Talk to but for probably not for marriage as these arms would look bad once muscles get flabby and skin gets loose |
| Those big round button style black permanent piercings on ear lobes are probably the most questionable fashion choice ever. |
I guess that's the point. Taste is subjective. I think she looks absolutely beautiful. The PP said women like this don't "look right" in formal wear. I'm not sure what "looking right" actually means. But I do know that this women absolutely does not look wrong here. And its not even sex appeal. She just looks gorgeous and striking. And some of that is due to the body art she has |
Right because old, flabby and loose non-tattoed skin is so appealing. Your skin is gonna get loose whether you tattoo or not it. This is such a stupid argument. |
No, there is an objective element to taste. If she went to a formal society ball like that, she would absolutely not look right. And some of that, although not all of it, is due to her body art. |
You are wrong. Beauty & fashion has never come from fitting in and conforming. If she went to a formal ball, she would probably be the most beautiful one there, and likely the most talked about |
You sound like you’re 15 years old. And “tasteful” is an entirely different word from “beautiful”. |
Whatever. But just for perspective. I'm 47 years old and grew up in society in Boston, attending prep-boarding schools, became friends with all the famous old money New England names, have attended countless formal events, etc. I'm not bragging (in fact I usually try to hide that part of my life from most people), but more to explain that I'm no stranger to that world. She would turn a lot of heads at an event, and in a good way, not because she "doesnt look right" |
NP and absolutely agree. She looks beautiful. Also grew up in a monied, well educated, wasp-y family, and me and DH both work in very conservative industries. I'd put a wager on that woman looking a lot more beautiful when she's 70 than a lot of the un-tattooed dcum relationship forum crowd..... Also just side note.... tons of our friends who make $500k+ have tattoos these days. And a lot of the time, really big ones. This just isn't a big thing anymore. |
| OP tweet said 8% of women have visible tattoos. It's a non issue. |
And crepe skin in her 60s. Hi Grandma! It looks like a drug dealer or a porn star going to the porn star award show. |
And 50% have no tattoos. That leaves 50% of women in that age group for you to date OP. |
The people who are religious enough to be opposed to tattoos for "religious purposes" are not in the general dating pool. They are looking to marry people who are of the same faith and as religious as they are. |
Aren’t we lucky that the thinking of old stuffy, repressed WASPs trickles down into plebeian societywho are not shielded by the same wealth, privilege and status—which merely reinforces the implicit class element. Tattoos thee but not for me! |
| I don’t get tattoos. I don’t wear the same clothes or makeup every day, I change up my jewelry, I change the decor in my house—why would I want to look at the same body art day after day? |