Will there be class action law suits against Harvard?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I mean thousands of people potentially suffered damages from Harvard's unconstitutional racism. If each of them is awarded $1 million, it'll do part of the justice.

It was not deemed unconstitutional until yesterday.

Racial discrimination has been against the law since long time ago.

it wasn't considered racial discrimination until yesterday.

It was determined yesterday that it was racial discrimination. This also means it has been racial discrimination which is, was and always has been unlawful. They were just found guilty of the crime they committed yesterday. Why shouldn't they be held accountable?
If someone was guilty of murdering yesterday, could you say he should be freed because he was just found guilty?

Op, there were numerous SC precedents that previously held affirmative action constitutional. This is not a case of clear-cut violations of the law.

And yesterday we learned that they were all wrongly decided and that the law actually barred the actions that Harvard and other schools freely admit to. There are years worth of applicants still within the statute of limitations

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:
Giving arbitrary big negative points to Asiasn on courage/likability/kindness was crossing the line big time

I can see huge class act civil lawsuit

Yes, please, spend your money on a big class action lawsuit against Harvard. Have at it.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:
Giving arbitrary big negative points to Asiasn on courage/likability/kindness was crossing the line big time

I can see huge class act civil lawsuit

Penetrating legal analysis, PP.

Tell me you're not a lawyer without telling me you're not a lawyer.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:They have to pay then in Yen

This post really shows liberals are just a bunch of racist and ignorant f*cks.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I mean thousands of people potentially suffered damages from Harvard's unconstitutional racism. If each of them is awarded $1 million, it'll do part of the justice.

It was not deemed unconstitutional until yesterday.

Racial discrimination has been against the law since long time ago.

it wasn't considered racial discrimination until yesterday.

It was determined yesterday that it was racial discrimination. This also means it has been racial discrimination which is, was and always has been unlawful. They were just found guilty of the crime they committed yesterday. Why shouldn't they be held accountable?
If someone was guilty of murdering yesterday, could you say he should be freed because he was just found guilty?

Op, there were numerous SC precedents that previously held affirmative action constitutional. This is not a case of clear-cut violations of the law.

And yesterday we learned that they were all wrongly decided and that the law actually barred the actions that Harvard and other schools freely admit to. There are years worth of applicants still within the statute of limitations

That’s not the way that works.

What law school did you go to?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I mean thousands of people potentially suffered damages from Harvard's unconstitutional racism. If each of them is awarded $1 million, it'll do part of the justice.

It was not deemed unconstitutional until yesterday.

Racial discrimination has been against the law since long time ago.

it wasn't considered racial discrimination until yesterday.

It was determined yesterday that it was racial discrimination. This also means it has been racial discrimination which is, was and always has been unlawful. They were just found guilty of the crime they committed yesterday. Why shouldn't they be held accountable?
If someone was guilty of murdering yesterday, could you say he should be freed because he was just found guilty?

Op, there were numerous SC precedents that previously held affirmative action constitutional. This is not a case of clear-cut violations of the law.

And yesterday we learned that they were all wrongly decided and that the law actually barred the actions that Harvard and other schools freely admit to. There are years worth of applicants still within the statute of limitations

That's . . . not how this works, OP. But you continue to wait for your $1m. Good luck to you.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:They have to pay then in Yen

I'll take yen euro bitcoin whatever
Duh

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I mean thousands of people potentially suffered damages from Harvard's unconstitutional racism. If each of them is awarded $1 million, it'll do part of the justice.

It was not deemed unconstitutional until yesterday.

Racial discrimination has been against the law since long time ago.

it wasn't considered racial discrimination until yesterday.

It was determined yesterday that it was racial discrimination. This also means it has been racial discrimination which is, was and always has been unlawful. They were just found guilty of the crime they committed yesterday. Why shouldn't they be held accountable?
If someone was guilty of murdering yesterday, could you say he should be freed because he was just found guilty?

Op, there were numerous SC precedents that previously held affirmative action constitutional. This is not a case of clear-cut violations of the law.

And yesterday we learned that they were all wrongly decided and that the law actually barred the actions that Harvard and other schools freely admit to. There are years worth of applicants still within the statute of limitations

That's . . . not how this works, OP. But you continue to wait for your $1m. Good luck to you.

That post wasn't from the OP. You keep thinking there has only been one person against you on this forum. This is why you got so narrowed view of the world.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:
Giving arbitrary big negative points to Asiasn on courage/likability/kindness was crossing the line big time

I can see huge class act civil lawsuit

My old public HS 45 years ago was the number one Public school in US with maybe 2-3 Asian kids. We did have white, black, Spanish, Jewish and was a non magnet school.

It is still great but barely in top 100 anymore and it is 97 percent Chinese now. There teams stink and zero school spirit. Like a prison camp now.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I mean thousands of people potentially suffered damages from Harvard's unconstitutional racism. If each of them is awarded $1 million, it'll do part of the justice.

