Women's NCAA championship game

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Its a shame. LSU and Reese played a brilliant game and had an amazing tournament. That is somewhat lost in the coverage of the poor officiating and Reese's celebration.

She could have been a media darling too if she had taken the high road. And yes, I know Clark trash talks and that wasn't covered.

She shouldn’t have to. Caitlin Clark is trash on the floor. But it’s excused, because she’s such a “fierce competitor”.

Angel Reese is not going to shuck and jive for y’all. People will always find a reason to find fault with her, and she knows it.

The same lovely “Angel” who gave the finger to some 14 year old Iowa fans? There is good reason to find fault with her and her trashy behavior.

You mean the thing that was reported by some random mom on twitter that was probably yelling all kinds of obscenities at Angel without any context?

I'm sure Angel walked past the little girl standing silently by her lonesome, saw an Iowa shirt and flipped her the bird.

Try harder, nobody even claimed she was "lovely".

That did not happen, we would have all seen the VIDEO if it did and people like you would have made sure of it. Stop making excuses for the classes idiot. And what's with the fake nightclub eyelashes during a basketball game. Talking about playing for the camera, she shows her "classiness" at every stage.

I was thinking that it must be uncomfortable to wear fake eyelashes and have five feet of hair trailing behind you while you are playing basketball. I used to play and I couldn’t stand hair flipping around.

[Anonymous]

Forgot the link

Anonymous wrote:It is becoming very clear why she didn't fit in at Maryland, I thought it was just the academics but now you see her true colors coming out. Brenda Freese doesn't play those games.

https://justwomenssports.com/reads/angel-reese-wooden-award-criteria-lsu-basketball/

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why did she give a crap about Clark’s “disrespecting” a player on another team? Weird. This chic is a real whiny snowflake.

Because the same types of critiques and disrespect have been levied against all of the SEC girls and they all notice it. "Thugs" "ghetto" "bar fight" etc.

Like she said, she was making a point bigger than her. Players from a bunch of SEC schools have already spoken up on support of her, including South Carolina and Tennessee.

They should. This is two years in a row that the media has zeroed in on the cute white girl while ignoring the better team filled with black women. Even now Paige Bueckers makes more from NIL than the entire SC team that beat UConn combined.

Clark is the best woman college player by every metric. Sorry this blows the narrative. Would you have the media just ignore her accomplishments because she isn’t the right color? And BTW, the media has been celebrating black women basketball players for decades to the extent that they celebrate women athletes at all, so I don’t know what you are talking about.

Every metric including defense right? Stop it.

It's about the preferential treatment she gets. She's never called out for her crap, and she has a lot of it. Same with Haley Van Lith. Same with Diana Taurasi. There is no undercurrent with them; just fierce competitors.

Re: black female athletes. No, they really have not other than token pats on the head. Look at U.S. soccer, Anna Kournikova and Maria Sharapova, Diana Taurusi and Sue Bird. On and on. The athletes notice.

[Anonymous]

I hate that all the focus has been on weird hand gestures rather than the phenomenal level of play in the game. So ridiculous that people are spending so much time talking about Angel pointing at her finger. Caitlin Clark is also well known for taking trash. They’re there to play the game, not be best friends.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I hate that all the focus has been on weird hand gestures rather than the phenomenal level of play in the game. So ridiculous that people are spending so much time talking about Angel pointing at her finger. Caitlin Clark is also well known for taking trash. They’re there to play the game, not be best friends.

Guess Angel didn’t get that message regarding the Iowa-South Carolina game.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why did she give a crap about Clark’s “disrespecting” a player on another team? Weird. This chic is a real whiny snowflake.

Because the same types of critiques and disrespect have been levied against all of the SEC girls and they all notice it. "Thugs" "ghetto" "bar fight" etc.

Like she said, she was making a point bigger than her. Players from a bunch of SEC schools have already spoken up on support of her, including South Carolina and Tennessee.

They should. This is two years in a row that the media has zeroed in on the cute white girl while ignoring the better team filled with black women. Even now Paige Bueckers makes more from NIL than the entire SC team that beat UConn combined.

