Amazon ad with Girl with mustache

[Anonymous]

The yellow faux leather jacket with the multiple straps is an homage to Eddie Murphy (who wore a similar red jacket in his most famous stand up concert).

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It freaked me out. What was that about? Was it something with trans?

I hadn't seen it until I saw this thread. I'm a trans woman and after watching it, it seems pretty obvious to me that the person in the video is a nonbinary AFAB person, most likely on testosterone. It's clearly queer coded and the person is clearly supposed to be gender nonconforming and almost certainly nonbinary. They could have made it more obvious with something like a trans flag but that's probably too on the nose for cis viewers. I'd wager the only reason that there wasn't a blahaj in the video is because it's an Ikea product. If you're not familiar, it's a large and inexpensive stuffed shark from Ikea that happens to have the same colors as the trans flag and has become a thing in trans culture.

I don’t know. I thought it was about a girl accepting herself as she is with a mustache rather than conform to societal standards, as many women have a mustache if they don’t wax it off. I don’t think everyone nonconforming to societal standards needs to be trans or non-binary. Yes, I’m cis, but also that’s my take on it and the audience is everyone. Maybe it’s vague so we can all take from it as we see fit, and in that case it’s well done. We can all see ourselves in that girl.

I don’t like it mostly because I think, to me, it’s like she wants desperately to find acceptance through buying things on Amazon. It’s just a weird message.

Find happiness through buying things of the message of all ads.

[Anonymous]

Women just can't win and other women are the reason.

Unless a woman conforms to a standard that other women have set for her, she is going to be called gross and unattractive. this is supposed to be a child of maybe 15-16 in the commercial just figuring out who she is and trying to love herself. But DCUM harpies have to be hating on everything. I'm sure you'd all be up in arms if someone commented on how your daughter's shorts were too tight.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It freaked me out. What was that about? Was it something with trans?

I hadn't seen it until I saw this thread. I'm a trans woman and after watching it, it seems pretty obvious to me that the person in the video is a nonbinary AFAB person, most likely on testosterone. It's clearly queer coded and the person is clearly supposed to be gender nonconforming and almost certainly nonbinary. They could have made it more obvious with something like a trans flag but that's probably too on the nose for cis viewers. I'd wager the only reason that there wasn't a blahaj in the video is because it's an Ikea product. If you're not familiar, it's a large and inexpensive stuffed shark from Ikea that happens to have the same colors as the trans flag and has become a thing in trans culture.

I don’t know. I thought it was about a girl accepting herself as she is with a mustache rather than conform to societal standards, as many women have a mustache if they don’t wax it off. I don’t think everyone nonconforming to societal standards needs to be trans or non-binary. Yes, I’m cis, but also that’s my take on it and the audience is everyone. Maybe it’s vague so we can all take from it as we see fit, and in that case it’s well done. We can all see ourselves in that girl.

I don’t like it mostly because I think, to me, it’s like she wants desperately to find acceptance through buying things on Amazon. It’s just a weird message.

Find happiness through buying things of the message of all ads.

Yeahhhh….but maybe I just don’t think I’m her situation it would work and that is the problem.

I see it like well, if you wanted to be accepted this is not the way to go.

Maybe it’s the way it’s directed. If she seemed more to have obtained the self acceptance that she didn’t care, it would work? The way it looks to me is more like she’s decided to try something edgy that would make her social stature worse.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Women just can't win and other women are the reason.

Unless a woman conforms to a standard that other women have set for her, she is going to be called gross and unattractive. this is supposed to be a child of maybe 15-16 in the commercial just figuring out who she is and trying to love herself. But DCUM harpies have to be hating on everything. I'm sure you'd all be up in arms if someone commented on how your daughter's shorts were too tight.

I think the fact that people are posting on it is kind of the point of the ad.

So it’s not being harpies, it’s discussing the effect of art in advertising on the audience.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Women just can't win and other women are the reason.

Unless a woman conforms to a standard that other women have set for her, she is going to be called gross and unattractive. this is supposed to be a child of maybe 15-16 in the commercial just figuring out who she is and trying to love herself. But DCUM harpies have to be hating on everything. I'm sure you'd all be up in arms if someone commented on how your daughter's shorts were too tight.

The thing about ads is this: they should resonate with the most people in a positive way.

I’ll never understand why marketing firms think showcasing something that isn’t likely to resonate with most women will yield positive results. Face it: you rarely see a woman with a mustache IRL. It’s not a good look.

There are other ways to convey nonconformity. A Mohawk. Purple hair. A granny in a moto jacket. A teen in coastal grandma gear.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:The yellow faux leather jacket with the multiple straps is an homage to Eddie Murphy (who wore a similar red jacket in his most famous stand up concert).

Please tell me you’re trolling

It is, of course, Freddie Mercury’s yellow jacket.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Women just can't win and other women are the reason.

Unless a woman conforms to a standard that other women have set for her, she is going to be called gross and unattractive. this is supposed to be a child of maybe 15-16 in the commercial just figuring out who she is and trying to love herself. But DCUM harpies have to be hating on everything. I'm sure you'd all be up in arms if someone commented on how your daughter's shorts were too tight.

The thing about ads is this: they should resonate with the most people in a positive way.

