students ATS. |
BS. "To be successful" as in top statistics for the school as a whole? Maybe. But to be successful in teaching kids generally? No. Those who "buy-in" are successful wherever they are in whatever program they're in and those who don't "buy-in" aren't 'successful' wherever they are in whatever program they're in. |
If the instructional model requires parents, it shouldn't be a specified unique educational model. All "instructional models" benefit with parental support. So, what part of the instructional model requires parental buy-in? Completing homework? or adhering to the dress code? Same would apply to the success of any school. |
The point went over your head. Enjoy your top-scoring slice of Velveeta. |
LOL |
no it didn't. I was messing with you. It's Friday! |
Kinda seems like you didn’t get it. |
High behavioral standards require parent buy-in. After working in a few APS schools I no longer underestimate how many parents not only don’t care about their child’s behavior but will actively undermine your attempts to help. It only takes a few kids to sow chaos. |
NP. The point is that kids at option schools often perform better than those at neighborhood schools with similar demographics largely because they have parents involved & proactive enough to seek out, learn about, and apply for the option school in the first place. This isn’t a secret. |
I understand the point. I've heard it for years and years. And I'm tired of it. Non-option schools can be quite successful, and many in APS are. It's the definition of "success" that seems to be at issue, if having the top scores is the criteria. In any system, one school is going to have the highest scores. Just because a school has lower stats does not mean it is not successful. All ATS does is weed out the more challenging children so that they don't have the demands and challenges of a Barcroft or a Randolp or a Drew. Those students aren't successful because their parents "sought out" and "learned about" and applied for it. It just happens that everyone there has done that. But many students whose parents don't seek to learn about options are equally successful in their neighborhood schools. It's just that you people believe those neighborhood schools aren't as successful as ATS because of all the students (many of who have very involved parents, btw) don't achieve at the same level and therefore drag the overall stats for the school down. I challenge the ATS teachers to teach at Barcroft or Carlin Springs or Randolph and see how it compares - not because parents sought out ATS; but because those parents fled from those schools and as a group do not pose the same challenges in the same proportions. I believe ATS approach can be successful at any neighborhood school. That doesn't mean every student is going to be valedictorian. |
No, they perform better because ATS instructional standards and expectations of these students are higher. Hold the students of the same demographics at other schools to the same standards and methods, and I guarantee you will see improved school performance overall. Some students will just never be the top performers for various reasons; but I don't think we need, nor should expect, every student to be the same. |
How does ATS compare to Sidwell/GDS/Beauvoir/Potomac/Maret?
You’re kidding yourselves if you think you’ve got some special school. So it’s better than all of the S Arlington elementaries… So what? |