Clark is the best woman college player by every metric. Sorry this blows the narrative. Would you have the media just ignore her accomplishments because she isn’t the right color? And BTW, the media has been celebrating black women basketball players for decades to the extent that they celebrate women athletes at all, so I don’t know what you are talking about.

Agree, and I was going to say similar. In what world does it make sense for the media to ignore promoting the best player in women’s basketball on one of the best teams?

Nobody said ignore her. They just want their flowers too and opportunities that follow.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why did she give a crap about Clark’s “disrespecting” a player on another team? Weird. This chic is a real whiny snowflake.

Because the same types of critiques and disrespect have been levied against all of the SEC girls and they all notice it. "Thugs" "ghetto" "bar fight" etc.

Like she said, she was making a point bigger than her. Players from a bunch of SEC schools have already spoken up on support of her, including South Carolina and Tennessee.

They should. This is two years in a row that the media has zeroed in on the cute white girl while ignoring the better team filled with black women. Even now Paige Bueckers makes more from NIL than the entire SC team that beat UConn combined.

Clark is the best woman college player by every metric. Sorry this blows the narrative. Would you have the media just ignore her accomplishments because she isn’t the right color? And BTW, the media has been celebrating black women basketball players for decades to the extent that they celebrate women athletes at all, so I don’t know what you are talking about.

Every metric including defense right? Stop it.

It's about the preferential treatment she gets. She's never called out for her crap, and she has a lot of it. Same with Haley Van Lith. Same with Diana Taurasi. There is no undercurrent with them; just fierce competitors.

Re: black female athletes. No, they really have not other than token pats on the head. Look at U.S. soccer, Anna Kournikova and Maria Sharapova, Diana Taurusi and Sue Bird. On and on. The athletes notice.

She should get preferential treatment. Are we not allowed to celebrate or give notoriety to anyone besides black people anymore?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why did she give a crap about Clark’s “disrespecting” a player on another team? Weird. This chic is a real whiny snowflake.

Because the same types of critiques and disrespect have been levied against all of the SEC girls and they all notice it. "Thugs" "ghetto" "bar fight" etc.

Like she said, she was making a point bigger than her. Players from a bunch of SEC schools have already spoken up on support of her, including South Carolina and Tennessee.

They should. This is two years in a row that the media has zeroed in on the cute white girl while ignoring the better team filled with black women. Even now Paige Bueckers makes more from NIL than the entire SC team that beat UConn combined.

Clark is the best woman college player by every metric. Sorry this blows the narrative. Would you have the media just ignore her accomplishments because she isn’t the right color? And BTW, the media has been celebrating black women basketball players for decades to the extent that they celebrate women athletes at all, so I don’t know what you are talking about.

She's the best by scoring, that's the only metric. Volume scorers don't win in the mens game, they don't win in the NBA and the don't win in the womens game when the come up against a more complete team. And by the way, the media always celebrates the white player when they have the opportunity.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why did she give a crap about Clark’s “disrespecting” a player on another team? Weird. This chic is a real whiny snowflake.

Because the same types of critiques and disrespect have been levied against all of the SEC girls and they all notice it. "Thugs" "ghetto" "bar fight" etc.

Like she said, she was making a point bigger than her. Players from a bunch of SEC schools have already spoken up on support of her, including South Carolina and Tennessee.

They should. This is two years in a row that the media has zeroed in on the cute white girl while ignoring the better team filled with black women. Even now Paige Bueckers makes more from NIL than the entire SC team that beat UConn combined.

Clark is the best woman college player by every metric. Sorry this blows the narrative. Would you have the media just ignore her accomplishments because she isn’t the right color? And BTW, the media has been celebrating black women basketball players for decades to the extent that they celebrate women athletes at all, so I don’t know what you are talking about.

Every metric including defense right? Stop it.

It's about the preferential treatment she gets. She's never called out for her crap, and she has a lot of it. Same with Haley Van Lith. Same with Diana Taurasi. There is no undercurrent with them; just fierce competitors.

Re: black female athletes. No, they really have not other than token pats on the head. Look at U.S. soccer, Anna Kournikova and Maria Sharapova, Diana Taurusi and Sue Bird. On and on. The athletes notice.