It was not deemed unconstitutional until yesterday.

Racial discrimination has been against the law since long time ago.

it wasn't considered racial discrimination until yesterday.

It was determined yesterday that it was racial discrimination. This also means it has been racial discrimination which is, was and always has been unlawful. They were just found guilty of the crime they committed yesterday. Why shouldn't they be held accountable?
If someone was guilty of murdering yesterday, could you say he should be freed because he was just found guilty?

Op, there were numerous SC precedents that previously held affirmative action constitutional. This is not a case of clear-cut violations of the law.

And yesterday we learned that they were all wrongly decided and that the law actually barred the actions that Harvard and other schools freely admit to. There are years worth of applicants still within the statute of limitations

That's . . . not how this works, OP. But you continue to wait for your $1m. Good luck to you.

i

That’s exactly how it works, the law didn’t change yesterday, the Supreme Court just clarified what the law actually was. That’s the difference between a court decision and a new statute- one is only forward looking and the other clarifies what was already true

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
Giving arbitrary big negative points to Asiasn on courage/likability/kindness was crossing the line big time

I can see huge class act civil lawsuit

My old public HS 45 years ago was the number one Public school in US with maybe 2-3 Asian kids. We did have white, black, Spanish, Jewish and was a non magnet school.

It is still great but barely in top 100 anymore and it is 97 percent Chinese now. There teams stink and zero school spirit. Like a prison camp now.

Name the school, you lying POS.

[Anonymous]

I think we have Harvard legal team here working hard

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I mean thousands of people potentially suffered damages from Harvard's unconstitutional racism. If each of them is awarded $1 million, it'll do part of the justice.

It was not deemed unconstitutional until yesterday.

Racial discrimination has been against the law since long time ago.

it wasn't considered racial discrimination until yesterday.

It was determined yesterday that it was racial discrimination. This also means it has been racial discrimination which is, was and always has been unlawful. They were just found guilty of the crime they committed yesterday. Why shouldn't they be held accountable?
If someone was guilty of murdering yesterday, could you say he should be freed because he was just found guilty?

Op, there were numerous SC precedents that previously held affirmative action constitutional. This is not a case of clear-cut violations of the law.

And yesterday we learned that they were all wrongly decided and that the law actually barred the actions that Harvard and other schools freely admit to. There are years worth of applicants still within the statute of limitations

PP, you need to go back to high civics class.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I mean thousands of people potentially suffered damages from Harvard's unconstitutional racism. If each of them is awarded $1 million, it'll do part of the justice.

It was not deemed unconstitutional until yesterday.

Racial discrimination has been against the law since long time ago.

it wasn't considered racial discrimination until yesterday.

It was determined yesterday that it was racial discrimination. This also means it has been racial discrimination which is, was and always has been unlawful. They were just found guilty of the crime they committed yesterday. Why shouldn't they be held accountable?
If someone was guilty of murdering yesterday, could you say he should be freed because he was just found guilty?

Op, there were numerous SC precedents that previously held affirmative action constitutional. This is not a case of clear-cut violations of the law.

And yesterday we learned that they were all wrongly decided and that the law actually barred the actions that Harvard and other schools freely admit to. There are years worth of applicants still within the statute of limitations

That's . . . not how this works, OP. But you continue to wait for your $1m. Good luck to you.

That post wasn't from the OP. You keep thinking there has only been one person against you on this forum. This is why you got so narrowed view of the world.

Well, that's disheartening. I'd hoped that there was only one blithering idiot posting here, but apparently there are two. That's what I get for being an optimist.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I mean thousands of people potentially suffered damages from Harvard's unconstitutional racism. If each of them is awarded $1 million, it'll do part of the justice.

It was not deemed unconstitutional until yesterday.

Racial discrimination has been against the law since long time ago.

it wasn't considered racial discrimination until yesterday.

It was determined yesterday that it was racial discrimination. This also means it has been racial discrimination which is, was and always has been unlawful. They were just found guilty of the crime they committed yesterday. Why shouldn't they be held accountable?
If someone was guilty of murdering yesterday, could you say he should be freed because he was just found guilty?

Op, there were numerous SC precedents that previously held affirmative action constitutional. This is not a case of clear-cut violations of the law.

And yesterday we learned that they were all wrongly decided and that the law actually barred the actions that Harvard and other schools freely admit to. There are years worth of applicants still within the statute of limitations

That's . . . not how this works, OP. But you continue to wait for your $1m. Good luck to you.

That post wasn't from the OP. You keep thinking there has only been one person against you on this forum. This is why you got so narrowed view of the world.

Well, that's disheartening. I'd hoped that there was only one blithering idiot posting here, but apparently there are two. That's what I get for being an optimist.

There're definitely more than one idiot like you.