I've been here for a long time. I have never heard of Blair envy outside of DCUM, especially from families who attend a W. They're already happy where they are. The Blair accomplishments and accolades are a result of the students who got accepted to the magnet program. The same with the accolades and accomplishments of RM and Poolesville. Everyone knows this. |
You actually think people will admit of Blair envy? LOL Your post screams of envy. |
Perhaps, but you read about it here regularly. Some parents are just obsessed with ensuring their children attend Blair since it provides the best education available in MCPS. |
People are "obsessed" with getting a spot in the Blair magnet program, not with attending Blair in general. |
Some parents are just obsessed with ensuring their children attend Blair since it provides the best education available in MCPS for highly gifted kids in STEM. Not everyone has highly gifted kids and not all students want to do STEM. The Blair envy is a made up idea that Blair parents on DCUM like to throw around to make them feel superior even when their own kids aren't even in the program. |
The mental gymnastics is strong here. Where else would those obsessed with getting a spot in the Blair magnet program attend?????? |
Genuine question. Where? I would not think there would be a specific school. Anyone can apply to the magnet program. |
I duly note these are the neighborhood where liberal county leaders have homes - and have created ad hoc private schools via magnet programs in public schools. All animals are equal but some are more equal than others. |
No, not at Blair. If you're zoned for upcounty high schools, your potential SMACS magnet program is at Poolesville, not Blair. |
Within the DCC, you can clearly see Takoma Park ES has extremely different demographics from other adjacent ESs. And across Cluster Boundaries, you can clearly see both Garrett Park and Kensington, who have significantly different demographics from the adjacent ES in the DCC. But we don’t need the report to tell us what is obvious. Kensington goes mostly to BCC and Garrett Park goes to WJ to the west instead of going to more racially and socio-economically diverse schools to the east. And Takoma Park is the most white and affluent area within the DCC/Blair. The report outcome is supposed to be used to reduce these discrepancies among adjacent boundaries.
|
The first image shows Sligo Creek and Joann Leleck in the darker orange and red. Sligo Creek's numbers are skewed by the French Immersion program. TPES/PBES is in yellow, the same as neighboring ESS. No, Kensington does not "mostly" go to BCC. Garrett Park is likely going to be reassigned to Woodward when it opens. |
No clude but my non-magnet Blair student ended up taking 8 of the 16 manget classes while there in addition to another 8 APs. In many ways I felt this was better than being in the magnet since they could focus on their interests and didn't have that silly extra period. |
The problem with these studies is they're couched in this "same cluster" which is just a way to manipulate the outcome by segregating low-income areas. We need to take a broader look and consider changing cluster boundaries. |
Well, those images were taken from one section of the interim report titled The Effects of Cluster Boundaries. The final report states that "cluster boundaries are an impediment to addressing capacity challenges, especially in the most overcrowded schools." And "cluster boundaries may contribute to racial and socio-economic isolation." |
+1 The chart does not show what PP is claiming that it shows. The outlier in the Blair cluster isn't TPES/PBES, it is Sligo Creek. Both TPES/PBES is more like Highland View and ESS than it is like Sligo Creek ES, demographically. I have no particular attachment to Takoma Park, but I do have attachment to people using data responsibly, and PP is making claims that are not held up by the data. |