She should get preferential treatment. Are we not allowed to celebrate or give notoriety to anyone besides black people anymore?

Usually we celebrate the winner. Looking at the athletic now, she still dominates the coverage

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why did she give a crap about Clark’s “disrespecting” a player on another team? Weird. This chic is a real whiny snowflake.

Because the same types of critiques and disrespect have been levied against all of the SEC girls and they all notice it. "Thugs" "ghetto" "bar fight" etc.

Like she said, she was making a point bigger than her. Players from a bunch of SEC schools have already spoken up on support of her, including South Carolina and Tennessee.

They should. This is two years in a row that the media has zeroed in on the cute white girl while ignoring the better team filled with black women. Even now Paige Bueckers makes more from NIL than the entire SC team that beat UConn combined.

Clark is the best woman college player by every metric. Sorry this blows the narrative. Would you have the media just ignore her accomplishments because she isn’t the right color? And BTW, the media has been celebrating black women basketball players for decades to the extent that they celebrate women athletes at all, so I don’t know what you are talking about.

She's the best by scoring, that's the only metric. Volume scorers don't win in the mens game, they don't win in the NBA and the don't win in the womens game when the come up against a more complete team. And by the way, the media always celebrates the white player when they have the opportunity.

What rock do you live under? The media has celebrated black basketball players every day for 40 years! Are they not allowed at all to talk about a white player for a change?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why did she give a crap about Clark’s “disrespecting” a player on another team? Weird. This chic is a real whiny snowflake.

Because the same types of critiques and disrespect have been levied against all of the SEC girls and they all notice it. "Thugs" "ghetto" "bar fight" etc.

Like she said, she was making a point bigger than her. Players from a bunch of SEC schools have already spoken up on support of her, including South Carolina and Tennessee.

They should. This is two years in a row that the media has zeroed in on the cute white girl while ignoring the better team filled with black women. Even now Paige Bueckers makes more from NIL than the entire SC team that beat UConn combined.

Clark is the best woman college player by every metric. Sorry this blows the narrative. Would you have the media just ignore her accomplishments because she isn’t the right color? And BTW, the media has been celebrating black women basketball players for decades to the extent that they celebrate women athletes at all, so I don’t know what you are talking about.

She's the best by scoring, that's the only metric. Volume scorers don't win in the mens game, they don't win in the NBA and the don't win in the womens game when the come up against a more complete team. And by the way, the media always celebrates the white player when they have the opportunity.

What rock do you live under? The media has celebrated black basketball players every day for 40 years! Are they not allowed at all to talk about a white player for a change?

I'm the OP. The undercurrent here is that this situation reflects our society now. It doesn't matter what either player did, people are stacked on those sides base on skin color alone.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why did she give a crap about Clark’s “disrespecting” a player on another team? Weird. This chic is a real whiny snowflake.

Because the same types of critiques and disrespect have been levied against all of the SEC girls and they all notice it. "Thugs" "ghetto" "bar fight" etc.

Like she said, she was making a point bigger than her. Players from a bunch of SEC schools have already spoken up on support of her, including South Carolina and Tennessee.

They should. This is two years in a row that the media has zeroed in on the cute white girl while ignoring the better team filled with black women. Even now Paige Bueckers makes more from NIL than the entire SC team that beat UConn combined.

Clark is the best woman college player by every metric. Sorry this blows the narrative. Would you have the media just ignore her accomplishments because she isn’t the right color? And BTW, the media has been celebrating black women basketball players for decades to the extent that they celebrate women athletes at all, so I don’t know what you are talking about.

She's the best by scoring, that's the only metric. Volume scorers don't win in the mens game, they don't win in the NBA and the don't win in the womens game when the come up against a more complete team. And by the way, the media always celebrates the white player when they have the opportunity.

What rock do you live under? The media has celebrated black basketball players every day for 40 years! Are they not allowed at all to talk about a white player for a change?

Look at the current MVP race. Look at how desperate the media is for Luka to actually win. They celebrate the black players when they don't have a choice, but they are desperate to find the great white player

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why did she give a crap about Clark’s “disrespecting” a player on another team? Weird. This chic is a real whiny snowflake.

