| How many have actual first-hand experience of the relative rigor of more than 1 of these schools schools? I suspect the answer is very few. Even second hand (e.g., kids at 2 of these schools) is going to be through a filter and is probably going to be very dependent on the kid's major and how hard they specifically have to work (rather than the overall population). |
|
Non-lab STEM majors tend to be the easiest in my experience, or at least easiest and least time consuming to my smartest peers.
Math and CS attract bright kids for a number of reasons but some can just cruise through the problem sets and tests. Econ can also be the same way. I know a few picked this major to avoid reading time and please parents (CS too). Unless you a very fast reader and writer, humanities and most social sciences are far from easy. I avoided several of these areas I wish I had taken classes in now because of the time commitment and difficulty. |
I’d add UVA |
| Swarthmore!!! |
Why? I have never heard that. |
It's ultra tough to get into and also the workload is intense. |
I'm not PP, but that was DC's experience |
Of course you would! |
| Rigor would require some tough grading. Yet most highly selective privates have sky high average GPAs. Therein is a disconnect. |
While possibly true, I had to laugh because someone on DCUM always adds UVA to any "select" college discussion here. |
Caltech should undoubtedly be on that list. Also Harvey Mudd (obscene workload), Swarthmore and Grinnell (over Middlebury and Bowdoin), and Reed. Also WashU. |
UVA is known for grade inflation and easy As. |
| I attended Vanderbilt. It was not very rigorous. My time at U Mich was much more intense. |
Lol so true |
| *trying to sneak UVA into every top anything list |