Harris ready to be President?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I supported her when she ran, and would support her if she runs again. Like Obama and Bill Clinton, I suspect she would surround herself with very bright wonky government types. Biden has been drawn to more political lightening rods picks, fewer nerds. I think KH would revert back to the nerds and boring competent governance.

The people she picks keep quitting her team.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I supported her when she ran, and would support her if she runs again. Like Obama and Bill Clinton, I suspect she would surround herself with very bright wonky government types. Biden has been drawn to more political lightening rods picks, fewer nerds. I think KH would revert back to the nerds and boring competent governance.

She can't even hold on to a chief of staff or a spokesperson. Her staff turnover is absurd. She inspires no loyalty. She has no policy chops at all. No one in the Biden administration trusts her with anything substantial. She's a terrible public speaker. She does not inspire trust. Being the DA in San Francisco is not a plus in this political environment. She will not attract competent people to work in her Administration should it come to that. She cannot handle constructive criticism without taking it personally. And much as I despise Trump, at least he kept us out of stupid wars. Harris, being deeply insecure, is the sort of politician who will start wars to look "tough" and hope for a rally around the flag effect to lift her own political prospects. She would be a terrible president.

DP. That's the best analysis of her I've ever read.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:No worries about AI, folks. Kamala has been put in charge of AI. What can possibly go wrong?

Many of the world's best minds have warned about the dangers of AI, specifically that it could destroy humanity if an assessment of risk is not done now.

Tech giants like Elon Musk fear AI will soon surpass human intelligence and have independent thinking. This means it would no longer need or listen to humans, allowing it to steal nuclear codes, create pandemics and spark world wars.

Vice President Kamala Harris - who has the lowest approval rating of any VP - will lead the containment effort as 'AI czar' with a budget of just $140 million. For comparison, Space Force has a budget of $30 billion.

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-12046711/White-House-lays-AI-damage-control-plan-KAMALA-HARRIS-programs-czar.html#:~:text=The%20White%20House%27s%20plan,participate%20in%20a%20public%20evaluation.%27

She failed at being "Border Czar," so they've pivoted to "AI Czar"? It's like something from the Onion.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:No worries about AI, folks. Kamala has been put in charge of AI. What can possibly go wrong?

Many of the world's best minds have warned about the dangers of AI, specifically that it could destroy humanity if an assessment of risk is not done now.

Tech giants like Elon Musk fear AI will soon surpass human intelligence and have independent thinking. This means it would no longer need or listen to humans, allowing it to steal nuclear codes, create pandemics and spark world wars.

Vice President Kamala Harris - who has the lowest approval rating of any VP - will lead the containment effort as 'AI czar' with a budget of just $140 million. For comparison, Space Force has a budget of $30 billion.

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-12046711/White-House-lays-AI-damage-control-plan-KAMALA-HARRIS-programs-czar.html#:~:text=The%20White%20House%27s%20plan,participate%20in%20a%20public%20evaluation.%27

That would explain things, that she is actually an AI, or has an AI writing her speeches.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I supported her when she ran, and would support her if she runs again. Like Obama and Bill Clinton, I suspect she would surround herself with very bright wonky government types. Biden has been drawn to more political lightening rods picks, fewer nerds. I think KH would revert back to the nerds and boring competent governance.

She can't even hold on to a chief of staff or a spokesperson. Her staff turnover is absurd. She inspires no loyalty. She has no policy chops at all. No one in the Biden administration trusts her with anything substantial. She's a terrible public speaker. She does not inspire trust. Being the DA in San Francisco is not a plus in this political environment. She will not attract competent people to work in her Administration should it come to that. She cannot handle constructive criticism without taking it personally. And much as I despise Trump, at least he kept us out of stupid wars. Harris, being deeply insecure, is the sort of politician who will start wars to look "tough" and hope for a rally around the flag effect to lift her own political prospects. She would be a terrible president.

DP. That's the best analysis of her I've ever read.

Unreadable as impossible to filter out gender/racial bias. Biden was hugely unpopular as VP and got elected president. Does Harris have worse turnover than Obama during his first term?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I supported her when she ran, and would support her if she runs again. Like Obama and Bill Clinton, I suspect she would surround herself with very bright wonky government types. Biden has been drawn to more political lightening rods picks, fewer nerds. I think KH would revert back to the nerds and boring competent governance.

She can't even hold on to a chief of staff or a spokesperson. Her staff turnover is absurd. She inspires no loyalty. She has no policy chops at all. No one in the Biden administration trusts her with anything substantial. She's a terrible public speaker. She does not inspire trust. Being the DA in San Francisco is not a plus in this political environment. She will not attract competent people to work in her Administration should it come to that. She cannot handle constructive criticism without taking it personally. And much as I despise Trump, at least he kept us out of stupid wars. Harris, being deeply insecure, is the sort of politician who will start wars to look "tough" and hope for a rally around the flag effect to lift her own political prospects. She would be a terrible president.

DP. That's the best analysis of her I've ever read.

Unreadable as impossible to filter out gender/racial bias. Biden was hugely unpopular as VP and got elected president. Does Harris have worse turnover than Obama during his first term?

Harris makes Obama look like God himself

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I supported her when she ran, and would support her if she runs again. Like Obama and Bill Clinton, I suspect she would surround herself with very bright wonky government types. Biden has been drawn to more political lightening rods picks, fewer nerds. I think KH would revert back to the nerds and boring competent governance.

Impossible to filter out bias? What does that even mean? Was there a single assertion in that post you would like to question?