Because the same types of critiques and disrespect have been levied against all of the SEC girls and they all notice it. "Thugs" "ghetto" "bar fight" etc.

Like she said, she was making a point bigger than her. Players from a bunch of SEC schools have already spoken up on support of her, including South Carolina and Tennessee.

They should. This is two years in a row that the media has zeroed in on the cute white girl while ignoring the better team filled with black women. Even now Paige Bueckers makes more from NIL than the entire SC team that beat UConn combined.

Clark is the best woman college player by every metric. Sorry this blows the narrative. Would you have the media just ignore her accomplishments because she isn’t the right color? And BTW, the media has been celebrating black women basketball players for decades to the extent that they celebrate women athletes at all, so I don’t know what you are talking about.

She's the best by scoring, that's the only metric. Volume scorers don't win in the mens game, they don't win in the NBA and the don't win in the womens game when the come up against a more complete team. And by the way, the media always celebrates the white player when they have the opportunity.

If by "only" metric, you're intentionally ignoring assists, where she also led the country in two of the last three seasons. Do you people actually have any knowledge of the things you write?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Its a shame. LSU and Reese played a brilliant game and had an amazing tournament. That is somewhat lost in the coverage of the poor officiating and Reese's celebration.

She could have been a media darling too if she had taken the high road. And yes, I know Clark trash talks and that wasn't covered.

She shouldn’t have to. Caitlin Clark is trash on the floor. But it’s excused, because she’s such a “fierce competitor”.

Angel Reese is not going to shuck and jive for y’all. People will always find a reason to find fault with her, and she knows it.

The same lovely “Angel” who gave the finger to some 14 year old Iowa fans? There is good reason to find fault with her and her trashy behavior.

You mean the thing that was reported by some random mom on twitter that was probably yelling all kinds of obscenities at Angel without any context?

I'm sure Angel walked past the little girl standing silently by her lonesome, saw an Iowa shirt and flipped her the bird.

Try harder, nobody even claimed she was "lovely".

That did not happen, we would have all seen the VIDEO if it did and people like you would have made sure of it. Stop making excuses for the classes idiot. And what's with the fake nightclub eyelashes during a basketball game. Talking about playing for the camera, she shows her "classiness" at every stage.

So this is EXACTLY Angel Reese’s point. Why can’t she wear eyelashes? Or the longest weave in creation? She still set the record for double-doubles this year. she doesn’t need to perform for you, or anyone else. Everything she does, you will find a way to insult her and call her classless, which we all know what that REALLY means.

Also, considering the number of women transferring OUT of the Maryland program, it’s not Angel. Three of the four freshman have entered the transfer portal.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why did she give a crap about Clark’s “disrespecting” a player on another team? Weird. This chic is a real whiny snowflake.

Because the same types of critiques and disrespect have been levied against all of the SEC girls and they all notice it. "Thugs" "ghetto" "bar fight" etc.

Like she said, she was making a point bigger than her. Players from a bunch of SEC schools have already spoken up on support of her, including South Carolina and Tennessee.

They should. This is two years in a row that the media has zeroed in on the cute white girl while ignoring the better team filled with black women. Even now Paige Bueckers makes more from NIL than the entire SC team that beat UConn combined.

Clark is the best woman college player by every metric. Sorry this blows the narrative. Would you have the media just ignore her accomplishments because she isn’t the right color? And BTW, the media has been celebrating black women basketball players for decades to the extent that they celebrate women athletes at all, so I don’t know what you are talking about.

She's the best by scoring, that's the only metric. Volume scorers don't win in the mens game, they don't win in the NBA and the don't win in the womens game when the come up against a more complete team. And by the way, the media always celebrates the white player when they have the opportunity.

What rock do you live under? The media has celebrated black basketball players every day for 40 years! Are they not allowed at all to talk about a white player for a change?

I'm the OP. The undercurrent here is that this situation reflects our society now. It doesn't matter what either player did, people are stacked on those sides base on skin color alone.

Well, LSU created this totally unnecessary controversy. And they ruined what should have been a great day for women’s sports.