Well, then it's a good thing nobody has said that. |
OP here and I also question DD’s studying efficiency. I don’t think it’s teasing to point out that sometimes our methods need to be modified. I’m not sure DD could have studied harder and she should be very proud of her effort. But reading this thread, including what I wrote, helps me identify that her problem may be more test strategy than preparation. |
So what's your solution? Or what do you see as the problem with AP Exams? |
You are responding to multiple posters. Why would there even need to be one single solution? |
So we should do a decision tree with multiple mastery evaluation options for every kid? That sounds untenable. |
Same. My kid got an A- in her AP classes and scored 3s. She’s fine and so are we. She does well in class and crappy on standardized tests. Outgoing kid who’s comfortable with herself. I feel lucky to have such a well-adjusted kid. She’s plans to apply to an Ivy this fall and has a really good shot. And if she doesn’t get in, she knows she will land somewhere else where she’ll be fine. |
| My kid got one 4 and the rest 3s and is kicking butt in college. It is one test on one day and does not define the student. |
Ha ha if you really think your A- /3s kid has a “really good shot” at an Ivy. She has almost zero shot. Do you live under a rock? |
That’s because it is. They can’t tailor college readiness or mastery of material to each individual student. So they use something like test scores as a benchmark. It’s not going to change any time soon. |
I was thinking the same thing but didn’t know how to phrase it. Maybe she’s a nationally ranked athlete or won the Pulitzer or is a piano prodigy? |
Almost everyone has almost zero shot. |
Who is "we"? Are you a college admissions officer? |
lol.. it basically involved sitting for hours but with a lot of "breaks" in between, and short stints of reviewing and reading. I told DC that at work, when I need to really focus on something, I need at least 2 hours of uninterrupted time to really delve into and absorb the details. The short stints of studying with frequent breaks is not conducive to really absorbing the material, but what can we expect from the generation of tiktok and instant gratification. Fortunately, DC is only 15 so they have time to learn how to focus... hopefully. I don't know if DC will actually heed my advice, though. They have a short term memory about lessons learned. |
I think PP meant the tease was not telling us how the kid was studying. In our house it was never cracking the spine on the study guide books, refusing to study in the study room or join any study groups, but to sit at the computer with one screen on the friend chat and the one on a click based study guide. Sometimes, teenagers just need to fail in order to learn the lesson. DC was lucky to get a 3 that way. |
You’re simply being hyperbolic. Did I suggest… or even remotely imply… that we should get rid of AP tests? No, I didn’t. They are one data point. I’m not sure why it’s a threatening notion that there are educators (many of us) who don’t put all of our eggs in a high-stakes test basket. I get more valuable data regarding my students’ progress from project based assessments. I’m able to get a better handle on an individual student’s strengths and setbacks this way. I spend a ton of time doing this. I suppose I can throw an old AP test their way, which would save me a ton of time. I wouldn’t be serving the students nearly as well, though. I actually value learning, the joy of learning, and the retention of knowledge. I don’t value high-stakes multiple choice assessments as much. I don’t think of my students as scores. I suspect you care a lot about scores. Have at it. They are a great way to get into colleges. Just know they aren’t the only way. I’ve taught over 3,200 students so far in my career. I’ve learned not to base a student’s success off a test score. Good thing, too, since many mediocre test takers went on to be tremendously successful. |