|
Yes they exist:
Potomac School St Stephens St Agnes Stone Ridge Georgetown Prep St Albans St Anslems Visitation These schools are inclusive but not pushing ideology of any kind in the classroom |
Wow. Yes, you are defensive. So your kids go to a school that tells them what to think (i.e., what you think). Because everything else is evil and immoral. |
Sorry, no, it's not "equally dangerous". Democrats are not historically this lockstep (does anyone remember any political history before 2016? Joe Lieberman and Blue Dog democrats anyone? Sheesh). IMO dems have circled the wagons in recent years as a unified defense against Trump/Trumpism/anti-democratic right. And it has been reasonably effective as a defense of our shared, lower-case-d democratic principles. That is the clear and present danger to our country, as evidenced by Jan 6. Not intolerance to nuanced/more moderate views of specific dem party policies. |
You don't want a non-existent moderate school. Just go religious if you have a problem with Michelle Obama or Ruth Bader Ginsberg. |
One side wants to make sure people have access to clean and safe food, water and air. One side wants to ensure billionaires and businesses have freedom to do what they want. bOtH sIdEs. |
The bolded are religious schools. Did you read the OP's first post? |
| OK, maybe it is not equally dangerous. But it is still dangerous. And what is worse, it is fuel for the far right. |
Case in point. It's as if everyone who is into politics suffers from the same disease of the brain. |
I don’t have a problem with either of them. RBG is a great example of a nuanced thinker. And religious schools are out because we are atheist. |
Anyone who doesn’t believe a party of the people can be dangerous needs to read about socialist uprisings and dictatorships in other countries. My family actually escaped from one. Some of my family members were executed for holding incorrect political and moral opinions. US Democrats are not as bad as the Republicans yet, as the Jan 6 nuts demonstrate, but I can definitely see the potential for disaster if polarization continues to the extreme. |
[/b] +1. This. And you can see this knee-jerk reaction throughout this thread. OP can't even ask a reasonable question without being ridiculed and vilified. |
Exactly. |
| You would have liked my private school back in the early 90's, OP. I remember an assembly when we had a pro-choice woman and a pro-life woman debate each other. Every faculty member whose opinion I knew and most (but not all) of the students were pro-choice. As a pro-life student, I really appreciated that the subject was seen as being worthy of debate. I think that it would be really difficult to find both sides of this issue being presented respectfully at a school today. The school was totally nonreligious, but at Commencement (graduation) every year, we did have a short blessing said by a clergyperson. The school alternated between a Catholic priest, Protestant pastor, and rabbi, to respect the major religions represented at the school. I feel like those were the good ol' days. |
I'm the PP. Any party "can be" dangerous. Where did I say anywhere above that a party is not capable of being dangerous? It's an order of magnitude and anybody that equates what is happening right now with the Democratic Party and what's happening with the Republican Party in this country is...I don't know what. Trying to be contrarian? Because you can't be serious. Please identify an elected Democratic politician, or even a Democratic party nominee in a major state or national race, that is so intolerant of moderate Democrats as to be "dangerous". Now try the same thing with the Republican Party. Do you see the difference? |
PP again. I recognize the above debate is not on-topic, so to actually respond to OP's question, assuming it's coming from a good faith desire to find a school whose curriculum doesn't bend to the slightest breeze: another recommendation for an Episcopal or Catholic school. |