Meeting this evening with admin and principals unions

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:When was MCPS planning on telling families that she was on leave?!? I receive tons of garbage comms from MCPS, but not that, for some reason.

If she's dealing with a private matter, she has my sympathy... but not announcing it seems fishy.

It won't be in MCPS's "Things to Know" email blast, that's for sure.

Wow! You're late to the party staff was notified last week and it isn't a secret

I'm not staff. I'm a parent and I was not notified of anything.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:When was MCPS planning on telling families that she was on leave?!? I receive tons of garbage comms from MCPS, but not that, for some reason.

If she's dealing with a private matter, she has my sympathy... but not announcing it seems fishy.

It won't be in MCPS's "Things to Know" email blast, that's for sure.

Wow! You're late to the party staff was notified last week and it isn't a secret

I'm not staff. I'm a parent and I was not notified of anything.

The superintendent is on sick leave. There is no need for a press release.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:When was MCPS planning on telling families that she was on leave?!? I receive tons of garbage comms from MCPS, but not that, for some reason.

If she's dealing with a private matter, she has my sympathy... but not announcing it seems fishy.

It won't be in MCPS's "Things to Know" email blast, that's for sure.

Wow! You're late to the party staff was notified last week and it isn't a secret

I'm not staff. I'm a parent and I was not notified of anything.

The superintendent is on sick leave. There is no need for a press release.

Crazy timing though. People are going to suspect the worst based on the MCPS track record. I can't say I blame them.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:When was MCPS planning on telling families that she was on leave?!? I receive tons of garbage comms from MCPS, but not that, for some reason.

If she's dealing with a private matter, she has my sympathy... but not announcing it seems fishy.

It won't be in MCPS's "Things to Know" email blast, that's for sure.

Wow! You're late to the party staff was notified last week and it isn't a secret

I'm not staff. I'm a parent and I was not notified of anything.

The superintendent is on sick leave. There is no need for a press release.

+1. This is so stupid.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:When was MCPS planning on telling families that she was on leave?!? I receive tons of garbage comms from MCPS, but not that, for some reason.

If she's dealing with a private matter, she has my sympathy... but not announcing it seems fishy.

It won't be in MCPS's "Things to Know" email blast, that's for sure.

Wow! You're late to the party staff was notified last week and it isn't a secret

I'm not staff. I'm a parent and I was not notified of anything.

The superintendent is on sick leave. There is no need for a press release.

Crazy timing though. People are going to suspect the worst based on the MCPS track record. I can't say I blame them.

You mean cheer for the worst? Come on, let's be better than this people.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:When was MCPS planning on telling families that she was on leave?!? I receive tons of garbage comms from MCPS, but not that, for some reason.

If she's dealing with a private matter, she has my sympathy... but not announcing it seems fishy.

It won't be in MCPS's "Things to Know" email blast, that's for sure.

Wow! You're late to the party staff was notified last week and it isn't a secret

I'm not staff. I'm a parent and I was not notified of anything.

The superintendent is on sick leave. There is no need for a press release.

Crazy timing though. People are going to suspect the worst based on the MCPS track record. I can't say I blame them.

Well, DCUM gonna DCUM.

[Anonymous]

Yup and mcps is going to mcps all those pesky teachers right in their mcps's

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:When was MCPS planning on telling families that she was on leave?!? I receive tons of garbage comms from MCPS, but not that, for some reason.

If she's dealing with a private matter, she has my sympathy... but not announcing it seems fishy.

It won't be in MCPS's "Things to Know" email blast, that's for sure.

Wow! You're late to the party staff was notified last week and it isn't a secret

I'm not staff. I'm a parent and I was not notified of anything.

The superintendent is on sick leave. There is no need for a press release.

Crazy timing though. People are going to suspect the worst based on the MCPS track record. I can't say I blame them.

You mean cheer for the worst? Come on, let's be better than this people.

And now we see why politicians are they way they are. She’s on sick leave. There is a process in place for what happens or in the least she can name who she wants leading in her temporary absence. It was announced to the people who need to know. A press release wasn’t needed for this.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:When was MCPS planning on telling families that she was on leave?!? I receive tons of garbage comms from MCPS, but not that, for some reason.

If she's dealing with a private matter, she has my sympathy... but not announcing it seems fishy.

It won't be in MCPS's "Things to Know" email blast, that's for sure.

Wow! You're late to the party staff was notified last week and it isn't a secret

I'm not staff. I'm a parent and I was not notified of anything.

The superintendent is on sick leave. There is no need for a press release.

Crazy timing though. People are going to suspect the worst based on the MCPS track record. I can't say I blame them.

You mean cheer for the worst? Come on, let's be better than this people.

I genuinely wish people were better than this but seriously there are a couple die hard posters who have done nothing but cheer for this woman to fail from day 1.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:When was MCPS planning on telling families that she was on leave?!? I receive tons of garbage comms from MCPS, but not that, for some reason.

If she's dealing with a private matter, she has my sympathy... but not announcing it seems fishy.

It won't be in MCPS's "Things to Know" email blast, that's for sure.

Wow! You're late to the party staff was notified last week and it isn't a secret

I'm not staff. I'm a parent and I was not notified of anything.

The superintendent is on sick leave. There is no need for a press release.

Crazy timing though. People are going to suspect the worst based on the MCPS track record. I can't say I blame them.

You mean cheer for the worst? Come on, let's be better than this people.

I genuinely wish people were better than this but seriously there are a couple die hard posters who have done nothing but cheer for this woman to fail from day 1.

It is an anonymous board. Seek counseling for your paranoia.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:When was MCPS planning on telling families that she was on leave?!? I receive tons of garbage comms from MCPS, but not that, for some reason.

If she's dealing with a private matter, she has my sympathy... but not announcing it seems fishy.

It won't be in MCPS's "Things to Know" email blast, that's for sure.

Wow! You're late to the party staff was notified last week and it isn't a secret

I'm not staff. I'm a parent and I was not notified of anything.

The superintendent is on sick leave. There is no need for a press release.

Crazy timing though. People are going to suspect the worst based on the MCPS track record. I can't say I blame them.

You mean cheer for the worst? Come on, let's be better than this people.

And now we see why politicians are they way they are. She’s on sick leave. There is a process in place for what happens or in the least she can name who she wants leading in her temporary absence. It was announced to the people who need to know. A press release wasn’t needed for this.

I mean honestly, if she's on sick leave, there's no need to have an acting superintendent unless it's anticipated that she will be gone for a long time or never.

[Anonymous]

Superintendents don't take sick leave unless they have surgery or they are about to resign or be forced out.

Which is it?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Superintendents don't take sick leave unless they have surgery or they are about to resign or be forced out.

Which is it?

Logic fail.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Superintendents don't take sick leave unless they have surgery or they are about to resign or be forced out.

Which is it?

Logic fail.

Not if you know public schools. Superintendents just don't do this. They work from hospital beds.

We'll see, I guess.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Superintendents don't take sick leave unless they have surgery or they are about to resign or be forced out.

Which is it?

Logic fail.

Not if you know public schools. Superintendents just don't do this. They work from hospital beds.

We'll see, I guess.

She's home and sent a note to staff today to not send emails on weekends and at night. I guess she is struggling for boundaries and she wants us to establish boundaries. It sounds good, but there is never permission to lessen the workload and miss deadlines.