|
Yeah. It’s not ok to rush baby. Maybe can the dressing down though? Or find a supportive way to explain the timetable for when to intervene. If we tell people their questions are bizarre or nonsensical they won’t get asked due to this being a critical space without constructive information. Or worse they try something super unsafe because no one was there to advise. And while these are excellent questions for her doc that’s clearly not the only place information is being sought.
|
PP here - yeah, it surprised me at the time (especially because I was only 33/not high risk or anything) and I was super anxious about what to do. My doctor kept telling me she had done a lot of reading and stayed up on latest best practice and that if I felt strongly I could go to 40 weeks before inducing, but they really recommended 39 - I was so torn, it felt weird going against medical advice but I also am not one to jump at interventions…honestly I still hadn’t quite decided what to do, but my body went into labor at 38+4 and the decision was made for me |
That’s not bizarre at all. She’s not trying to push her doctor to schedule an induction based on visitors’ timing, she’s just saying it really would be nice it this timing worked out, does anyone have any tips of things to try at home? What’s bizarre to me is that people are acting like this is some crazy off the wall question, when really it’s something 90+% of pregnant women are googling once they hit a certain point |
Seriously? Why are you on this forum. There is nothing wrong with OP asking this question. |
Cite article where it states 90+% of pregnant women are googling this information once they hit a certain point. |
NP. It’s the woe is me attitude of the OP in regards to having to do things that millions upon millions of women do and have done since the beginning of time. |
Congratulations... geez. OP I have no idea why people are being jerks about this. My OB will put anyone interested on the elective induction list at 39 weeks because it's totally reasonable and evidence based. Anyway I had a membrane sweep at 39+6 and that did it for me for my 2nd child. Unfortunately with my first though I had two sweeps and they did nothing, had to be induced. |
Gotta get that baby out for visitor convenience. |
Who cares what the reason is though if medically there is no reason not to induce at 39 weeks? I was completely miserable with a knee injury barely able to walk to take care of my toddler so by 39 weeks I was feeling desperate for baby to come out. He seemed pretty ready considering labor was only 2 hours long. I judge people who wait until 42 weeks way more than anyone getting induced at 39.... if you look at the risks there's no question which scenario is safer for mother and baby. |
| Spicy food? |
You don’t want to be judged while you judge others. Got it. Your reason for induction was not for a visit, idiot. Doctors do not wait until 42 weeks to induce, again, you’re an idiot. 40 weeks is full term so if someone waits till then, that is again, full term. |
Physicians do not wait until week 42 so your comparison does not exist. |
Full-term is 280 days which is 40 weeks. 39 weeks is not late and baby can stay without being induced for another week or two. OP should not have had mother come only to leave before baby is due. |
Wow, you might want to take a walk or something. I know people who wanted birth center /home births and waited until 42 weeks hoping baby would come on his/her own. When that didn't happen the midwife said they had to go to the hospital for the birth. So yeah, again compared to people going with evidence based practices like a 39 week induction, I will definitely judge someone more who is doing risky things solely based on their l/d preference. |
Just because someone doesn’t get induced at 39 weeks doesn’t mean they will go till week 42. You do know babies are born everyday at 40 weeks and at 41 weeks. Hard for you to grasp that, I presume. |