| If you have an anorexic girl 0.5 carats will work, small girl 1 carat, plump 1.5, heifer 2.0, whale 2.5, elephant 3 |
|
I think average size has been getting bigger because diamonds are so much cheaper now.
I like the look of 1.5 round on my finger (size 4). Over 2ct is too big for me and starts to look a bit like costume jewelry |
| At least 2 carat. |
|
1 or 2 carats but it’s kind of cultural. You don’t see above 1 in a lot of cultures.
Something with a low profile is ideal, like an East/West emerald cut diamond. But this cut is not as sparkly as the round. I find very high-set stones ridiculous and impractical. And the band shouldn’t be too thin either (fortunately that minimalist trend seems to be dead). |
You’re not wrong but this is not really relevant. OP is not asking about status, but rather, about a practical design for daily use… |
| I have a 5.5 ct oval and love it. I started with a 3.8 radiant cut though, which I still wear on some occasions. |
This. Haha. |
| My .78 carat high quality diamond in a beautiful setting was more than enough for 20 years. I now have a 1.5 carat diamond. It is gorgeous but I think it may almost be too big. I think 1 carat would be perfect. |
| I love my .75ct stone. I wear it all the time. |
|
Round I prefer at 1.5. Emerald or cushion cut 2. Princess 2-2.25. This would be for everyday wear.
I like jewelry and buy lab so I like to have a few e-ring style rings I can wear depending on my mood. |
| 2 to 3 ct IMO is perfect |
| This thread is like a bunch of men bragging on phallus size, but the female version. |
|
1.5 is perfect.
2ct is lovely, but yeah, it bangs around more. I had a 1ct and it was just too small and I didn't like the proportions of it as much as my 1.5ct. I have size 5 fingers. |
+2. Set in platinum. Feels elegant but not flashy or showy. |
I don’t. I think 2x is perfect but it really depends on the person and their fingers. |