Picture of Mohammed

[Anonymous]

I’m a dem but Trump was right about the Muslim ban

You don’t want the us to turn into France, israel or India

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This was a 14th century image that was shown in an art history class. The instructor did not depict the prophet.

The image, however, did, e which is why the professor was fired

The student news paper should respond with a retrospective of Mohammed images

[Anonymous]

This is so ridiculous. I’m not Muslim and will not abide by tenants of the Islamic faith. Why do Muslims insist that we all abide by their religion? If they can’t handle pictures of Mohammed, they should drop out of art history. They were warned.

France is 100% correct to try to eradicate religion in public spaces.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:This is so ridiculous. I’m not Muslim and will not abide by tenants of the Islamic faith. Why do Muslims insist that we all abide by their religion? If they can’t handle pictures of Mohammed, they should drop out of art history. They were warned.

France is 100% correct to try to eradicate religion in public spaces.

This is wild to me that a non-Muslim is held to Muslim religion standards- in an art history class. If I remember correctly, there was a major publication that ran a picture of Muhammad, this was years ago. Maybe it was time? There was a lot of hoopla over it, but ultimately it is free speech. I think this professor has grounds for a winning lawsuit.

[Anonymous]

Where in the Quran is this forbidden? Could someone cite chapter and verse?

[Anonymous]

What a waste. The proper answer was to expel the student, because she was too stupid and simple for an education to be of any use for her. And for remaining Muslims, if they can’t live in a world where their forebears have painted portraits of their beloved prophet, they are free to end their misery and join him in Heaven.

[Anonymous]

Someone should find professors there posting images of jesus , especially as black . Will they get fired ?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This was a 14th century image that was shown in an art history class. The instructor did not depict the prophet.

The image, however, did, e which is why the professor was fired

The student news paper should respond with a retrospective of Mohammed images

if anything the newspaper will support the firing

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This is so ridiculous. I’m not Muslim and will not abide by tenants of the Islamic faith. Why do Muslims insist that we all abide by their religion? If they can’t handle pictures of Mohammed, they should drop out of art history. They were warned.

France is 100% correct to try to eradicate religion in public spaces.

This is wild to me that a non-Muslim is held to Muslim religion standards- in an art history class. If I remember correctly, there was a major publication that ran a picture of Muhammad, this was years ago. Maybe it was time? There was a lot of hoopla over it, but ultimately it is free speech. I think this professor has grounds for a winning lawsuit.

it’s a private university . However there is a strong argument to have private universities to be considered state actors like company towns are

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:South Park explains this

They explain everything. They’re genius!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I don’t think many non Muslim Americans are randomly creating pictures of Mohammed.

Until I read this news story, I would have had no idea that this was offensive at all.

So were you planning on drawing or displaying a big pic of Mohammed this weekend and now that’s cancelled?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:South Park explains this

They explain everything. They’re genius!

you can’t get the episodes at least uncensored anywhere

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This is so ridiculous. I’m not Muslim and will not abide by tenants of the Islamic faith. Why do Muslims insist that we all abide by their religion? If they can’t handle pictures of Mohammed, they should drop out of art history. They were warned.

France is 100% correct to try to eradicate religion in public spaces.

This is wild to me that a non-Muslim is held to Muslim religion standards- in an art history class. If I remember correctly, there was a major publication that ran a picture of Muhammad, this was years ago. Maybe it was time? There was a lot of hoopla over it, but ultimately it is free speech. I think this professor has grounds for a winning lawsuit.

A teacher in France was murdered for showing Mohammed. Some Muslims do not play.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This is so ridiculous. I’m not Muslim and will not abide by tenants of the Islamic faith. Why do Muslims insist that we all abide by their religion? If they can’t handle pictures of Mohammed, they should drop out of art history. They were warned.

France is 100% correct to try to eradicate religion in public spaces.

This is wild to me that a non-Muslim is held to Muslim religion standards- in an art history class. If I remember correctly, there was a major publication that ran a picture of Muhammad, this was years ago. Maybe it was time? There was a lot of hoopla over it, but ultimately it is free speech. I think this professor has grounds for a winning lawsuit.

it’s a private university . However there is a strong argument to have private universities to be considered state actors like company towns are

A private CHRISTIAN university. Islamic teachings should not be a factor at all.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This is so ridiculous. I’m not Muslim and will not abide by tenants of the Islamic faith. Why do Muslims insist that we all abide by their religion? If they can’t handle pictures of Mohammed, they should drop out of art history. They were warned.

France is 100% correct to try to eradicate religion in public spaces.

This is wild to me that a non-Muslim is held to Muslim religion standards- in an art history class. If I remember correctly, there was a major publication that ran a picture of Muhammad, this was years ago. Maybe it was time? There was a lot of hoopla over it, but ultimately it is free speech. I think this professor has grounds for a winning lawsuit.

A teacher in France was murdered for showing Mohammed. Some Muslims do not play.

Which makes those extremists’ beliefs even crazier. Murder is OK, but don’t show a picture of Mohammed, right?