Which makes some sense - there is way more to know. Despite the reflexively cynical commentary you often hear on how much dumber everyone is getting; humans are developing knowledge at a frenetic pace. Some huge chunk of what humanity knows has been learned in the last 50 years. |
Flynn effect. |
You know the GOP holds the majority of seats in the House, right? And are close to taking control of the Senate, right? And came within 50,000 votes in a few swing states to re-electing Trump, right? And the GOP holds the majority of governorships and controls the majority of state legislatures. The GOP’s demise has been greatly exaggerated. |
You left out supporting affirmative action and a more enlightened approach toward policing. |
|
| Practice is what works. Practice works for athletes. Practice works for math and spelling bees. American children and teens will not spend time practicing academics. End of story. AI will eliminate most jobs requiring more than a button pusher. Americans should wear our laziness like a badge of honor. |
You mean creativity, rebelliousness and ability to innovate. |
This is it. There is still a large portion of our society who do not want integrated schools. DC is a prime example of this! The rich white parents (regardless of political affiliation) do not want their kids in DC public schools. The comments in the DCPS forum on Banneker HS are atrocious. |
You say that but you are ignoring the fact that rich black parents (regardless of political affiliation) do not want their kid sin DC public schools. Nor do not-so-rich white parents and not-so-rich black parents. The framing of your post perpetuates problems. |
Not really. My comment is a reflection of my experience. |
This. Plus, considering the fact that unemployment is extremely low, Biden is doing ok. |
I'm black. HHI $800k. My kids went to DCPS, as did many of their well to do friends. Guess what, they can even read. |
|
Part of the problem is the sheer magnitude of wealth disparity. Very rich people do not want their kids having to interact with very poor people.
I grew up in a small city of about 50,000 people. Everyone went to the same school system, feeding into one high school, and it was invaluable. There was a small Catholic school that took K-8, but otherwise, there weren't any private options. Having kids from the richest and the poorest families going to school together helped with the education of all of the kids; kept people out of their bubbles a little bit; and helped the community -- since the education of all of the kids rose and fell together. It only worked, I think, because the rich weren't enormously rich and there weren't a great number of truly poor kids. Still, in the areas where it is possible, I think that's the kind of cross-section of families and students we should aspire to having in the mix. |
It’s because there has been a war on poor people. Republicans think they’re lazy fraudsters and liberals think they’re not smart but neither want their kids around them. |
There's also racism and Puritanism in the mix. Part of the reason we don't have a stronger safety net like you see in a lot of European countries is that "we" don't regard a lot of the members in our society as "us." This is particularly acute when it comes to white and black; and especially in places that historically relied heavily on slavery as an economic model. People are generally willing to be taxed for benefits that they regard as going to other members of the tribe but very unwilling if they think the taxes are going to go to "them" (with "them" being someone outside of what they regard as their tribe.) Our historical Puritanism plays into it because it's helped us come to regard possession of wealth as an indication of virtue (e.g. industry and thrift) and God's grace; whereas we have come to regard poverty as a sign of vice (e.g. sloth) and of God's disfavor. In this context, a social safety net is a moral hazard - discouraging virtuous behavior - and goes against God's will. |