I’ll never understand why marketing firms think showcasing something that isn’t likely to resonate with most women will yield positive results. Face it: you rarely see a woman with a mustache IRL. It’s not a good look.

There are other ways to convey nonconformity. A Mohawk. Purple hair. A granny in a moto jacket. A teen in coastal grandma gear.

The gap in her teeth. The hook was already there.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It freaked me out. What was that about? Was it something with trans?

I hadn't seen it until I saw this thread. I'm a trans woman and after watching it, it seems pretty obvious to me that the person in the video is a nonbinary AFAB person, most likely on testosterone. It's clearly queer coded and the person is clearly supposed to be gender nonconforming and almost certainly nonbinary. They could have made it more obvious with something like a trans flag but that's probably too on the nose for cis viewers. I'd wager the only reason that there wasn't a blahaj in the video is because it's an Ikea product. If you're not familiar, it's a large and inexpensive stuffed shark from Ikea that happens to have the same colors as the trans flag and has become a thing in trans culture.

I don’t know. I thought it was about a girl accepting herself as she is with a mustache rather than conform to societal standards, as many women have a mustache if they don’t wax it off. I don’t think everyone nonconforming to societal standards needs to be trans or non-binary. Yes, I’m cis, but also that’s my take on it and the audience is everyone. Maybe it’s vague so we can all take from it as we see fit, and in that case it’s well done. We can all see ourselves in that girl.

I don’t like it mostly because I think, to me, it’s like she wants desperately to find acceptance through buying things on Amazon. It’s just a weird message.

Find happiness through buying things of the message of all ads.

Yeah that’s the bad part about it. Shifting from one toxic way of thinking to another.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Women just can't win and other women are the reason.

Unless a woman conforms to a standard that other women have set for her, she is going to be called gross and unattractive. this is supposed to be a child of maybe 15-16 in the commercial just figuring out who she is and trying to love herself. But DCUM harpies have to be hating on everything. I'm sure you'd all be up in arms if someone commented on how your daughter's shorts were too tight.

I think the fact that people are posting on it is kind of the point of the ad.

So it’s not being harpies, it’s discussing the effect of art in advertising on the audience.

So calling the girl gross and disgusting is discussing the effect of art??

[Anonymous]

As a woman who underwent electrolysis on my mustache years ago because I was self-conscious about it, I gotta say I like the ad. I don’t see it as having anything to do with being trans so much as a girl who decides not to conform to beauty standards. Fine with me!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Women just can't win and other women are the reason.

Unless a woman conforms to a standard that other women have set for her, she is going to be called gross and unattractive. this is supposed to be a child of maybe 15-16 in the commercial just figuring out who she is and trying to love herself. But DCUM harpies have to be hating on everything. I'm sure you'd all be up in arms if someone commented on how your daughter's shorts were too tight.

The thing about ads is this: they should resonate with the most people in a positive way.

I’ll never understand why marketing firms think showcasing something that isn’t likely to resonate with most women will yield positive results. Face it: you rarely see a woman with a mustache IRL. It’s not a good look.

There are other ways to convey nonconformity. A Mohawk. Purple hair. A granny in a moto jacket. A teen in coastal grandma gear.

Haven’t seen the ad, but the bolded is going to vary depending on where you live and what kind of crowd your kid runs with. I have a teenage daughter in a school for performing and visual arts, and there is a whole lot of body and facial hair going on in the born-female crowd. So much so that I hardly register it on young women anymore. There is definitely a conscious radical self-acceptance movement among a certain group of young women and they absolutely couldn’t care less who they offend.

[Anonymous]

I HATE IT.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Women just can't win and other women are the reason.

Unless a woman conforms to a standard that other women have set for her, she is going to be called gross and unattractive. this is supposed to be a child of maybe 15-16 in the commercial just figuring out who she is and trying to love herself. But DCUM harpies have to be hating on everything. I'm sure you'd all be up in arms if someone commented on how your daughter's shorts were too tight.

The thing about ads is this: they should resonate with the most people in a positive way.

I’ll never understand why marketing firms think showcasing something that isn’t likely to resonate with most women will yield positive results. Face it: you rarely see a woman with a mustache IRL. It’s not a good look.

There are other ways to convey nonconformity. A Mohawk. Purple hair. A granny in a moto jacket. A teen in coastal grandma gear.

Haven’t seen the ad, but the bolded is going to vary depending on where you live and what kind of crowd your kid runs with. I have a teenage daughter in a school for performing and visual arts, and there is a whole lot of body and facial hair going on in the born-female crowd. So much so that I hardly register it on young women anymore. There is definitely a conscious radical self-acceptance movement among a certain group of young women and they absolutely couldn’t care less who they offend.

I love that. Whether it's hair, body type, etc. It's about time women learned to love themselves.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I HATE IT.

…, said many when women had the audacity to wear trousers in the 1920s.

“The main reason why parents refused to buy their daughters a pair of trousers or restricted their use was that trousers were perceived as indecent. One of the respondents described how she had asked her mother whether “we women” should not also wear trousers: “The answer was clear, they don’t belong to women, and why should we imitate men?” (SKS KRA Housut 88.2006, respondent born in 1929). Reactions to women’s trousers were mostly negative; they were seen as indecent, immoral, disgusting and too mannish for women.”

https://ee.openlibhums.org/article/id/1788/