Stop trying to paint it as OP being 'against the community'. It has nothing to do with the community and everything to do with shutting down poorly disguised attempts by OP's ILs to draw them in. Had the ILs been less persistent, perhaps OP and her family might feel comfortable going to the occassional church dinner but they aren't at that point now and might not ever get to that point. Nothing wrong with that. |
Genuinely curious: Why does it matter what beliefs OP's family holds and what beliefs her ILs hold? Why isn't it enough their beliefs are different and OP's family wants to keep religion out of their relationship? |
+1 as someone who has dealt with this as well. The usual politeness and softer approach will not work. In the ILs minds, they are making excuses- thinking “oh they are just busy, or a bit lazy, haven’t found a church home yet and need a nudge”. Or- they are holding out hope that their son agrees with them and is trying to “bring his spouse around” as that is easier for them to accept. DH needs to tell them clearly that there is NO chance whatsoever of a baptism- no matter what ILs do- and that the two of you are in agreement. He also needs to tell them that when the topic is brought up again, you will need to leave (or hang up the phone). My guess is your DH has not done the above- is a nice guy who doesn’t want to hurt his parents’ feelings and is just hoping they will eventually give up and the problem will go away. This tends to be the way a lot of men handle problems with their parents IME. It isn’t always the worst strategy for other topics TBH but with religion he is going to have to man up and really draw a line….otherwise they will just keep pushing and end up causing a real rift/estrangement. |
Honestly this is what I would think too. From their point of view—they are “risking their relationship with you” because it is worth the risk of it means that you will be saved through knowing Jesus Christ as your savior. Even if YOU don’t believe this, it’s important for you to understand WHY the only kind and compassionate choice *from their perspective* is to NOT leave it alone. Sure—from a worldly view, they absolutely should just live and let live. And to a non-believer that makes perfect sense bc who cares what religion you are! But the point is, they DO care because they care about YOU! And to shrug and just let it go means (to them) that they need to just keep their mouths shut while you condemn yourselves and their grandchildren to an eternity of separation from God. The point of my post is not to persuade you to accept Christ (because I don’t think that a random post on a message board will do that anyway)—-but rather to persuade you to at least consider the purity of their motives and have compassion for their predicament. Rationally, given their worldview, wouldn’t you agree that if they are believers who just “let it go”—-that would make them incredibly heartless and selfish??? Are they supposed to pretend it doesn’t matter to them or that they are indifferent about where you spend eternity? That would make your lives easier and more cordial while you are all together, and I get that….but it wouldn’t make them very loving for them to prioritize pleasantries and not offending you over your eternal salvation. (Again—this assumes that the motivation comes from a sincerely held belief that without Christ, your souls will perish. That’s a lot to ask a parent/grandparent to just shrug off) Just a thought. |
Stupid, ignorant love don't better than hate. Cut them out if they don't stop abusing you. |
If my in-laws were Bible-believing Christians who believed that my husband and children and I were all going to spend eternity in hell unless we found Jesus, then I think I would actually be more offended if they were easily persuaded to stop trying to make sure that didn’t happen.
|
Np but the bolded is incredibly offensive and heartless (and if I'm being truly honest quite laughable) to hold on to as a sincere belief, but if you must, you should always keep these kinds of dogmatic opinions to yourself and not push it on to others, only to be 'hurt' when rejected. Just a thought. |
They're supposed to have a tiny speck of common sense and realize that constantly hassling their son and DIL and violating their boundaries isn't going to save them. |
Uh no. Honoring their childs request to STFU would likely be greatly appreciated and welcomed with open arms. Unlike whatever garbage you are spewing. |
Back in elementary school, one of my DD's classmates gave her a card that essentially said she loved her, was concerned that her soul was going to burn for all eternity, didn't want that to happen, so could she just be saved by Jesus already (or some such). The fact that this came from a child's caring and concern did not make it any less than grossly inappropriate (we are atheists, but culturally of a non-Christian religion). Same here. Motivations matter only a little. After they have been told that they're overstepping, they need to stop. Or there can be consequences. |
Would you say the same thing about a workplace? Would you continually harass co-workers to find salvation? Or would you realize that it is wildly inappropriate? Now you have someone actively telling you to stop, but you wont? Because you "care" so much about them, but not what they want or ask? |
Before a few years ago, I would have had a very different answer. I have close personal experience with this situation, and I will never again be so naive as to what harm can come from some sects of christianity
I had no idea that being "friends" with a fundamentalist/evangelical, whose beliefs "I" respected just fine, would not be respecting mine. Ever. They just can't. There are now long term consequences in my family due to their intrusion of their beliefs into my children when they would be hanging out at her house. When they were at my house, there was no mention of religion, but come to find out years later, they had "saved" 2 of my children with fear of hell. One of my children cannot be talked out of the fact that she was told she has a "special" place in hell waiting for her since she was so strong willed...which according to them is one of the worst things you can be because you aren't obeying their lord or something . I could go on, but I won't bore you. But know that it isn't as simple as respecting others' beliefs sometimes. Some people have zero desire to do that and I would never again associate with anyone that even resembled this belief system. I am still shocked at some of the things I've learned about them that they kept quite hidden for a long time. |
The point is not to argue whether or not you AGREE with their belief. (Clearly you don’t and that’s okay. It’s understandably much easier for the IL’s to respect that you—a completely stranger—does not want to hear their view.) The point is that in order to expect the in-laws to not to “push” their dogmatic opinions on others—you’d have to expect them to be the very thing you are accusing them of being: heartless They aren’t “hurt” that their son and family are rejecting them. They are worried and concerned that they are rejecting the gift of eternal salvation. So on the small chance that not keeping quiet results in one of their family members coming to Christ, they are willing to risk of being “offensive” in case it turns out they are right about that while “laughable” and “offensive” salvation thing. |
Would I? No. Would I understand if someone else felt convicted to share the Gospel because they earnestly thought they had a higher obligation to fellow man than societal standards of MYOB, and in defiance of workplace policies and laws that prevent this? Yeah—I could intellectually understand that some people rationalize that the call to be “fishers of men” require placing a higher value on salvation than on observing what is comfortable for others. Let me be clear. I’m not condoning the In-laws (misguided) choice OR the fictitious hypothetical overzealous co-worker in your scenario. (And in the latter case, the co-worker who defies the workplace policy should and probably does lose his/her job over it.) What I’m doing is attempting to make a case for compassionate analysis of their perspective. Why would in-laws do this if they know it risks alienating their children and grandchildren??? Likely the answer isn’t just “because they’re obnoxious and selfish!” Likely it’s because something more is driving them to share anyway—despite their children saying “we don’t wanna hear it!!” That doesn’t have to mean that I think it’s the right thing to do—or that it IS the right thing to do. But if THEY think that it is their responsibility to do this thing in order to save me from peril, I’m going to look at their actions with a bit more compassion than annoyance. |
+1 exactly. This goes for most things. If my in laws thought touching a frog and spinning around three times before going to bed every night was what was going to save my soul, how could I expect them not to try to convince me to do this? If they didn’t try, that would mean they either didn’t really believe that or they didn’t care what happened to me. |