She can't even hold on to a chief of staff or a spokesperson. Her staff turnover is absurd. She inspires no loyalty. She has no policy chops at all. No one in the Biden administration trusts her with anything substantial. She's a terrible public speaker. She does not inspire trust. Being the DA in San Francisco is not a plus in this political environment. She will not attract competent people to work in her Administration should it come to that. She cannot handle constructive criticism without taking it personally. And much as I despise Trump, at least he kept us out of stupid wars. Harris, being deeply insecure, is the sort of politician who will start wars to look "tough" and hope for a rally around the flag effect to lift her own political prospects. She would be a terrible president.

DP. That's the best analysis of her I've ever read.

Unreadable as impossible to filter out gender/racial bias. Biden was hugely unpopular as VP and got elected president. Does Harris have worse turnover than Obama during his first term?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I supported her when she ran, and would support her if she runs again. Like Obama and Bill Clinton, I suspect she would surround herself with very bright wonky government types. Biden has been drawn to more political lightening rods picks, fewer nerds. I think KH would revert back to the nerds and boring competent governance.

She can't even hold on to a chief of staff or a spokesperson. Her staff turnover is absurd. She inspires no loyalty. She has no policy chops at all. No one in the Biden administration trusts her with anything substantial. She's a terrible public speaker. She does not inspire trust. Being the DA in San Francisco is not a plus in this political environment. She will not attract competent people to work in her Administration should it come to that. She cannot handle constructive criticism without taking it personally. And much as I despise Trump, at least he kept us out of stupid wars. Harris, being deeply insecure, is the sort of politician who will start wars to look "tough" and hope for a rally around the flag effect to lift her own political prospects. She would be a terrible president.

DP. That's the best analysis of her I've ever read.

Unreadable as impossible to filter out gender/racial bias. Biden was hugely unpopular as VP and got elected president. Does Harris have worse turnover than Obama during his first term?

What does “impossible to filter out gender/racial bias” mean in English? Do you disagree with any specific assertions made in the post?

[Anonymous]

Yes! She has had a great mentor and if they would let her be her, we’d all see what a lovely yet hard as nails & capable woman she is.

Go Kamala!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Other than Hillary, she’s the worst candidate ever out forward. Even her own state hated her which is why she got 1% of the vote.

Hearing her even speak makes me want to take a fork to my ear drums.

Neither her nor Biden can form a complete sentence let along a full thought or idea.

There’s. Resins she’s kept out if the media spotlight…she’s as likable as wasp sting and many people would rather swim through a pool of tetanus infested needles than head her speak.

I want to have a woman president just not THAT woman…

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:No one is ready until they are. She has a better than average chance.

Based on her last run for President? Why would anyone vote for her next time?

The question was is she ready to be president not will she run a successful campaign.

Running for president and being president or two very different jobs.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I supported her when she ran, and would support her if she runs again. Like Obama and Bill Clinton, I suspect she would surround herself with very bright wonky government types. Biden has been drawn to more political lightening rods picks, fewer nerds. I think KH would revert back to the nerds and boring competent governance.

Impossible to filter out bias? What does that even mean? Was there a single assertion in that post you would like to question?

She can't even hold on to a chief of staff or a spokesperson. Her staff turnover is absurd. She inspires no loyalty. She has no policy chops at all. No one in the Biden administration trusts her with anything substantial. She's a terrible public speaker. She does not inspire trust. Being the DA in San Francisco is not a plus in this political environment. She will not attract competent people to work in her Administration should it come to that. She cannot handle constructive criticism without taking it personally. And much as I despise Trump, at least he kept us out of stupid wars. Harris, being deeply insecure, is the sort of politician who will start wars to look "tough" and hope for a rally around the flag effect to lift her own political prospects. She would be a terrible president.

DP. That's the best analysis of her I've ever read.

Unreadable as impossible to filter out gender/racial bias. Biden was hugely unpopular as VP and got elected president. Does Harris have worse turnover than Obama during his first term?

?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Yes! She has had a great mentor and if they would let her be her, we’d all see what a lovely yet hard as nails & capable woman she is.

Go Kamala!

sounds like "let Trump be Trump"

no, please don't, I think we've seen what we need to see

[Anonymous]

besides, do you think the leadership of the free world should be in the hands of someone whose "mentor" won't "let" her "be her"?

sounds like a child

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I supported her when she ran, and would support her if she runs again. Like Obama and Bill Clinton, I suspect she would surround herself with very bright wonky government types. Biden has been drawn to more political lightening rods picks, fewer nerds. I think KH would revert back to the nerds and boring competent governance.

She can't even hold on to a chief of staff or a spokesperson. Her staff turnover is absurd. She inspires no loyalty. She has no policy chops at all. No one in the Biden administration trusts her with anything substantial. She's a terrible public speaker. She does not inspire trust. Being the DA in San Francisco is not a plus in this political environment. She will not attract competent people to work in her Administration should it come to that. She cannot handle constructive criticism without taking it personally. And much as I despise Trump, at least he kept us out of stupid wars. Harris, being deeply insecure, is the sort of politician who will start wars to look "tough" and hope for a rally around the flag effect to lift her own political prospects. She would be a terrible president.

DP. That's the best analysis of her I've ever read.

Unreadable as impossible to filter out gender/racial bias. Biden was hugely unpopular as VP and got elected president. Does Harris have worse turnover than Obama during his first term?

What does “impossible to filter out gender/racial bias” mean in English? Do you disagree with any specific assertions made in the post?

DP. The PP is simply unable to accept criticism of women or POC. It's something she'll have to get over, as no one is shielded from valid criticisms, regardless of their gender/race.